Skip to main content
  • 27 Accesses

Abstract

Ignorance, language and the problems of simplification all contributed in making the scientist appear remote (even foreign) and divorced from everyday life. In popular fiction this would lead almost inevitably to the stereotype with which we are now so familiar. Almost to a man (and they were all men) scientists were portrayed as, at best, unemotional and detached, and, at worst, inhuman and insane. Mindless of everyday affairs, fictional scientists were eccentric, unpunctual, slovenly, scruffy. They were cantankerous and short-tempered. Their precision was the precision of the pedant. They actively connived the deaths of others, failed to see the dangerous implications of their work, or were indifferent to the suffering that their research might cause. Lusting after fame or fortune, their dedication often became warped into an obsession leading them from one act of inhumanity to another.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Rudolphde Cordova, ‘The microbe of death’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1897, vol. 2, pp. 464–74; W.L. Alden, ‘The purple death’, Cassell’s Magazine, 1895, p. 115.

    Google Scholar 

  2. John G.E. Leech, ‘The microbe of love’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1902, vol. 2, p. 374.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John N. Raphael, ‘Up above: the story of the sky folk’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1912, vol. 2, pp. 710–60.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ibid. For the identification of women with vivisected animals, see Coral Lansbury, ‘Gynaecology, pornography and the anti-vivisection movement’, Victorian Studies, 28 (1985) pp. 413–37.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E.E. Kellett, ‘The lady automaton’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1901, vol. 1, p. 666.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Herbert C. Fyfe, ‘The first traverse of Africa’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1900, vol. 2, pp. 418–24.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sir Ernest Shackleton, ‘The making of an explorer’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1914, vol. 2, pp. 138–42.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ejnar Mikkelsen, ‘Lost in the Arctic’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1912, vol. 2, pp. 506–20.

    Google Scholar 

  9. David A. Hollinger, ‘Inquiry and uplift: late-nineteenth-century American academics and the moral efficacy of scientific practice’, in Thomas L. Haskell (ed.), The Authority of Experts: Studies in history (Bloomington, 1984), p. 142.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Julius L.F. Vogel, ‘Photographing electricity’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1899, vol. 2, p. 643.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Herbert N. Casson, ‘At last we can fly’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1907, vol. 2, p. 98;

    Google Scholar 

  12. Alder Anderson, ‘Analysing motion’, Pearson’s Magazine, 1902, vol. 1, pp. 502–9.

    Google Scholar 

  13. See I. Bernard Cohen, ‘The fear and distrust of science in historical perspective: some first thoughts’, in Andrei S. Markovits and Karl W. Deutsch (eds), Fear of Science — Trust in Science: Conditions for change in the climate of opinion (Cambridge, Mass., 1980), pp. 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Arthur Conan Doyle, ‘A study in scarlet’ (1887), reprinted in The Complete Sherlock Holmes Long Stories (London, 1929), pp. 12–13.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Arthur Conan Doyle, ‘The sign of four’ (1880), reprinted in The Complete Sherlock Holmes Long Stories (London, 1929), p. 136.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brian Wynne, ‘Physics and psychics: science, symbolic action and social control in late Victorian England’, in Barry Barnes and Steven Shapin (eds), Natural Order: Historical studies of scientific culture (London, 1979), p. 174.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colin Russell, Science and Social Change, 1700–1900 (London, 1983), p. 257.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Frank M. Turner, ‘Public science in Britain, 1880–1919’, Isis, 71 (1980), pp. 589–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. See G.R. Searle, The Quest for National Efficiency: A study in British politics and political thought, 1899–1914 (Berkeley, 1971);

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bernard Semmel, Imperialism and Social Reform: English social-imperial thought, 1895–1914 (London, 1960); and

    Google Scholar 

  21. Robert Scally, The Origins of the Lloyd George Coalition: The politics of social-imperialism, 1900–1918 (Princeton, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Étienne de La Boétie, The Politics of Obedience: The discourse of voluntary servitude, translated by Harry Kurz (Montreal, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Patrick Joyce, Work, Society and Politics: The culture of the factory in later Victorian England (London, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Peter Broks

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Broks, P. (1996). Images. In: Media Science before the Great War. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25043-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25043-1_4

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-25045-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-25043-1

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics