Skip to main content

South Africa’s Plans for Namibia’s Independence

  • Chapter
Book cover The Question of Namibia
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

It has already been pointed out that in the course of presenting its case during hearings in the International Court of Justice on Ethiopia’s and Liberia’s applications, South Africa not only registered its opposition to black majority rule for Namibia but also argued that a political system based on separate development, that is, apartheid, was more suitable for the territory. Accordingly, after the termination of the mandate by the UN General Assembly, South Africa started to establish such a system in the territory, thus ignoring and obstructing efforts by the UN to implement the General Assembly’s independence plan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. International Defence and Aid Fund for Southern Africa (IDAF), D & A Information Service Manual, No. 1, January–June 1967, pp. 32–3. Emphasis added.

    Google Scholar 

  2. IDAF, D & A Information Service Manual No. 3, October–December 1967, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Africa Institute (Pretoria), ‘The International Factor in South West Africa: A Factual Summary’, International Bulletin, Vol. II, No. 5, May 1964, pp. 144–52. The appointment of the Odendaal Commission was announced by Prime Minister Verwoed in September 1962. Thus the announcement was made during the early phase of the proceedings in the ICJ on the merits of the South West Africa case brought before the Court by Ethiopia and Liberia.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Africa Institute, ‘South West Africa: Decisions of the South African Government’, International Bulletin, Vol. II, No. 6, June 1964, p. 177.

    Google Scholar 

  5. RSA, ‘Development of Self-Government for Native Nations in South-West Africa Act, No. 54 of 1968’, in Statutes of the Republic of South Africa. ‘Constitutional Law’, Vol. 6, issue No. 6, (London: Butterworths, 1972) pp. 831–45.

    Google Scholar 

  6. IDAF, D & A Information Service Manual, No. 6, December 1968, p. 251.

    Google Scholar 

  7. IDAF, Namibia: The Facts (London: IDAF, 1980), pp. 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Africa Report, ‘Namibia’, Africa Report, Vol. 19, No. 6, November–December 1974, p. 35.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jan Moolman, ‘South West Africa: Self-Determination, Majority Rule, Democracy and Independence’, Africa Institute Bulletin, Vol. 14, No. 4, 1976, p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See for example, Henry Kissinger, ‘The Global Significance of Events in Angola’, Testimony to the Senate Subcommitte on Africa, 20 January 1976, Department of State Newsletter, No. 176, February 1976, p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Henry Kissinger, ‘The Relationship between America and Africa’, (Report to the Senate Foreign Relation Committee on his two week trip to Africa, 13 May 1976), Department of State Newsletter, No 180, June 1976, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Donald Baker, ‘Kissinger … Carter: Two Views of Southern Africa’, Africa Institute Bulletin, Vol. 15, No. 8, 1977, p. 197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Laurent C. W. Kaela

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaela, L.C.W. (1996). South Africa’s Plans for Namibia’s Independence. In: The Question of Namibia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24996-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics