Skip to main content
  • 40 Accesses

Abstract

This study focuses on contestation over Namibia’s independence. Before the territory became independent on 21 March 1990, it had changed its status from a German colony, to a protectorate of the Union of South Africa, to a mandated territory of the League of Nations and, finally, to a direct responsibility of the United Nations Organization (UNO), while under South Africa’s illegal occupation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Hamilton Foley, Woodrow Wilson’s Case for the League of Nations (New York: Kraus Reprint Co., 1965), pp. 46–7.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See, for example, Gail-Maryse Cockram, South West African Mandate (Cape Town: Juta & Co. Ltd., 1976), pp. 41–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. John Morton Blum, Woodrow Wilson and the Politics of Morality (Boston: Little, Brown, 1956), pp. 147 and 148;

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faye Carroll, South West Africa and the United Nations (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1967), pp. 22 and 24.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hassel D. Hall, Mandates, Dependencies and Trusteeship (London: Stevens & Sons, 1948), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thomas A. Bailey, Woodrow Wilson and the Lost Peace (Chicago: Quadrangle Books, 1944), p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  7. S. Slonim, ‘The Origins of the South West Africa Dispute: The Versailles Peace Conference and the Creation of the Mandates System’, in John Dugard, ed., The South West Africa/Namibia Dispute: Documents and Scholarly Writings on the Controversy Between South Africa and the United Nations (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973), p. 47.

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.K. Hancock and Jean Van der Poel, eds., Selections from Smut’s Papers Vol. IV (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1966), p. 77. Amery was Assistant Secretary of the Imperial War Cabinet.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Slonim in Dugard, The South West Africa/Namibia Dispute, pp. 58–60; Seth P. Tillman, Anglo-American Relations at the Paris Peace Conference of 1919 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961), pp. 93–4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Harold S. Johnson, Self-Determination Within the Community of Nations (Leyden: A.W. Sijthoff, 1967), pp. 33–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Laurent C. W. Kaela

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaela, L.C.W. (1996). Introduction. In: The Question of Namibia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24996-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics