Consensus Here, Consensus There … but not Consensus Everywhere: The Labour Party, Equality and Social Policy in the 1950s

  • Nick Ellison
Part of the Contemporary History in Context Series book series (CHIC)

Abstract

A good deal has been written about the existence, or not, of a ‘postwar consensus’.1 While many contemporary historians treat the period from 1940 through to, at least, the early 1960s as one marked by common agreement about the basic objectives and principles of government amongst the leaders of both major political parties, others believe the level of consensus has been overstated.2 ‘Consensus’ on this second view exists more in the mind of those who look back nostalgically to a pre-Thatcherite past where, to echo L. P. Hartley, things were done differently — and with less rancour. Much depends, of course, on how ‘consensus’ is defined. This chapter will employ two separate but equally plausible interpretations, one ‘procedural’ the other ‘substantive’, in order to demonstrate the difficulties associated with efforts to treat Labour’s approach to social policy in the 1950s in consensual terms.

Keywords

Europe Income Stake Omic Ethos 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    See, for example, Paul Addison, The Road to 1945, 1975, London, Jonathan Cape;Google Scholar
  2. Paul Addison, ‘The Road from 1945’, in Peter Hennessy and Anthony Seldon, eds., Ruling Performance: British Governments from Attlee to Thatcher, 1988, Oxford, Blackwell;Google Scholar
  3. Anthony Seldon, Churchill’s Indian Summer: The Conservative Government 1951–55, 1981, London, Hodder and Stoughton;Google Scholar
  4. Dennis Kavanagh and Peter Morris, Consensus Politics: from Attlee to Major, 2nd edn, 1994, Oxford, Blackwell;Google Scholar
  5. Keith Middlemas, Power, Competition and the State, vol I, Britain in Search of Balance, 1940–1961, 1986, Basingstoke, Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 2.
    See Ben Pimlott, ‘The Myth of Consensus’, in L.M. Smith, ed., The Making of Britain: Echoes of Greatness, 1988, Basingstoke, Channel Four/Macmillan.Google Scholar
  7. Stephen Brooke’s Labour’s War: The Labour Party During the Second World War, 1992, Oxford, Clarendon Press, also questions the existence of consensus in the wartme Coalition government.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 4.
    In some contrast to the 1945 contest of which the Evening Standard’s Charles Wintour said that ‘real hatred and venom were abroad’. See Kenneth O. Morgan, Labour in Power, 1945–1951, 1984, Oxford, Clarendon Press, p. 485.Google Scholar
  9. 8.
    Philip Williams, Hugh Gaitskell, 1979, London, Jonathan Cape, pp. 312–18 for a discussion of ‘Butskellism’.Google Scholar
  10. Kenneth O. Morgan also challenges the accuracy of the depiction in The People’s Peace: British History 1945–1989, 1990, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 118–19.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    C.A.R. Crosland, The Future of Socialism, London, Jonathan Cape, 1956, p. 517;Google Scholar
  12. Janet Morgan, ed., The Backbench Diaries of Richard Grossman, 1981, London, Hamish Hamilton and Jonathan Cape, 1981, p. 437.Google Scholar
  13. 12.
    The emergence of welfare states in Western Europe and the particular social, economic and political factors which gave rise to them are discussed by Gosta Esping-Andersen, The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism, 1990, Cambridge, Polity;Google Scholar
  14. Peter Baldwin, The Politics of Social Solidarity, 1990, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, and by a variety of authors inCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Peter Flora, ed., Growth to Limits: The Western European Welfare States Since World War Two, 1986, Berlin, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
  16. 13.
    Thomas, Balogh, The Dollar Crisis: Causes and Cures, 1949, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, p. xxxvii.Google Scholar
  17. 16.
    Rodney Lowe, The Welfare State in Britain Since 1945, 1993, Basingstoke, Macmillan, pp. 247–48.Google Scholar
  18. 19.
    Ian Macleod and Enoch Powell, ‘Social Services: Needs and Means’, 1952, London, Conservative Political Centre.Google Scholar
  19. 20.
    Nicholas Ellison, Egalitarian Thought and Labour Politics: Retreating Visions, 1994, London, Routledge, ch. 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 21.
    Dalton’s influence in the creation of a number of NEC policy committees is discussed by Ben Pimlott, Hugh Dalton, 1985, London, Jonathan Cape, pp. 212–24.Google Scholar
  21. 22.
    See Douglas Jay, The Socialist Case, 1937, London, Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  22. 23.
    E.F.M. Durbin, The Politics of Democratic Socialism, 1940, London, Routledge and Kegan Paul, p. 306.Google Scholar
  23. 29.
    C.A.R. Crosland, The Future of Socialism, 1956, London, Jonathan Cape, p. 115.Google Scholar
  24. 34.
    Balogh and Crossman were particularly worried about this prospect. See R.H.S. Crossman, ‘The Affluent Society’, in Planning for Freedom, 1965, London, Hamish Hamilton, pp. 97–8.Google Scholar
  25. 36.
    C.A.R. Crosland, ‘The Transition from Capitalism’, in R.H.S. Crossman, ed., New Fabian Essays, 1952, London, Turnstile.Google Scholar
  26. 39.
    See R.M. Titmuss, Problems of Social Policy, 1950, London, HMSO.Google Scholar
  27. 40.
    R.M. Titmuss, ‘The Social Division of Welfare’, reprinted in Essays on the Welfare State, 1963, London, Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
  28. 41.
    Peter Townsend, ‘A Society for All’, in Norman MacKenzie, ed., Conviction, 1958, London, MacGibbon Kee, p. 120.Google Scholar
  29. 43.
    Crossman’s comic account of this episode is contained in R.H.S. Crossman, The Politics of Pensions, 1972, Liverpool, Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  30. 44.
    The ideas were initially published by AAA Abel-Smith in The Reform of Social Security, Fabian Research Series, 161, 1953, London, Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  31. 48.
    R.M. Titmuss, ‘The Irresponsible Society’, in AAA Titmuss, 1963, p. 243.Google Scholar
  32. 59.
    Douglas Jay, Socialism in the New Society, 1962, London, Longman, p. 247.Google Scholar
  33. 60.
    Roy Jenkins, The Labour Case, 1959, Harmondsworth, Penguin, pp. 98–9.Google Scholar
  34. 62.
    Philip Williams, ed., The Diary of Hugh Gaitskell, 1945–1956, 1983, London, Jonathan Cape, p. 328.Google Scholar
  35. 68.
    Margaret Cole, ‘Memo on LP Policy for Education’, Re 161, May 1957, p. 7. These sentiments had already been expressed in Labour’s policy statement Towards Equality, published in 1956 (see p. 6).Google Scholar
  36. 74.
    R.H.S. Crossman, ‘Suggested Framework for a Section of the Education Policy Statement Dealing with the Private Sector’, Re 240, November 1957, p. 1. Study Group on Education, Box 32, Labour Party Archives.Google Scholar
  37. 75.
    R.H.S. Crossman, ‘Some Notes in Elite Education with Special Reference to the Problem of Universities’, Re 211, October 1957, p. 3. Study Group on Education, Box 32, Labour Party Archives.Google Scholar
  38. 77.
    Brian Abel-Smith, ‘Educational Maintenance Allowances’, Re 224, November 1957, pp. 4–5. Education Study Group, Box 32, Labour Party ArchivesGoogle Scholar
  39. 84.
    These issues are discussed by, inter alia, David Harvey, The Condition of Postmodernity, 1989, Oxford, Blackwell;Google Scholar
  40. Scott Lash and John Urry, The End of Organised Capitalism, 1987, Cambridge, Polity.Google Scholar
  41. 85.
    Eric Hobsbawm, Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century, 1914–1991, 1994, London, Michael Joseph, p. 255.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nick Ellison

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations