Skip to main content

The Cultural Non-Homogeneity of Québec: Secessionism, Indigenous Legal Perspectives and Inseparability

  • Chapter
Self-Determination
  • 133 Accesses

Abstract

I would like to frame my remarks within a legal focus, rather than the more explicitly political contributions to this general topic. I would also like to respond to some extent to comments that have been made about self-determination for the province of Québec. In a sense, the topic of my remarks is a question, a very basic one: “Does the road to Québec’s sovereignty run through Aboriginal territory?”1 It is a bit of a foregone conclusion that my answer is going to be “yes”. The matter of self-determination for Québec is not central to a discussion of Aboriginal claims to self-determination. However, as I have suggested, the issues intersect. I will therefore address the whole matter of Aboriginal self-determination through the theme of Québec self-determination.

For a more detailed treatment of Québec secession and Indigenous peoples’ status and rights, see M. E. Turpel, “Does the Road to Québec Sovereignty Run through Aboriginal Territory?”, in D. Dvache and R. Pervin (eds), Negotiating with a Sovereign Québec (Toronto: Lorimer, 1993), p. 42.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. See, Quebec in a New World: The PQ Plan for Sovereignty (Toronto: Lorimer, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  2. H. Bucheit, Secession: The Legitimacy of Self-Determination (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Professor Turp’s remarks, supra, chapter 15, and his chapter, “Quebec’s Democratic Right to Self-Determination”, in Tangled Web: Legal Aspects of Deconfederation (Toronto: C. D. Howe Institute, 1992), p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  4. For an articulation of this position see, D. Cliche, “The Sovereignty and Territorial Integrity of Quebec”, The Network, May 1992, p. 10.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Frontier Dispute (Burkina Faso/Mali), 80 ILR 440, p. 554 (separate opinion).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Cited in I. Brownlie, Principles of International Law, 4th edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 135. Professor Brownlie also suggests that uti possidetis is “by no means mandatory and states are free to adopt other principles”.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Turpel, M.E. (1996). The Cultural Non-Homogeneity of Québec: Secessionism, Indigenous Legal Perspectives and Inseparability. In: Clark, D., Williamson, R. (eds) Self-Determination. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24918-3_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics