Skip to main content

Is Religion a Product of Wishful Thinking?

  • Chapter
Can Religion be Explained Away?

Part of the book series: Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion ((CSPR))

Abstract

Religion is a dream, a fantasy-picture which expresses man’s situation and at the same time provides a fantasy-gratification of man’s wish to overcome that situation. … In religion man recognizes his helplessness, his dependence, and he seeks to overcome it by calling in the aid of the imagination. Sacrifice and prayer thus stand at the very centre of religion and reveal to us its essential character and aim … ‘the prayer pregnant with sorrow, the prayer of disconsolate love, the prayer which expresses the power of the heart that crushes man to the ground, the prayer which begins in despair and ends in rapture’.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Eugene Kamenka, The Philosophy of Ludwig Feuerbach (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1970), pp. 39f. The concluding quotation is from Feuerbach.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bertrand Russell, Why I am not a Christian (London: George Allen & Unwin, 1957), p. 16.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Primo Levi, The Periodic Table (New York: Schocken Books, 1984), p. 220.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.H. Price, ‘Some Considerations about Belief’, in A. Phillips Griffiths, ed., Knowledge and Belief (London: Oxford University Press, 1967), p. 43. For a more recent case in point, consider the following definition by Dan Sperber: ‘a subject’s factual beliefs are all the independently stored representations that the subject is capable of retrieving from his encyclopaedic memory and all the representations that, by means of his inferential device, he is capable of deriving from his stored factual beliefs’ (‘Apparently Irrational Beliefs’, in M. Hollis and S. Lukes, eds., Rationality and Relativism [Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982], p. 172.)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williazn Preston Jr, ‘On Omaha Beach’, New York Review of Books, 14 July 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  6. On this, cf. e.g., Karl-Otto Apel, ‘Universal Principles and Particular Decisions and Forms of Life’, in R. Gaita, ed., Value and Understanding (London: Routledge, 1990), pp. 83ff.

    Google Scholar 

  7. D.Z. Phillips, The Concept of Prayer (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1981), pp. 101ff. The quotation is from p. 102.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gareth Moore, Believing in God: A Philosophical Essay (Edinburgh: T. & T. Clark, 1988), pp. 131f.

    Google Scholar 

  9. This point is forcefully made by O.K. Bouwsma in ‘Miss Anscombe on Faith’, in the collection of his essays, Without Proof or Evidence, ed. J.L. Craft and Ronald E. Hustwit (Lincoln, Neb. and London: University of Nebraska Press, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  10. This type of attitude seems to lie at the basis of the religious reductionism attributed by D.Z. Phillips to Ingmar Bergman. See his essay, ‘Ingmar Bergman’s Reductionism: “A Modern Cosmology of the Spirit”’, in Through a Darkening Glass (Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 The Claremont Graduate School

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hertzberg, L. (1996). Is Religion a Product of Wishful Thinking?. In: Phillips, D.Z. (eds) Can Religion be Explained Away?. Claremont Studies in the Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24858-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics