Abstract
Authority in early modern England ran along various channels, and operated within a spectrum of spheres of concern. At one end of that spectrum lay the authority most familiar to the historian and the general reader, the authority of the monarch and central government. At the other, lay that bundle of social norms and conventions, often imperfectly grasped and articulated by contemporaries, which constituted, in the broad sense of the term, the ‘authority’ within which people lived their everyday community and family lives. In between these there lay a number of webs of authority. Some, like the authority inherent in the social structure, have been much studied by historians as they have attempted to reconstruct social hierarchies or analyse languages of social description. Others, like the authority which structured gender relations, have come to attract considerable attention from historians over the last few years. Yet others, like the problems of authority implicit in the relationships between different age groups which form the background to this chapter, although now the subject of an important new book by Paul Griffiths, have been little studied hitherto.1 This is odd, since, even when due allowances are made for the stereotyped social complaint of contemporary didactic literature, it is evident that concern over the age hierarchy, over the problems of maintaining appropriate behaviour in different age groups, and of ensuring the authority of older people over younger ones were all firmly embedded in Tudor and Stuart social comment.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
K. V. Thomas, ‘Age and Authority in Early Modem England’, Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 62 (1976), pp. 205–48. The issue of youth is discussed fully in
P. Griffiths, ‘Some Aspects of the Social History of Youth in Early Modern England, with Particular Reference to the Period, c.1590-c.1640’ (unpublished University of Cambridge Ph.D. Thesis, 1992); and in
P. Griffiths, Youth and Authority: Formative Experiences in England, 1560–1640 (Oxford, 1996).
E. A. Wrigley and R. S. Schofield, The Population History of England, 1541–1871: A Reconstruction (Cambridge, 1981), pp. 528–9 (table A3.1).
On social hierarchy and English witch trials, see K V. Thomas, Religion and the Decline of Magic: Studies in Popular Beliefs in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century England (London, 1971), esp. ch. 16 (The Making of a Witch’); and
A. Macfarlane, Witchcraft in Tudor and Stuart England: A Regional and Comparative Study (London, 1970). On gender, see
J. A. Sharpe, ‘Witchcraft and Women in Seventeenth-Century England; Some Northern Evidence’, Continuity and Change, vol. 6 (1991), pp. 179–99.
The Salem trials have attracted a considerable literature, the most useful work being perhaps P. Boyer and S. Nissenbaum, Salem Possessed: The Social Origins of the Salem Witch Trials (Cambridge, Mass., 1974). For a more recent discussion of this episode, set firmly in the context of magical and related beliefs, see
R. Godbeer, The Devil’s Dominion: Magic and Religion in Early New England (Cambridge, 1992), ch. 6 (The Rape of a Whole Colony: The 1692 Witch Hunt’).
B. Ankarloo, ‘Sweden: The Mass Burnings (1688–76)’, in B. Ankarloo and G. Henningsen (eds), Early Modern European Witchcraft: Centres and Peripheries (Oxford, 1990), pp. 285–318;
H. C. E. Midelfort, Witch Hunting in South Western Germany, 1562–1684: The Social and Intellectual Foundations (Stanford, 1972), p. 140. It should be noted that these Swedish and German cases involved children as alleged witches as well as accusers.
The calculations for the Home Circuit are based on materais printed in C. L. Ewen, Witch Hunting and Witch Trials (London, 1929), pp. 200–52; for the East Anglian trials, see
J. A. Sharpe, ‘The Devil in East Anglia: The Matthew Hopkins Trials Reconsidered’, in J. Barry et al. (eds), Witchcraft in Early Modern Europe: Studies in Culture and Belief (Cambridge, 1996); for the Northern Circuit, see Sharpe, ‘Witchcraft and Women’, 189.
For two essays touching on this literature, see N. Smith, ‘A Child Prophet: Martha Hatfield as The Wise Virgin’, and G. Avery, ‘The Puritans and Their Heirs’, both in G. Avery and J. Briggs (eds), Children and Their Books: A Celebration of the Work of Iona and Peter Opie (Oxford, 1989), pp. 79–94, 95–118.
For the Warboys case, see The Most Strange and Admirable Discoverie of the Three Witches of Warboys Arraigned, Convicted and Executed at the Assizes at Huntingdon (London, 1583). The works relating to Darrell’s activities are listed and discussed in C. H. Richert, The Case of John Darrett: Minister and Exorcist (Gainsville, 1962). Materials relating to Mary Glover are collected in
M. MacDonald (ed.), Witchcraft and Hysteria in Elizabethan London: Edward Jordan and the Mary Glover Case (London, 1990). Anne Gunter’s simulated possession is discussed in
C. L. Ewen, Witchcraft in the Star Chamber (privately pub., 1938), ch. 6 (‘A Berkshire “Demoniac” ‘), while the Star Chamber investigation of the case is in PRO STAC 8/4/10. For the sufferings of the Fairfax children,
see William Grainge (ed.), Daemonologia: A Discourse on Witchcraft as it was Acted in the Family of Mr Edward Fairfax of Fuyston in the Younty of York, in the Year 1621. Along With the Only Two Eclogues of the Same Author Known to be in Existence (Harrogate, 1882). There are a number of modern works dealing with the phenomenon of demonic possession in this period, of which
D. P. Walker, Unclean Spirits: Possession and Exorcism in France and England in the Late Sixteenth and Early Seventeenth Centuries (Philadelphia, 1981) constitutes perhaps the most useful discussion. For a more recent discussion of possession in its Elizabethan English context, see
F. W. Brownlow, Shakespeare, Harsnett and the Devils of Denham (Cranbury, N.J., 1993).
S. Greenblatt, Shakespearean Negotiations (Oxford, 1988), p. 103.
J. Demos, Entertaining Satan: Witchcraft and the Culture of Early New England (New York, 1982), p. 99. In addition to Demos’swork on colonial America, a number of historians have turned their attention to the psychiatrical and broader medical aspects of possession cases. See e.g.
David Harley, ‘Mental Illness, Magical Medicine and the Devil in Northern England, 1650–1700’, in R. French and D. Wear (eds), The Medical Revolution of the Seventeenth Century (Cambridge, 1989), pp. 114–44;
M. MacDonald, ‘Religion, Social Change and Psychological Healing in England, 1600–1800’, in W.J. Sheils (ed.), The Church and Healing, Studies in Church History, vol. 19 (Oxford, 1982). pp. 101–25; and
Ronald C. Sawyer, ‘“Strangely Handled in All Her Lyms”: Witchcraft and Healing in Jacobean England’, Journal of Sodal History, vol. 23 (1988–9), pp. 461–86.
M. L. Starkey, The Devil in Massachusetts: A Modern Enquiry into the Salem Witch Trials (London, 1952). For a more recent discussion of the possible usefulness of modern psychoanalytical ideas in the study of early modern witchcraft, see
L. Roper, ‘Witchcraft and Fantasy in Early Modern Germany’, History Workshop Journal, vol. 32 (1991), pp. 19–43. Dr Roper’s ideas on this subject are developed further in
Lyndal Roper, Oedipus and the Devil: Witchcraft, Sexuality and Religion in Early Modern Europe (London, 1994). Further light on this approach will doubdessly be shed by Miranda Chaytor’s research in progress on north eastern English sources.
For a good recent discussion, see I. M. Lewis, Ecstatic Religion: A Study of Shamanism and Spirit Possession, 2nd edn (London, 1989), ch. 4 (‘Strategies of Marginal Attack: Protest and its Containment’).
Boyer and Nissenbaum, Salem Possessed, pp. 215–16. On methodism, see the references to possession in Bristol in 1739, and the events at Everton in Bedfordshire in 1759; N. Curnock (ed.), The Journal of the Rev. John Wesley, 8 vols (London, 1909–16), vol. 11, pp. 180, 190, 299–301; vol. IV, pp. 333–42.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1996 J. A. Sharpe
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sharpe, J.A. (1996). Disruption in the Well-Ordered Household: Age, Authority, and Possessed Young People. In: Griffiths, P., Fox, A., Hindle, S. (eds) The Experience of Authority in Early Modern England. Themes in Focus. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24834-6_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24834-6_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59884-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24834-6
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)