Neutrality and Professionalism in the Public Service

  • Demetrios Argyriades


In almost every part of the world, attacks against bureaucracy have reached new peaks of intensity but are often little more than rationalizations for a persistent drive to arrest and reverse the historical process which led to the development of the administrative state. Such attacks call into question two fundamental concepts that have been at the centre of civil service reforms for close to two hundred years: neutrality and professionalism in the service of the State.


Civil Society Civil Service Administrative State Administrative Reform Public Administration Review 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. ABERBACH, J.D., R.D. PUTNAM & B.A. ROCKMAN (1981) Bureaucrats and Politicians in Western Democracies, Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  2. ABERBACH, J.D. & B.A. ROCKMAN (1994) Bureaucracy: Control, Responsiveness and Performance, Paper prepared for the Second International Covico Conference, SUNY, Albany, 17-20 March.Google Scholar
  3. ANECHIARICO, F. (1994) Vision of Corruption Control and the Evolution of American Public Administration, Public Administration, Vol. 54, No. 5, September/October, pp. 465-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ARGYRIADES, D. (1976) Neutralité ou Engagement Politique: l’Expérience de la Fonction Publique en Grande Bretagne, 1854-1968, Bulletin de l’IlAP, Nos. 38 & 40, avr-juin et oct-dec, pp. 277-309 & 25-55 resp.Google Scholar
  5. ARGYRIADES, D. (1982) Reconsidering Bureaucracy as Ideology, in G. Caiden & H. Siedentopf (eds), Strategies for Administrative Reform, Lexington, MA, D.C. Heath.Google Scholar
  6. ARGYRIADES, D. (1986) The Adaptation of Government to Economic Change, in Economic Change and Administrative Reform, XXth International Congress of Administrative Sciences in Amman, Jordan, published by the International Institute of Administrative Sciences, London.Google Scholar
  7. ARGYRIADES, D. (1991) Bureaucracy and Debureaucratization, in A. Faraz-mand (ed.) Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  8. ATHANASSOPOULOS, D. (1983) He Hellenike Dioikesis, Athens, Papatzis.Google Scholar
  9. AVINERI, S. (1986) Hegel’s Theory of the Modern State, London, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. BUTLER, R. (1993) The Evolution of the Civil Service, Public Administration, Vol. 71, No. 3, pp. 394-406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. BUTLER, R. (1994) Reinventing British Government, in ‘Reinventing Government: a Symposium,’ Public Administration, Vol. 72, No. 2, pp. 263-73, Summer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. CAIDEN, G.E. (1969) Administrative Reforms, Chicago, IH., AldineGoogle Scholar
  13. CAIDEN G.E. (1991) Administrative Reform Comes of Age, New York, De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CHAPMAN, B. (1963) The Profession of Government, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  15. CHEVALIER, J. (1971) Le Service Public, Paris, Dossiers Themis, PUF.Google Scholar
  16. CLEVELAND, H. (1985) The Twilight of Hierarchy: Speculations on the Global Information Society, Public Administration Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, pp. 185-95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. COHEN, S. &W. EIMICKE(1995) The New Effective Public Manager: Achieving Success in a Changing Government, San Francisco, Cai., Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  18. DANOPOULOS, C. (1991) Greek Bureaucracy and Administration: The Persistent Failure of Reform, in A. Farazmand (ed.) Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  19. DIAMANDOUROS, N. (1983) Greek Political Culture in Transition, in R. Clogg (ed.) Greece in the 1980s, London, Macmillan, pp. 43-69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DROR, Y. (1986) Policy Making Under Adversity, New Brunswick, NJ, Transaction Books.Google Scholar
  21. DROR, Y. (1993) Statecraft as Fuzzy Gambling with History, Future’s Research Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3, Fall, p. 103.Google Scholar
  22. DROR, Y. (1993) Policy Professionalism as a Vocational Calling, Policy Studies Journal, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp 6-13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. DROR, Y. (1993) Public Policy Analysis and Development, Improving Public Policy Analysis: Study Material for Top Executives, New York, United Nations ST/TCD/SERE. 17.Google Scholar
  24. DROR, Y. (1994) Basic Concepts in Advanced Policy Sciences, Encyclopaedia of Policy Studies, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  25. ESMAN, M.J. (1980) Development Assistance in Public Administration: Requiem or Renewal, Public Administration Review, 40 (5), September/October, pp. 426-31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. FINER, H. (1929) The Civil Service in the Modern State: Discipline and Rights, Public Administration.Google Scholar
  27. FOLETT, M.P. (1925) Voluntary Retirement ofMatian Civil Servants, Paper to XXth International Congress of Administrative Sciences, Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  28. GARCIA-ZAMOR, J.C. (1986) Voluntary Retirement ofMatian Civil Servants, Paper to XXth International Congress of Administrative Sciences, Amman, Jordan.Google Scholar
  29. GERTH, H.H. & W. MILLS (1957) From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  30. GIERKE, OTTO (1960) Natural Law and the Theory of Society 1500-1800, Boston, Mass., Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  31. GOULD, DAVID J. (1991) Administrative Corruption: Incidence, Causes and Remedial Strategies in Ali Farazmand (ed.) Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, New York, Marcel Dekker, pp. 467–80.Google Scholar
  32. GRAY, A. & B. JENKINS (1995) From Public Administration to Public Management: Reassessing a Revolution?, in R.A.W. Rhodes (ed.) British Public Administration: the State of the Discipline, London, Blackwell Pubi.Google Scholar
  33. GREEN, R.T., L.F. KELLER & G. WAMSLEY (1993) Reconstituting a Profession for Public Administration, Public Administration Review, Nov-Dec, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 516-24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. GRÉGOIRE, R. (1954) The French Civil Service, Brussels, International Institute of Administrative Sciences.Google Scholar
  35. HAYEK, F. A. (1944) The Road to Serfdom, London, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  36. HECLO, H. (1984) A Comment on the Future of the U.S. Civil Service, in B.L.R. Smith (ed.) The Higher Civil Service in Europe and Canada, Washington, DC, The Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  37. HEGEL, G.W. (1942) The Philosophy of Right, translated by T.M. Knox,Google Scholar
  38. HEGEL, G.W. (1956) The Philosophy of History, Translated by J. Sibree with an Introduction by C.J. Friedrich, Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. HESSE, J.J. (1993) Administrative Transformation in Central and Eastern Europe, Public Administration, Vol. 71, No. 112.Google Scholar
  40. HUGHES, E. (1949) Sir Charles Trevelyan and Civil Service Reform, English Historical Review, 64:72 et seq.Google Scholar
  41. JACOBY, H. (1973) The Bureaucratization of the World, translated by G. Kanes, Berkeley, CA, University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. KIEL, D.L. (1994) Managing Chaos and Complexity in Government, San Francisco, CA, Yossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. KONDYLIS, V. (1994) Le principe de neutralité dans la fonction publique, Paris, L.G.D.J.Google Scholar
  44. LASKI, H.J. (1927) Authority in the Modem State, Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  45. LASKI, H.J. (1933) Democracy in Crisis, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  46. LASKI, H.J. (1935) The State in Theory and Practice, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  47. LASKI, H.J. (1938) Parliamentary Government in England: A Commentary, London, Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
  48. LEE, J. (1921) The Psychology of a Civil Servant, The Civil Servant and his Profession, London, The Society of Civil Servants.Google Scholar
  49. LE VINE, C. (1986) The Federal Government in the Year 2001: Administrative Legacies of the Reagan Years, Public Administration Review, May/June, Vol. 46, No. 3, p. 196.Google Scholar
  50. MAKRYDIMITRIS, A. (1992) He Organosis tes Kyvernisis, Athens, Sakkoula.Google Scholar
  51. MASCARENHAS, R.C. (1993) Building an Enterprise Culture in the Public Sector: Reform of the Public Sector in Australia, Britain and New Zealand, Public Administration Review July/August, Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 319-27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. MOUZELIS, N. (1978) Neo-Hellenike Koinonia: Opseis Hypanaptyxes, Athens, Exandas.Google Scholar
  53. PAPPAS, S. (1993) Towards a European Public Service, Administration, Vol. 41, No. 2, Summer, pp. 120-127.Google Scholar
  54. PETER, B.G. & D.J. SAVOIE (1994) Civil Service Reform: Misdiagnosing the Patient, Public Administration Review, September/October, Vol. 54, No. 5, pp. 418-425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. PINTER, W.M. & D.K. ROUNEY (1980) Russian Officialdom: The Bureaucratization of Russian Society from the Seventeenth to the Twentieth Century, Chapel Hill, NC, University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. PLOWDEN, W. (1985) What Prospects for the Civil Service?, Public Administration, Vol. 63, No. 4, Winter, p. 408.Google Scholar
  57. RIDLEY, F.F. (1982) Administrative Theory and Administrative Reform, in G.E. Caiden, & H. Siedentopf (eds) Strategies for Administrative Reform, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  58. RIGGS, F.W. (1966) Thailand: The Modernization of a Bureaucratic Polity, Honolulu, Hawaii, East-West Centre Press.Google Scholar
  59. RIGGS, F.W. (1988) Bureaucratic Politics in the U.S.: Benchmarks for Comparison, Governance, 1 (4) pp. 343-79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. RIGGS, F.W. (1991) Bureaucratic Links Between Administration and Politics in A. Farazmand (ed.) Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  61. RIGGS, F.W. (1992) Fragility of Third World Regimes, Honolulu, HI, University of Hawaii (unpublished).Google Scholar
  62. RIGGS, F.W. (1993) Bureaucracy: A Profound Puzzle for Présidentialisme Honolulu HI, University of Hawaii (unpublished).Google Scholar
  63. ROURKE, F. (1992) Responsiveness and Neutral Competence in Public Administration Review, November/December, Vol. 52, No. 6, pp. 539-546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. ROUSSEAU, J.-J. (1762) Du Contrat Social ou Principes de Droit Politique, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  65. SAKAMOTO, M. (1991) Public Administration in Japan, in Ali Farazmand (ed.) Handbook of Comparative and Development Public Administration, New York, Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
  66. SAMATAS, M. (1994) Debureaucratization Failure in Post-dictatorial Greece: A Sociopolitical Control Approach, Journal of Modem Greek Studies, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 187-218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. SHAFRITZ, J.M. et al. (1992) Personnel Management in Government Politics and Process, 4th edition, New York, Marcel Dekke.Google Scholar
  68. SOTIROPOULLOS, D. (1991) State and Party: the Greek State Bureaucracy and the PASOK, 1981-1989, Ph.D. Dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
  69. SPANOU, K. (1990) Ekloges kai demosia dioikesis: he eklogike energopoiese ton endodoiketikon pelateiakon mechanismon, Ekloges kai kommata stin Dekaetia tou exinda, Athens, Themelio.Google Scholar
  70. STILLMAN II, R.J. (1990) The Peculiar Stateless Origins of American Public Administration and the Consequences for Government Today, Public Administration Review March-April, Vol. 50, No. 2, pp. 156-67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. STONE, D. (1982) Birth of ASPA: A Collective Effort in Institution-Building in J. W. Fesler (ed.) American Public Administration: Patterns of the Past, Washington, DC, ASPA.Google Scholar
  72. SULEIMAN, E.N. (1974) Politics, Power and Bureaucracy in France: The Administrative Elite, Princeton, NJ, Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  73. TIMSIT, G. & C. WIENER (1980) Le Modèle Marxiste d’Administration, in L. Boulet (ed.) Science et Action Administratives: Melanges Georges Langrod, Paris, Editions d’Organisation.Google Scholar
  74. URWICK, L. (1939) Bureaucracy and Democracy, Public Administration, Vol. 14.Google Scholar
  75. VOSLENSKY, MICHAEL (1980) La Nomenklatura, Paris, P. Belfond.Google Scholar
  76. WHICKER, M.L., R.A. STRICKLAND & D. OLSHEFSKI (1993) The Troublesome Cleft: Public Administration and Political Science, Public Administration Review, Nov-Dec, Vol. 53, No. 6, pp. 531-41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. WILDAVSKY, A. (1988) Ubiquitous Anomie: Public Service in an Era of Ideological Dissensus, Public Administration Review, Vol. 45, No. 4.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© the estate of the late Haile K. Asmerom 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Demetrios Argyriades

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations