Abstract
The position of the referendum in the Norwegian constitution is easily stated: no written rules exist whatsoever. The constitution unambiguously adopts the representative system, with the Storting (parliament) as the centre of democratically based power. However, legal interpreters can make even silent texts speak. Thus, the formal vacuum has been filled by interpretations and practice; this has not encompassed either the compulsory or the binding referendum variant, but has created an undisputed opening for the ad hoc and consultative forms. The Storting is empowered, by simple majority, to consult the voters at any time and on any issue. But it is not authorised to delegate to them the final decision on any topic.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bjørklund, Tor, 1982. “The demand for referendum: when does it arise and when does it succeed?”, Scandinavian Political Studies, new series, 5:3, pp. 237–59.
Bjørklund, Tor, 1992. Referendums in Norway. Oslo: Institute of Social Research.
Bjørklund, Tor, 1995. Public Opinion towards Membership in the EU: the case of Norway. Oslo: mimeo.
Bogdanor, Vernon, 1994. “Western Europe”, pp. 24–97 in David Butler and Austin Ranney (eds), Referendums around the World: the growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Gleditsch, Nils Petter and Ottar Hellevik, 1977. Kampen om EF. Oslo: NAVF.
Miller, Kenneth E., 1982. “Policy-making by referendum: the Danish experience”, West European Politics 5:1, pp. 54–67.
Nilson, Sten Sparre, 1972. Politisk avstand ved norske folkeavstemninger. Oslo: Gyldendal.
Nilson, Sten Sparre, 1978. “Scandinavia”, pp. 169–92 in David Butler and Austin Ranney (eds), Referendums: a comparative study of practice and theory. Washington: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Pettersen, Per Arnt et al., 1995. The 1994 Referendum in Norway: continuity and change. University of Trondheim, mimeo.
Rasch, Bjørn Erik and Knut Midgaard, 1994. Representativt Demokrati: spilleregler under debatt. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Ruin, Olof, 1993. Folkomrøstningar och europeisk integrationsbeslut, genomførande och konsekvenser: forskningsprosjekt ved statsveten-skapliga institutionen. Stockholm: Stockholms universitet.
Smith, Gordon, 1976. “The functional properties of the referendum”, European Journal of Political Research 4:1, pp. 1–21.
Suksi, Markku, 1993. Bringing in the People: a comparison of constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Wyller, Thomas Chr., 1992. Skal folket bestemme? Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
Wyller, Thomas Chr., 1993. “Folkeavstemning om EF: et ‘beslutnings-råd’”, pp. 81–93 in Nils Asbjørnsen and Gunnar Vogt (eds), EF, Norge og 1990-årene. Institute for Political Science, University of Oslo, Research Report 02/93.
Wyller, Thomas Chr., 1994. The Referendum as a Political Process. Oslo: Institute of Political Science, University of Oslo, Working Paper 03/94.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wyller, T.C. (1996). Norway: six exceptions to the rule. In: Gallagher, M., Uleri, P.V. (eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24796-7_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24796-7_9
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-67018-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24796-7
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)