Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter we shall review the patterns outlined in the preceding chapters and ask whether evidence from a number of European countries enables us to draw any general conclusions about the use, the consequences, the benefits, the dangers and finally the future of the referendum phenomenon. First, we need to sum up briefly the provisions made for the referendum in European constitutions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Aguilera de Prat, Cesáreo R., 1994. “L’uso del referendum nella Spagna democratica”, pp. 244–57 in Mario Caciagli and Pier Vincenzo Uleri (eds), Democrazie e Referendum. Roma and Bari: Editori Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitken, Don, 1978. “Australia”, pp. 123–37 in Butler and Ranney (1978a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber, Benjamin R., 1984. Strong Democracy: participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, Brian, 1989. Democracy, Power and Justice: essays in political theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bealey, Frank, 1988. Democracy in the Contemporary State. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørklund, Tor, 1982. “The demand for referendum: when does it arise and when does it succeed?”, Scandinavian Political Studies, new series, 5:3, pp. 237–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaustein, Albert P. and Gisbert H. Flanz, annual. Constitutions of the Countries of the World. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobbio, Norberto, 1987. The Future of Democracy: a defence of the rules of the game. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, Vernon, 1981. The People and the Party System: the referendum and electoral reform in British politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogdanor, Vernon, 1994. “Western Europe”, pp. 24–97 in Butler and Austin Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohnet, Iris and Bruno S. Frey, 1994. “Direct-democratic rules: the role of discussion”, Kyklos 47:3, pp. 341–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, Ian, 1993. “Direct democracy: setting appropriate terms of debate”, pp. 136–55 in David Held (ed.), Prospects for Democracy: north, south, east, west. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnheim, John, 1985. Is Democracy Possible: the alternatives to electoral politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney (eds), 1978a. Referendums: a comparative study of practice and theory. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney, 1978b. “Practice”, pp. 3–21 in Butler and Ranney (1978a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney, 1978c. “Summing up”, pp. 221–6 in Butler and Ranney (1978a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney (eds), 1994a. Referendums around the World: the growing use of direct democracy. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney, 1994b. “Theory”, pp. 11–23 in Butler and Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, David and Austin Ranney, 1994c. “Conclusion”, pp. 258–63 in Butler and Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona, J. J., 1994. The Maltese Constitution and Constitutional History since 1813. San Gwann: Publishers Enterprises Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, Thomas E., 1989. Direct Democracy: the politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Darcy, R. and Michael Laver, 1990. “Referendum dynamics and the Irish divorce amendment”, Public Opinion Quarterly 54:1, pp. 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzmaurice, John, 1995. “The 1994 referenda on EU membership in Austria and Scandinavia: a comparative analysis”, Electoral Studies 14:2, pp. 226–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, Mark, Cees van der Eijk and Michael Marsh, 1995. “Referendum outcomes and trust in government: public support for Europe in the wake of Maastricht”, West European Politics 18:3, pp. 101–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver and Peter Mair, 1995. Representative Government in Modern Europe. New York and London: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansard Society, 1981. Referendums: guidelines for the future. London: Hansard Society for Parliamentary Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, Paul, 1990. Representative Democracy and its Limits. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Colin A., 1994. “Australia and New Zealand”, pp. 154–73 in Butler and Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobach, Kris W., 1993. The Referendum: direct democracy in Switzerland. Aldershot: Dartmouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobach, Kris W., 1994. “Switzerland”, pp. 98–153 in Butler and Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, Arend, 1984. Democracies: patterns of majoritarian and consensus government in twenty-one countries. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLean, Iain, 1989. Democracy and New Technology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magleby, David B., 1994. “Direct legislation in the United States”, pp. 218–57 in Butler and Ranney (1994a).

    Google Scholar 

  • Maine, Sir Henry Sumner, 1885. Popular Government. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mair, Peter, 1995. “Political parties, popular legitimacy and public privilege”, West European Politics 18:3, pp. 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marradi, Alberto, 1976. “Italy’s referendum on divorce: survey and ecological evidence analyzed”, European Journal of Political Research 4:1, pp. 115–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michels, Robert, 1959. Political Parties: a sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy. New York: Dover Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perifanaki Rotolo, Virginia, 1994. “Fra autoritarismo e democrazia: la difficile istituzionalizzazione del referendum in Grecia”, pp. 231–43 in Mario Caciagli and Pier Vincenzo Uleri (eds), Democrazie e Referendum. Roma and Bari: Editori Laterza

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranney, Austin (ed.), 1981. The Referendum Device. Washington DC and London: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roche, Julian, 1994. No Referenda Please — we’re British. London: The Bow Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1987. The Theory of Democracy Revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartori, Giovanni, 1994. Comparative Constitutional Engineering: an inquiry into structures, incentives and outcomes. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, David O. and Jack Citrin, 1982. Tax Revolt: something for nothing in California. Cambridge, Mass., and London: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, Clifford D., 1911. The Case against the Referendum, Fabian Tract no. 155. London: The Fabian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoddart, Jane T., 1910. Against the Referendum. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suksi, Markku, 1993. Bringing in the People: a comparison of constitutional forms and practices of the referendum. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Martinus Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, Palle, 1994. “The Danes and direct democracy”, paper presented at the workshop on “The referendum experience in Europe”, European Consortium for Political Research Joint Sessions, Madrid, 17–22 April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wass, Douglas, 1994. “Referenda — a critical view”, pp. 64–5 in Jack Lively and Adam Lively (eds), Democracy in Britain: a reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, M. (1996). Conclusion. In: Gallagher, M., Uleri, P.V. (eds) The Referendum Experience in Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24796-7_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics