The Making of a Discourse of Race



‘I discern two sorts of inequality in the human species’, wrote Rousseau in his Discourse on Inequality. The first was ‘natural or physical’ which pertained to biological differences between individuals — ‘differences in age, health, strength of body and qualities of the mind and soul’. The second type of inequality was that between social groups. This, Rousseau argued, was ‘moral or political inequality’ which was ‘established, or at least authorised, by the consent of men.’ ‘Such inequality’, he wrote, ‘consists of the different privileges that some enjoy to the prejudice of others — such as their being richer, more honoured, more powerful than others, and even getting themselves obeyed by others.’1 One way to understand the narrative of race is as the story of how the second type of inequality became reduced to the first — in other words, how social inequalities became regarded as natural ones. It is through the conflation of social and natural inequality that the contradiction between the universalist ideology of capitalist society and the particularist reality of capitalist social relations becomes grasped in the discourse of race.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 2.
    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, ‘Manifesto of the Communist Party’ in Marx and Engels, Selected Works ( London: Lawrence & Wishart, 1968 ) p. 38.Google Scholar
  2. 3.
    Introduction’ to Roy Porter and Mikulas Teich (eds), Romanticism in National Context (Cambridge University Press, 1988) pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
  3. 4.
    Cited in Russel Kirk, The Conservative Mind ( London: Faber & Faber, 1954 ) p. 47.Google Scholar
  4. 7.
    Edmund Burke, ‘Reform of Representation in the House of Commons’, in Collected Works, (London: Rivington, 1815–27) vol. VI, p. 141.Google Scholar
  5. 10.
    Edmund Burke, Reflections on the Revolution in France (Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1968 [orig. pub. 1790]) p. 106.Google Scholar
  6. 16.
    Cited in Claude Blanckaert, ‘On the Origins of French Ethnology’, in George W. Stocking (ed.), Bones, Bodies and Behaviour: Essays on Biological Anthropology (History of Anthropology, vol. 5 ) ( Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press, 1988 ) p. 26.Google Scholar
  7. 19.
    Johannes Fabian, Time and the Other: How Anthropology Makes its Object ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1983 ) p. 28.Google Scholar
  8. 20.
    Edward Said, Culture and Imperialism ( London: Chatto & Windus, 1993 ) p. 120.Google Scholar
  9. 22.
    Daniel Pick, Faces of Degeneration: A European Disorder, c1848–1918 (Cambridge University Press, 1989) pp. 38, 39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 23.
    Eugen Weber, Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernisation of Rural France 1870–1914 (Stanford University Press, 1976).Google Scholar
  11. 27.
    Count Arthur de Gobineau, The Inequality of Races trans Adrian Collins (Los Angeles: Noontide Press, 1966 ) p. 5.Google Scholar
  12. 30.
    Cited in Georg Lucaks, The Destruction of Reason ( London: Merlin, 1980 ) p. 676.Google Scholar
  13. 32.
    Cited in Gertrude Himmelfarb, The Idea of Poverty: England in the Early Industrial Age ( London: Faber & Faber, 1984 ) p. 362.Google Scholar
  14. 33.
    Cited in Greta Jones, Social Darwinism and English Thought: The Interaction Between Biological and Social Theory ( New Jersey: Harvester, 1980 ) p. 42.Google Scholar
  15. 40.
    Nancy Stepan, The Idea of Race in Science: Great Britain 1800–1960 ( London: Macmillan, 1982 ), p. 4.Google Scholar
  16. 43.
    William Smellie, The Philosophy of Natural History ( Boston: Brown, Taggard & Chase, 1885 ) pp. 308–9.Google Scholar
  17. 44.
    Douglas A. Lorimer, Colour, Class and the Victorians: English Attitudes to the Negro in the Mid-Nineteenth Century (Leicester University Press, 1978 ) pp. 67–68.Google Scholar
  18. 49.
    Cited in Asa Briggs, ‘Middle Class Consciousness in English Politics 1760–1846’, Past and Present, no. 9 (Apr. 1956).Google Scholar
  19. 50.
    Henry Mayhew, London Labour and the London Poor, ed. by John D. Rosenberg (New York: Dover, 1968) vol. 1, p. 1.Google Scholar
  20. 52.
    Report on the Sanitary Condition of the Labouring Population of Great Britain, ed. M. W. Flinn (Edinburgh: 1965) p. 202.Google Scholar
  21. 55.
    Thomas Huxley, ‘On the Methods and Results of Ethnology’, Proceedings of the Royal Institute of Great Britain IV (1862–66) pp. 461–3.Google Scholar
  22. 56.
    Bernard Semmel, The Governor Eyre Controversy ( London: McGibbon & Kee, 1962 ) pp. 134–5.Google Scholar
  23. 57.
    F. D. Lugard, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (London: William Blackwood & Sons, 1922 ) pp. 18, 69, 88.Google Scholar
  24. 63.
    V. G. Kiernan, The Lords of Humankind: European Attitudes Towards the Outside World in the Imperial Age ( London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1969 ) p. 316.Google Scholar
  25. 64.
    Cited in Jan Nederveen Pieterse, Empire and Emancipation: Power and Liberation on a World Scale ( London: Pluto, 1989 ) p. 254.Google Scholar
  26. 65.
    Gustav LeBon, The Psychology of Peoples (New York: G. E. Stechert, 1912 [orig. pub. 1894]) pp. 29, 43.Google Scholar
  27. 66.
    Henrika Kuklick, The Savage Within: The Social History of British Anthropology 1885–1945 (Cambridge University Press, 1991) pp. 85–6.Google Scholar
  28. 69.
    Cited in Allan Chase, The Legacy of Malthus: The Social Costs of the New Scientific Racism ( Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1980 ) p. 14.Google Scholar
  29. 70.
    J. G. Spurzheim, ‘Phrenological Note by Dr Spurzheim’, Phrenological Journal, no. 6 (1829–30).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kenan Malik 1996

Authors and Affiliations

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations