Skip to main content

The Strategic Geography of the Near East

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Making of Orthodox Byzantium, 600–1025

Part of the book series: New Studies in Medieval History ((NSMH))

  • 267 Accesses

Abstract

Taking any modern map of the Near East and its neighbours large enough to show the whole region from the steppes of the Ukraine and southern Russia in the north to the deserts of Arabia in the south, and from the Balkans and Egypt in the west to the borders of Afghanistan in the east, six major geographical blocs will stand out: the Balkan peninsula, the steppes, the Fertile Crescent, the desert, and the plateaux of Anatolia and Iran. To understand the history of the Byzantine state and its place in the Near East it is essential to have a basic knowledge of the geography of these blocs and how they relate to each other. With so few written sources available geography becomes even more important than usual in setting the parameters to a convincing interpretation of the past.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  • For the Balkans, Obolensky, The Byzantine Commonwealth is very helpful and clear; N. G. L. Hammond, A History of Macedonia, I (Oxford, 1972) provides useful information on the Via Egnatia that remains relevant for the middle ages.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Cvijič, La Peninsule Balkanique (Paris, 1918) is a classic work of descriptive geography that can be extremely useful to the medieval historian, as can the volumes of the Geographical Handbook Series (Naval Intelligence Division, London): Greece, 3 vols (1944–5); Jugoslavia, 3 vols (1944–5); Albania (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  • For the steppes, Obolensky’s book is again a good introduction. On the nomad world, see A. M. Khazanov, Nomads and the Outside World, tr. J. Crookenden (Cambridge, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Sinor, ‘Horse and Pasture in Inner Asian History’, Oriens extremus, XIX (1972), 171–83

    Google Scholar 

  • plus R. Tapper, ‘Anthropologists, Historians, and Tribespeople on Tribe and State Formation in the Middle East’, in Tribes and State Formation in the Middle East, ed. P. S. Khoury and J. Kostiner (London, 1991), pp. 48–73, which serves to caution historians too keen to apply anthropological models.

    Google Scholar 

  • For the Near East in general, see J. M. Wagstaff, The Evolution of the Middle Eastern Landscapes (London, 1985)

    Google Scholar 

  • and X. de Planhol, Les fondements geographiques de l’histoire de l’Islam (Paris, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  • On Iran and Iraq, P. Christensen, The Decline of Iranshahr (Copenhagen, 1993) is important.

    Google Scholar 

  • For Anatolia in particular, the Geographical Handbook Series: Turkey 2 vols (London, 1942–3) is a useful source of basic geographical information about terrain, routes and climate. Also a good introduction, and one of the few on this list likely to make you laugh, is J. D. Howard-Johnston and N. Ryan, The Scholar and the Gypsy (London, 1992) — an account of travelling in Turkey in pursuit of Byzantine landscapes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Specifically on the vexed question of relations between the bedouin and the settled population of the Fertile Crescent, for work which stresses cooperation and co-existence see: L. E. Sweet, ‘Camel Raiding of North Arabian Bedouin: A Mechanism of Ecological Adaptation’, American Anthropologist, LXVII (1965), 1132–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. F. Graf, ‘Rome and the Saracens: Reassessing the Nomadic Menace’, in L’Arabie préislamique et son environnement historique et culturel, ed. T. Fahd (Leiden, 1989), pp. 341–400

    Google Scholar 

  • E. B. Banning, ‘Peasants, Pastoralists, and Pax Romana: Mutualism in the Highlands of Jordan’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, CCLXI (1986), 25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banning, ‘De Bello Paceque. A Reply to Parker’, ibid., CCLXV (1987), 52–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Not everyone is convinced: S. T. Parker, Romans and Saracens: A History of the Arabian Frontier (Winnona Lake, Ind., 1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, ‘Peasants, Pastoralists, and Pax Romana: A Different View’, Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, CCLXV (1987), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Lancaster, The Rwala Bedouin Revisited (Cambridge, 1981) is a classic study of a bedouin tribe which helps to put the problem in perspective.

    Google Scholar 

  • Also relevant is R. W. Bulliet, The Camel and Wheel (Cambridge, Mass., 1975) who arguably overstates his case, but the book is certainly highly readable.

    Google Scholar 

  • For the strategic implications of the Mediterranean Sea, J. H. Pryor, Geography, Technology and War (Cambridge, 1988) is lively and important.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 Mark Whittow

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Whittow, M. (1996). The Strategic Geography of the Near East. In: The Making of Orthodox Byzantium, 600–1025. New Studies in Medieval History. Red Globe Press, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24765-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24765-3_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Red Globe Press, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-49601-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24765-3

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics