Abstract
There are two basic ways in which to mount a general critique of a writer’s contribution to human thought. On the one hand, the paradigm within which the writer works may be taken for granted, with his or her ideas being assessed within that framework. On the other hand, the writer’s very framework may be questioned, in which case descent into detail may be redundant.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1996 Michael Schneider
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Schneider, M. (1996). Hobson as Economist: A Critique. In: J. A. Hobson. Contemporary Economists. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24750-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24750-9_7
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-24752-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24750-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Economics & Finance CollectionEconomics and Finance (R0)