Skip to main content

Antagonism or Equanimity: U.S. Multinationals and Regional Trading Blocs

  • Chapter
  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

Efforts to discuss with managers of U.S. multinational firms the possible emergence of a trading system based on regional blocs are generally met with a “big yawn.” This paper attempts to explain this rather surprising lack of concern on the part of managers. Indeed, with the recent emphasis on global strategies by multinational firms, one might expect managers to see such blocs as serious threats. In fact, rather than worrying about a threat, managers have tended to lend their support to efforts to negotiate regional free trade agreements, such as those among the United States, Canada and Mexico, along with their general support of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) negotiations.

Herbert F. Johnson Professor of International Management, Harvard Business School.

This article is adapted from “Conflict or Indifference: U.S Multinationals in a World of Regional Trading Blocs”, a study prepared as a part of the Research Programme on Globalization and Regionalization, headed by Charles Oman.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abraham, G. (1988), Foreign Direct Investment in Singapore, Foreign Direct Investment in the Asian and Pacific Region, Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antonelli, C. (1984), Multinational Firms, International Trade, and International Telecommunications, Information Economics and Policy, Vol.1, No.4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, V. B. and J. Tucker (1989), U.S. Foreign Trade Highlights, Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, C. and S. Ghoshal (1988), Organizing for Worldwide Effectiveness: The Transnational Solution, California Management Review, Vol.31, No.1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergsten, C. F. and E. M. Graham (1990), “Global Corporations and National Governments: Are Changes Needed in the International Economic and Political Order in Light of the Globalization of Business?”, mimeo, Institute for International Economics, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P. J. (1988), The Limits of Explanation: Testing the Internalization Theory of the Multinational Enterprise, Journal of International Business Studies, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Building Global Teamwork for Growth and Survival, Research Bulletin, No.228, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cray (1984), Control and Coordination in Multinational Corporations, Journal of International Business Studies, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, W. H. (1976), Patterns of FactorSaving Innovation in the Industrialized World, European Economic Review, Vol.8, No.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doz, Y. (1987), “International Industries: Fragmentation vs. Globalization”, in Bruce K. Guile and Harvey Brooke (eds.), Technology and Global Industry, Washington: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, P. F. (1986), The Changed World Economy, The McKinsey Quarterly, Autumn 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, John H. (1990), European Integration and Transatlantic Foreign Direct Investment: The Record Reassessed, Discussion Paper in International Investment and Business Studies, University of Reading, Department of Economics, Series B, Vol.III, 1990/921, No.144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egelhoff, William G., Strategy and Structure in Multinational Corporations: An Information Processing Approach, Administrative Sciences Quarterly, Vol.27, No.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, D. (1990), “Global Competition, New Information Technologies and International Technology Diffusion Implications for Industrial Latecomers”, mimeo, paper for the Conference on Technology and Competitiveness, OECD, Paris, 2427 June 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith, Jay R. (1973), Designing Complex Organizations, Reading, MA: AddisonWesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, C. (1986), Manufacturing Logistics Systems for a Competitive Global Strategy, Information Strategy: The Executive’s Journal, Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Julius, D. (1990), Global Companies and Public Policy, London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keegan, W. J. (1990), The Global Business and its Strategy in the 1990s: Issues, Opportunities, and Challenges, Advances in Telecommunications Management, Vol. 2, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogut, B. (1985), Designing Global Strategies, Sloan Management Review, Summer and Fall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, L. and Fong, P.E., (1991), Foreign Direct Investment and Industrialization in Malaysia, Singapore, Taiwan and Thailand, OECD Development Center, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, A. J., Ricks, D.A., and Roth, K., (1991), Globalization versus Regionalization: Which Way for the Multinationals?, Organizational Dynamics, Winter, Vol. 19, No.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oman, C. (1989) (et al.), New Forms of International Investment in Developing Country Industries: Mining, Petrochemicals, Automobiles, Textiles, Food, OECD Development Center, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (ed.) (1986), Competition in Global Industries, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, Michael E. (1990), The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York: The Free Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, D. A. and Dauman, J.V., (1989), Europessimism or Europhobia? U.S. Corporate Response to 1992, European Business Journal, Vol.1, No.3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shifting Patterns of U.S. Trade with Selected Developing Asian Economies, Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Vol.14, No.4, Winter 198990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stopford, J. M. and Wells, L.T., (1972) Managing the Multinational Enterprise, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist, December 8, 1990, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist, December 22, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Direct Investment Abroad: 1989 Benchmark Survey, Preliminary Results, Washington: US Department of Commerce, November 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Direct Investment Abroad: Operations of U.S. Companies and their Foreign Affiliates: Preliminary 1988 Estimates, Washington: U.S. Department of Commerce, July 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1971), Sovereignty at Bay, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1980), Gone are the Cash Cows of Yesteryear, Harvard Business Review, NovemberDecember.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, Louis T. Jr. (ed.) (1972), The Product Life Cycle and International Trade, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Centre for International Cooperation and Development

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wells, L.T. (1996). Antagonism or Equanimity: U.S. Multinationals and Regional Trading Blocs. In: Svetličič, M., Singer, H.W. (eds) The World Economy. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24695-3_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics