Advertisement

Vested Interests and Pressure Groups

  • H. T. Dickinson

Abstract

Many recent historians have stressed that there were two political worlds in eighteenth-century Britain. On the one hand, there was a narrow landed elite, composed of the aristocracy and the greater gentry. This remarkably cohesive and integrated group dominated the court, the cabinet, both houses of parliament and the administration of the counties. They regarded the possession of land as the essential qualification for those who desired to serve the king or to sit in parliament. The possession of landed property was also seen as the best means of attaching men to the interests of their country and of providing them with the independence, leisure and judgement needed to govern others. On the other hand, historians have also detected another political world which, if not entirely separate and distinct, at least sought to escape from the patronage of the aristocratic elite and was sometimes in conflict with it. This political world, both bourgeois and plebeian, existed outside the narrow confines of court, cabinet and parliament and flourished in urban areas. In the towns merchant oligarchies, popular radicalism or crowd demonstrations were largely beyond the control of the landed elite.1

Keywords

Eighteenth Century Vested Interest Pressure Group Slave Trade East India Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    E.P. Thompson, ‘Patrician Society, Plebeian Culture’, JSH, 7 (1974), 382–405;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. and E.P. Thompson, ‘Eighteenth-Century English Society: class struggle without class’, SocH, 3 (1978), 133–65.Google Scholar
  3. 2.
    Sheila Lambert (ed.), House of Commons Sessional Papers of the Eighteenth Century (2 vols, Wilmington, Delaware, 1975–6);Google Scholar
  4. and Frederick H. Spencer, Municipal Origins An Account of English Private Bill Legislation relating to Local Government, 1740–1835 (1911), pp. 38–41, 65–9.Google Scholar
  5. 3.
    Peter Fraser, ‘Public Petitioning and Parliament before 1832’, H, 46 (1961), 195–211.Google Scholar
  6. 4.
    J.R. Pole, Political Representation in England and the Origins of the American Republic (1966), pp. 442–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Patrick K. O’Brien, ‘The political economy of British taxation, 1660–1815’, EcHR, 2nd series, 41 (1988), 1–32.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    D.G. Barnes, A History of the English Corn Laws 1660–1846 (1930), pp. 23–116;Google Scholar
  9. and G.E. Mingay, English Landed Society in the Eighteenth Century (1963), chs 3 and 7.Google Scholar
  10. 8.
    Barnes, pp. 42–4; Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest (Philadelphia, 1970);Google Scholar
  11. and H.T. Dickinson, Walpole and the Whig Supremacy (1973), pp. 93–5.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    David Hume, Essays Moral Political and Literary (Oxford, 1963), pp. 58, 64–5.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edmund Burke, ‘Thoughts on the Cause of the Present Discontents’, in The Works of Edmund Burke (Bohn edn, 6 vols, 1854–6), i, 367. See also Part Hist, xvi (1813), 920–1.Google Scholar
  14. 16.
    Adam Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, eds R.A. Campbell and A.S. Skinner (2 vols, Oxford, 1976), i, 493; and Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest, p. 114.Google Scholar
  15. 22.
    P.G.M. Dickson, The Financial Revolution in England (1967), pp. 15–35;Google Scholar
  16. and W.A. Speck, ‘The Conflict in Society’, in Geoffrey Holmes (ed.), Britain after the Glorious Revolution 1689–1714 (1969), pp. 135–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 23.
    Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest, p. 99; John Brooke, The House of Commons 1754–1790 (Oxford, 1964), pp. 220–30;Google Scholar
  18. J.M. Holzman, The Nabobs in England (New York, 1926), pp. 15–16;Google Scholar
  19. Lucy Sutherland, The East India Company in Eighteenth Century Politics (Oxford, 1952), pp. 58, 147, 219, 279–80;Google Scholar
  20. and H.V. Bowen, ‘“The Pests of Human Society”: Stockbrokers, Jobbers and Speculators in mid-eighteenth-century Britain’, H, 78 (1993), 38–53.Google Scholar
  21. 24.
    Lucy Sutherland, ‘The City of London in Eighteenth-Century Politics’, in Richard Pares and A.J.P. Taylor (eds), Essays presented to Sir Lewis Namier (1956), pp. 49–74; and P.G.M. Dickson, The Financial Revolution in England, ch. 1.Google Scholar
  22. 25.
    B.W. Hill, ‘The Change of Government and the “Loss of the City”, 1710–1711’, EcHR, 2nd series, 24 (1971), 395–413.Google Scholar
  23. 26.
    P.G.M. Dickson, The Financial Revolution in England, chs 5–6; Lucy Sutherland, ‘The City of London and the Devonshire-Pitt Administration 1756–7’, in Proceedings of the British Academy, 46 (1960), 147–93;Google Scholar
  24. and C.H. Philips, ‘The East India Company “Interest” and the English Government, 1783–4’, TRHS, 4th series, 20 (1937), 85–91.Google Scholar
  25. 31.
    John G. Sperling, The South Sea Company (Boston, 1962), ch. 6;Google Scholar
  26. Jean O. McLachlan, Trade and Peace with Old Spain 1667–1750 (Cambridge, 1940), ch. 4;Google Scholar
  27. Gerald B. Hertz, British Imperialism in the Eighteenth Century (1908), ch. 2;Google Scholar
  28. and Harold W.V. Temperley, ‘The Causes of the War of Jenkins’ Ear, 1739’, TRHS, 3rd series, 3 (1909), 197–236.Google Scholar
  29. 32.
    Lucy Sutherland, The East India Company in Eighteenth Century Politics, pp. 27–30; and Henry Horwitz, ‘The East India Trade, the Politicians, and the Constitution: 1689–1702’, JBS, 17 (1978), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 33.
    Gerald B. Hertz, ‘England and the Ostend Company’, EHR, 22 (1907), 255–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 35.
    C.H. Philips, ‘The East India Company “Interest” and the English Government, 1783–4’, TRHS, 4th series, 20 (1937), 83–101.Google Scholar
  32. 36.
    N.C. Hunt, ‘The Russia Company and the Government, 1730–42’, Oxford Slavonic Papers, 7 (1957), 27–65;Google Scholar
  33. Douglas K. Reading, The Anglo-Russian Commercial Treaty of 1734 (New Haven, 1938);Google Scholar
  34. and Alfred C. Wood, A History of the Levant Company (Oxford, 1935), pp. 146–7.Google Scholar
  35. 37.
    Glyndwr Williams, ‘The Hudson’s Bay Company and its Critics in the Eighteenth Century’, TRHS, 5th series, 20 (1970), 149–71; and Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest, pp. 78, 101, 139.Google Scholar
  36. 40.
    Glyndwr Williams, ‘The Hudson’s Bay Company...’, TRHS, 5th series, 20 (1970), 159–60, 164; and Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest, pp. 78–9, 102–3.Google Scholar
  37. 41.
    Lillian M. Penson, ‘The London West India Interest in the Eighteenth Century’, EHR, 36 (1921), 373–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. See also Lillian M. Penson, The Colonial Agents of the British West Indies (1924).Google Scholar
  39. 42.
    Richard B. Sheridan, ‘The Molasses Act and the Market Strategy of the British Sugar Planters’, JEcH, 17 (1957), 62–83.Google Scholar
  40. 43.
    Quoted in Lillian M. Penson, ‘The London West India Interest’, EHR, 36 (1921), 380.Google Scholar
  41. 45.
    Jacob M. Price, ‘Glasgow, the Tobacco Trade, and the Scottish Customs, 1707–1730: Some Commercial, Administrative and Political Implications of the Union’, SHR, 63 (1984), 1–36.Google Scholar
  42. 46.
    Paul Langford, The Excise Crisis (Oxford, 1975);Google Scholar
  43. and E.R. Turner, ‘The Excise Scheme of 1733’, EHR, 42 (1927), 34–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 47.
    Peter Clarke, ‘The “Mother Gin” controversy in the early eighteenth century’, TRHS, 5th series, 38 (1988), 63–84.Google Scholar
  45. See also Lee Davison, ‘Experiments in the Social Regulation of Industry. Gin Legislation, 1729–1751’, in Lee Davison et al. (eds), Stilling the Grumbling Hive. The Response to Social and Economic Problems in England, 1689–1750 (Stroud, 1992), pp. 25–48.Google Scholar
  46. 49.
    Michael W. McCahill, ‘Peers, Patronage, and the Industrial Revolution’, JBS, 16 (1976), 84–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 52.
    Patrick O’Brien, Trevor Griffiths and Philip Hunt, ‘Political components of the industrial revolution: Parliament and the English cotton textile industry, 1660–1774’, EcHR, 44 (1991), 395–423;Google Scholar
  48. N. Rothstein, ‘The calico campaign of 1719–21’, East London Papers, 7 (1964), 3–21; and Tim Keirn, ‘Parliament, Legislation and the Regulation of English Textile Industries, 1689–1714’, in Lee Davison et al (eds), Stilling the Grumbling Hive, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
  49. 53.
    R.G. Wilson, Gentlemen Merchants (Manchester, 1971), p. 167.Google Scholar
  50. 54.
    Richard Wilson, ‘Newspapers and Industry: The Export of Wool Controversy in the 1780s’, in Michael Harris and Alan Lee (eds), The Press in English Society from the Seventeenth to the Nineteenth Centuries (1986), pp. 87–98.Google Scholar
  51. 57.
    Patrick Woodland, ‘Extra-Parliamentary Political Organization in the making: Benjamin Heath and the Opposition to the 1763 Cider Excise’, PH, 4 (1985), 115–36. See also Patrick Woodland, ‘Political Atomization and Regional Interests in the 1761 Parliament: The Impact of the Cider Debates, 1763–1766’, ibid., 8 (1989), 63–89; and Patrick Woodland, ‘The House of Lords, the City of London and Political Controversy in the mid-1760s: the Opposition to the Cider Excise further considered’, ibid., 11 (1992), 57–87.Google Scholar
  52. 58.
    John Money, ‘Birmingham and the West Midlands, 1760–1793: Politics and Regional Identity in the English Provinces in the Later Eighteenth Century’, MH, 1 (1971), 2–4.Google Scholar
  53. 59.
    Eric Robinson, ‘Matthew Boulton and the Art of Parliamentary Lobbying’, HJ, 7 (1964), 209–29;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. and B.D. Bargar, ‘Matthew Boulton and the Birmingham Petition of 1775’, WMQ, 3rd series, 13 (1956), 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 61.
    J.M. Norris, ‘Samuel Garbett and the Early Development of Industrial Lobbying in Great Britain’, EcHR, 2nd series, 10 (1957–8), 450–60;Google Scholar
  56. Witt Bowden, ‘The Influence of the Manufacturers on some of the Early Policies of William Pitt’, AHR, 29 (1924), 655–74;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. and Witt Bowden, Industrial Society in England Towards the End of the Eighteenth Century (New York, 1925), pp. 169–81.Google Scholar
  58. 62.
    Robert John Auckland (ed.), The Journal and Correspondence of William, Lord Auckland (4 vols, 1862), i, 90.Google Scholar
  59. 64.
    Witt Bowden, ‘The English Manufacturers and the Commercial Treaty of 1786 with France’, AHR, 25 (1919–20), 18–35; and Witt Bowden, Industrial Society in England Towards the End of the Eighteenth Century, pp. 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 66.
    Paul Langford, ‘Property and “virtual Representation” in Eighteenth-Century England’, HJ, 31 (1988), 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 67.
    Albert Goodwin, ‘Wood’s Halfpence’, EHR, 51 (1936), 647–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 68.
    Francis G. James, ‘The Irish Lobby in the Early Eighteenth Century’, EHR, 81 (1966), 543–57; Michael Kammen, Empire and Interest, p. 83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 69.
    W.E. Minchinton (ed.), Politics and the Port of Bristol in the Eighteenth Century (Bristol, 1963), pp. xxiv, xxxii–xxxiii; Leon S. Marshall, The Development of Public Opinion in Manchester 1780–1820 (Syracuse, New York), pp. 185–6;Google Scholar
  64. and Witt Bowden, ‘The Influence of the Manufacturers on Some of the Early Policies of William Pitt’, AHR, 29 (1924), 655–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 70.
    Alison Gilbert Olson, ‘Parliament, Empire and Parliamentary Law, 1776’, in J.G.A. Pocock (ed.), Three British Revolutions (Princeton, 1980), pp. 289–322.Google Scholar
  66. 71.
    Michael Kammen, A Rope of Sand: The Colonial Agents, British Politics and the American Revolution (Ithaca, 1968);Google Scholar
  67. and P.D.G. Thomas, British Politics and the Stamp Act Crisis (Oxford, 1975), ch. 2.Google Scholar
  68. 74.
    James E. Bradley, Popular Politics and the American Revolution (Macon, Georgia, 1986);Google Scholar
  69. and John Sainsbury, Disaffected Patriots: London Supporters of Revolutionary America 1769–1782 (Gloucester, 1983).Google Scholar
  70. 76.
    Paul Langford, ‘Property and “Virtual Representation” in Eighteenth-Century England’, HJ, 31 (1988), 107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 77.
    J.R. Harris, ‘Early Liverpool Canal Controversies’, in J.R. Harris (ed.), Liverpool and Merseyside (1969), pp. 88–92.Google Scholar
  72. 78.
    R.C. Gwilliam, ‘The Chester Tanners and Parliament 1711–1717’, JCAS, 44 (1957), 41–9.Google Scholar
  73. 79.
    H.T. Dickinson, Radical Politics in the North-East of England in the Later Eighteenth Century (Durham, 1979), p. 8.Google Scholar
  74. 80.
    J. De L. Mann, ‘Clothiers and Weavers in Wiltshire during the Eighteenth Century’, in L.S. Pressnell (ed.), Studies in the Industrial Revolution (1960), pp. 66–96;Google Scholar
  75. M. Dorothy George, ‘The London Coal-Heavers: Attempts to Regulate Waterside Labour in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries’, EcH, 1 (1926–9), 229–48;Google Scholar
  76. C.R. Dobson, Masters and Journeymen (1980), pp. 88–9;Google Scholar
  77. Arthur G. Rose, ‘Early Cotton Riots in Lancashire, 1769–1779’, TLCAS, 73–4 (1963–4), 72–4;Google Scholar
  78. and A.F.J. Brown, ‘Colchester in the eighteenth century’ in Lionel M. Munby (ed.), East Anglian Studies (Cambridge, 1968), pp. 148–9.Google Scholar
  79. 81.
    J.M. Fewster, ‘The Keelmen of Tyneside in the Eighteenth Century’, DUJ, 50 (1957–8), 28–9, 120–1.Google Scholar
  80. 82.
    D.G.D. Isaac, ‘A Study of Popular Disturbances in Britain 1714–1754’, unpublished PhD thesis (Edinburgh University, 1953), pp. 92–103;Google Scholar
  81. and N. Rothstein, ‘The calico campaign of 1719–1721’, East London Papers, 7 (1964), 3–21.Google Scholar
  82. 83.
    Geoffrey Holmes, The Trial of Doctor Sacheverell (1973);Google Scholar
  83. Nicholas Rogers, ‘Popular Protest in Early Hanoverian London’, P&P, 79 (1978), 70–100;Google Scholar
  84. and G.V. Bennett, The Tory Crisis in Church and State 1688–1730 (Oxford, 1975), pp. 213–15.Google Scholar
  85. 84.
    Thomas W. Perry, Public Opinion, Propaganda and Politics in Eighteenth-Century England (Cambridge, Mass., 1962).Google Scholar
  86. 85.
    E.C. Black, The Association (Cambridge, Mass., 1963), pp. 131–73; T.C. Hansard, Parl Hist, xx (1814), 322–7; ibid., xxi (1814), 386, 533, 654–60, 702–3; and Northumberland County RO, Ridley (Blagden) MSS. ZRI 25/11. Letters to and from Jasper Harrison on the Newcastle petition.Google Scholar
  87. 86.
    N.C. Hunt, Two Early Political Associations (Oxford, 1961), chs 1–6.Google Scholar
  88. 87.
    G.M. Ditchfield, ‘Parliament, the Quakers and the Tithe question 1750–1835’, PH, 4 (1985), 87–114.Google Scholar
  89. 88.
    N.C. Hunt, Two Early Political Associations, chs 7–9; and J. Steven Watson, ‘Dissent and Toleration’, in Alex Natan, Silver Renaissance (1961), pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  90. 89.
    Russell E. Richey, ‘The Origins of British Radicalism: The Changing Rationale for Dissent’, ECS, 7 (1973–4), 179–92;Google Scholar
  91. and Richard Burgess Barlow, Citizenship and Conscience (Philadelphia, 1962), chs 5–6.Google Scholar
  92. 90.
    G.M. Ditchfield, ‘The parliamentary struggle over the repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, 1787–1790’, EHR, 89 (1970), 551–77;Google Scholar
  93. and Thomas W. Davis, Committees for Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts: Minutes 1786–90 and 1827–8 (London Record Society, 1978), pp. vii–xvii.Google Scholar
  94. 91.
    G.M. Ditchfield, ‘The campaign in Lancashire and Cheshire for the Repeal of the Test and Corporation Acts, 1787–1790’, THSLC, 126 (1977), 109–38.Google Scholar
  95. 92.
    T.C. Curtis and W.A. Speck, ‘The Societies for the Reformation of Manners: A Case Study in the Theory and Practice of Moral Reform’, LH, 3 (1976), 45–64;Google Scholar
  96. Tina Isaacs, ‘The Anglican Hierarchy and the Reformation of Manners 1688–1738’, JEH, 33 (1982), 391–411; Robert B. Shoemaker, ‘Reforming the City: The Reformation of Manners Campaign in London, 1690–1738’, in Lee Davison et al (eds), Stilling the Grumbling Hive, pp. 99–120; and Mary E. Fissell, ‘Charity Universal? Institutions and Moral Reform in Eighteenth-Century Bristol’, in ibid., pp. 121–44.Google Scholar
  97. 93.
    Joanna Innes, ‘Politics and Morals: the Reformation of Manners movement in later eighteenth-century England’, in Eckhart Hellmuth (ed.), The Transformation of Political Culture in Britain and Germany in the Later Eighteenth Century (Oxford, 1980), pp. 57–118.Google Scholar
  98. 94.
    J.R. Poynter, Society and Pauperism. English Ideas on Poor Relief, 1795–1834 (1969), pp. 91–8.Google Scholar
  99. 95.
    James E. Bradley, Popular Politics and the American Revolution in England (Macon, Georgia, 1986), passim;Google Scholar
  100. and John Sainsbury, Disaffected Patriots. London supporters of Revolutionary America (Gloucester, 1987), passim. Google Scholar
  101. 96.
    J.E. Cookson, The Friends of Peace. Anti-war liberalism in England, 1793–1815 (Cambridge, 1982), chs 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 97.
    This account of the campaign against the slave trade is based on Roger Anstey, The Atlantic Slave Trade and British Abolition 1760–1810 (1975);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. Seymour Drescher, Capitalism and Anti-Slavery: British Mobilisation in Comparative Perspective (1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. James Walvin, England, Slaves and Freedom, 1776–1838 (1986);CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. James Walvin (ed.), Slavery and British Society 1776–1846 (1982), especially the editor’s introduction, his essay on ‘The Propaganda of Anti-Slavery’ and Seymour Drescher’s essay on ‘Public Opinion and the Destruction of British Colonial Slavery’;Google Scholar
  106. James Walvin, ‘The Public Campaign in England against Slavery, 1787–1834’, in David Eltis and James Walvin (eds), The Abolition of the Atlantic Slave Trade (Madison, 1981), pp. 63–79;Google Scholar
  107. James Walvin, ‘Abolishing the Slave Trade: Anti-Slavery and Popular Radicalism, 1776–1807’, in Clive Emsley and James Walvin (eds), Artisans, Peasants and Proletarians 1760–1860 (1985), pp. 32–56;Google Scholar
  108. Peter Marshall, ‘The Anti-Slave Trade Movement in Bristol’, in Peter McGrath (ed.), Bristol in the Eighteenth Century (Newton Abbot, 1972), pp. 182–208;Google Scholar
  109. G.M. Ditchfield, ‘Repeal, Abolition and Reform: A Study in the Interaction of Reforming Movements in the Parliament of 1790–6’, in Christine Bolt and Seymour Drescher (eds), Anti-Slavery, Religion and Reform (Folkestone, 1980), pp. 101–18;Google Scholar
  110. J.R. Oldfield, ‘The London Committee and Mobilization of Public Opinion against the Slave Trade’, HJ, 35 (1992), 331–43;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. and E.M. Hunt, ‘North of England Agitation for the Abolition of the Slave Trade 1780–1800’, unpublished MA thesis (Manchester University, 1959).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© H. T. Dickinson 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • H. T. Dickinson
    • 1
  1. 1.University of EdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations