Skip to main content

Great Britain

  • Chapter

Abstract

Public order policing in Britain has rapidly developed as a key issue on the contemporary political agenda. In the process, a number of seemingly inviolable features of both the police as an institution and policing as a set of functional activities have been challenged. The popular image of the British police as avuncular figures endowed with common sense and guided by the doctrine of minimum force now appears less persuasive. In the 1980s, police tactics during industrial disputes, at political demonstrations and during the course of violent street disorders in certain inner city areas, have damaged this sanguine portrait. Armed with new powers, possessing new equipment and co-ordinated on a national basis to combat disorder, they appear unfamiliar and discomfiting: less a part of society, more apart from it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. R. Reiner, The Politics of the Police (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Joyce, Spending on Law and Order: The Police Service in England and Wales (London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.P. Miller and D.E. Luke, Law Enforcement by Public Officials and Special Police Forces (London: Home Office, 1977). This 4-volume study was declassified in 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. See S. Spencer, Called to Account (London: NCCL, 1985) and T. Jefferson and R. Grimshaw, Controlling the Constable (London: Muller, 1984). Both provide lucid accounts of the Act, especially in relation to the principle of tripartism.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sir William Fraser, Postwar Police Developments: Restrospect and Reflections, James Smart Lecture, Strathclyde Police Headquarters (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Card, ‘Police Accountability and Control Over the Police’, Bramshill Journal, 1 (1979) 12.

    Google Scholar 

  7. There are three levels of financial aid:’ small’, ‘large scale’ and ‘major’. See S. Spencer, Police Authorities During the Miners’ Strike (London: Cobden Trust, 1986) and B. Loveday, ‘Central Co-ordination, Police Authorities and the Miners’ Strike’, Political Quarterly, 57 (1986) 60–73.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kettle, ‘The National Reporting Centre and the 1984 Miners’ Strike’, in B. Fine and R. Millar (eds), Policing the Miners’ Strike (1985) p. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See R. Geary, Policing Industrial Disputes: 1893 to 1985 (1985) pp. 67–115.

    Google Scholar 

  10. C. Scorer, S. Spencer and P. Hewitt, The New Prevention of Terrorism Act (London: NCCL, 1985) p. 7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sir Robert Mark, The Metropolitan Police and Political Demonstrations, Bramshill, Police Staff College Lecture (17 March, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lord Scarman, The Scarman Report: The Brixton Disorders 10–12 April 1981 (1982) p. 153.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Metropolitan Police, Public Order Review: Civil Disturbances 1981–1985 (London: July 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  14. W. Belson, The Public and the Police (London: Harper & Row, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  15. NOP, Residents’ Views on Policing Needs and Priorities in Eight London Police Divisions: Summary Report (London: NOP, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Policy Studies Institute, Police and People in London (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  17. For a more detailed account of this process of politicisation see Reiner, The Politics of the Police, pp. 61–82; and M. Kettle, ‘The Politics of Policing and the Policing of Politics’, in P. Hain (ed.), Policing the Police (1980) pp. 9–62.

    Google Scholar 

  18. The Police Federation represents officers from the rank of Constable to Chief Inspector; the Police Superintendents’ Association represents Superintendents and Chief Superintendents; and the Association of Chief Police Officers all ranks above Chief Superintendent. None are conventional trades unions and the police are prohibited by the Police Act 1964 from taking strike action. See R. Reiner, The Blue-Coated Worker (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The relevant research is quoted in R. Reiner, ‘The Politicisation of the Police in Britain’, in M. Punch (ed.), Control in the Police Organisation (1983) p. 147.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 John D. Brewer, Adrian Guelke, Ian Hume, Edward Moxon-Browne and Rick Wilford

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brewer, J.D., Guelke, A., Hume, I., Moxon-Browne, E., Wilford, R. (1996). Great Britain. In: The Police, Public Order and the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24647-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics