Skip to main content

Prisons in Crisis: The American Experience

  • Chapter
Prisons 2000

Abstract

Over the past two decades, an increasingly lengthy roster of commentators has characterized prisons in the United States as being in ‘crisis’ (see, for example, Blumstein, 1989; Colvin, 1992; Cullen and Gilbert, 1982; Gottfredson and McConville, 1987; Selke, 1993; Sherman and Hawkins, 1981; Simon, 1993). The term has been invoked to describe virtually every aspect of the American correctional system, but two uses have been most prominent and will occupy our attention here.1 Most obvious and most often, commentators speak of the ‘crowding crisis’ — how escalating inmate populations tax system resources and create an unrelenting administrative nightmare. Less clearly articulated but perhaps more fundamental, there is a sense that the very purpose or ‘conscience’ (Rothman, 1980) of the correctional enterprise is up for grabs or, still worse, undergoing a disquieting transformation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andrews, D. A. (1982) The Level of Supervision Inventory (LSI): The First Follow-Up (Toronto: Ontario Ministry of Correctional Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. and Bonta, J. (1994) The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (Cincinnati: Anderson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A.; Bonta, J.; and Hoge, R. D. (1990) ‘Classification for Effective Rehabilitation: Rediscovering Psychology’, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17: 19–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A. and Kiessling, J. J. (1980) ‘Program Structure and Effective Correctional Practices: A Summary of the CAVIC Research’, in R. Ross and P. Gendreau (eds), Effective Correctional Treatment (Toronto: Buttersworth): 441–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A.; Zinger, Ivan; Hoge, R. D.; Bonta, J.; Gendreau, P.; and Cullen, F. T. (1990) ‘Does Correctional Treatment Work? A Clinically-Relevant and Psychologically-Informed Meta Analysis’, Criminology, 28: 369–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Associated Press (1994) ‘Prison Budget to Rise’, Cincinnati Post (November 21): F7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, C.; Heinz, R.; and Bemus, B. (1979) The Wisconsin Case Classification/ Staff Deployment Project, Project Report No. 14 (Madison, WI: Department of Health and Social Services, Division of Corrections).

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1982) ‘On the Racial Disproportionality of United States’ Prison Populations, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 73: 1259–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1989) ‘American Prisons in a Time of Crisis’, L. Goodstein and D. L. MacKenzie (eds), The American Prison: Issues in Research and Policy (New York: Plenum): 13–22.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. (1995) ‘Prisons’, in J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds), Crime (San Francisco: ICS Press): 387–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumstein, A. and Cohen, J. (1973) ‘A Theory of the Stability of Punishment’, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 64: 198–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics (1992) Drugs, Crime, and the Justice System: A National Report (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. M.; Lurigio, A. J.; and Petersilia, J. (eds) (1992) Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, J. M. and Pattavina, A. (1992) ‘The Effectiveness Issue: Assessing What Works in the Adult Community Corrections System’, in J. M. Byrne, A. J. Lurigio, and J. Petersilia (eds), Smart Sentencing: The Emergence of Intermediate Sanctions (Newbury Park, CA: Sage): 281–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camp, G. M. and Camp, C. G. (1994) The Corrections Yearbook 1994: Adult Corrections (South Salem, N.Y.: Criminal Justice Institute).

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. (1993) Crime Control as Industry: Towards GULAGS, Western Style? (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. R. (1994) Harm in American Penology: Offenders, Victims and Their Communities (Albany: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clear, T. R. and Braga, A. A. (1995) ‘Community Corrections’, in J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds), Crime (San Francisco: ICS Press): 421–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1983) ‘Incapacitation as a Strategy for Crime Control: Possibilities and Pitfalls’, in M. Tonry and N. Morris (eds), Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol. 5 (Chicago, University of Chicago Press): 1–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. and Canelo-Cacho, J. A. (1994) ‘Incarceration and Violent Crime: 1965–1988’, in A. J. Reiss, Jr. and J. A. Roth (eds), Understanding and Preventing Violence: Consequences and Control, vol. 4 (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Colvin, M. (1992) The Penitentiary in Crisis: From Accommodation to Riot in New Mexico (Albany: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. and Gendreau, P. (1989) ‘The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: Reconsidering the “Nothing Works” Debate’, in L. Goodstein and D. L. MacKenzie (eds), The American Prison: Issues in Research and Policy (New York: Plenum): 23–44.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. and Gilbert, K. E. (1982) Reaffirming Rehabilitation (Cincinnati: Anderson).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T.; Latessa, E. J.; Burton, V. S., Jr.; and Lombardo, L. X. (1993) ‘The Correctional Orientation of Prison Wardens: Is the Rehabilitative Ideal Supported?’ Criminology, 31: 69–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T.; Lutze, F. E.; Link, B. G.; and Wolfe, N. T. (1989) ‘The Correctional Orientation of Prison Guards: Do Officers Support Rehabilitation?’ Federal Probation, 53: 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T.; Skovron, S. E.; Scott, J. E.; and Burton, V. S., Jr. (1990) ‘Public Support for Correctional Rehabilitation: The Tenacity of the Rehabilitative Ideal’, Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 17 (1990) 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T. and Wright, J. P. (in press) ‘The Future of Corrections’, in B. Maguire and P. Radosh (eds), The Past, Present, and Future of American Criminal Justice (New York: General Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cullen, F. T.; Wright, J. P.; and Applegate, B. K. (in press) ‘Control in the Community: The Limits of Reform?’ in A. T. Harland (ed.), Choosing Correctional Interventions that Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1985) Confronting Crime: An American Challenge (New York: Pantheon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Currie, E. (1993) Reckoning: Drugs, the Cities, and the American Future (New York: Hill and Wang).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1987) Governing Prisons: A Comparative Study of Correctional Management (New York: The Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1991) No Escape: The Future of American Corrections (New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1994a) ‘Instant Replay: Three Strikes Was the Right Call’, American Prospect, 18 (Summer): 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1994b) ‘The Question of Black Crime’, Public Interest, 117 (Fall): 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1994c) ‘A Philadelphia Crime Story’, Wall Street Journal (October 26): A21).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilulio, J. J., Jr. and Piehl, A. M. (1991) ‘Does Prison Pay? The Stormy National Debate Over the Cost-Effectiveness of Imprisonment’, Brookings Review, 9 (Fall): 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P. and Langan, P. A. (1992) ‘Changes in Crime and Punishment in England and America in the 1980s’, Justice Quarterly, 9: 5–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. M. and Simon, J. (1992) ‘The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications’, Criminology, 30: 449–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeley, M. M. and Simon, J. (1994) ‘Actuarial Justice: The Emerging New Criminal Law’, in D. Nelken (ed.), The Futures of Criminology (London: Sage): 173–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forer, L. G. (1994) A Rage to Punish: The Unintended Consequences of Mandatory Sentencing (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, B. (1995) ‘Prosecution and Sentencing’, in J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds), Crime (San Francisco: ICS Press): 363–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, C. J. (1985) ‘Effects of Residential Treatment on Adjudicated Delinquents’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 22: 287–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. (1994) ‘Community Corrections in the US: A Decade of Punishing Stupidly’, presentation to the annual meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences (March), Chicago, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. (in press) ‘The Principles of Effective Intervention with Offenders’, in A. T. Harland (ed.), Choosing Correctional Interventions That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P.; Cullen, F. T.; and Bonta, J. (1994) ‘Intensive Rehabilitation Supervision: The Next Generation in Community Corrections?’, Federal Probation, 58 (No. 1): 72–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. and Little, T. (1993) ‘A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Sanctions on Offender Recidivism’, unpublished manuscript, Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick-Saint John.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendreau, P. and Ross, R. R. (1987) ‘Revivification of Rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980s’, Justice Quartely, 4: 349–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldkamp, J. S. and Jones, P. R. (1992) ‘Pretrial Drug-Testing Experiments in Milwaukee and Prince Georges County: The Context of Implementation’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 29: 430–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. R. (1991) The Justice Juggernaut: Fighting Street Crime, Controlling Citizens (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. R. (1994) The Return of the Dangerous Classes: Drug Prohibition and Policy Politics (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. M.; Kelley, B.; and Lane, L. (1963) Association Analysis in a Prison Sample and Prediction of Parole Performance (Vacaville, CA: Institute for the Study of Crime and Delinquency).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, D. M.; Wilkins, L.; and Hoffman, P. (1978) Guidelines for Parole and Sentencing: A Policy Control Model (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D. (1995) ‘Fighting Crime at the Expense of College’, Chronicle of Higher Education (20 January): B1–B2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, S. D. and McConville, S. (eds) (1987) America’s Correctional Crisis: Prison Populations and Public Policy (New York: Greenwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramm, P. (1993) ‘Drugs, Crime and Punishment: Don’t Let Judges Set Crooks Free’, New York Times (8 July): A19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, P. W. (1994) ‘Estimating the Effects of Three Strikes and You’re Out Sentencing Laws on Crime Rates and Costs’, presentation to the annual meeting of the American Society of Criminology (November), Miami, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grieser, R. C. (1988) Wardens and State Corrections Commissioners Offer Their Views in National Assessment (Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Griset, P. L. (1991) Determinate Sentencing: The Promise and the Reality of Retributive Justice (Albany: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Guynes, R. (1988) Nation’s Jail Managers Assess Their Problems (Washington, D.C., National Institute of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hacker, A. (1992) Two Nation’s: Black and White, Separate, Hostile, and Unequal (New York: Charles Scribners Sons).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. (1994) Crime and Disrepute (Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Force).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, O.; Hunt, D.; and Schroder, H. (1961) Conceptual Systems and Personality Organisation (New York: John Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R. J. and Murray, C. (1994) The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. (1980) Prisons in Turmoil (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Irwin, J. and Austin, J. (1994) It’s About Time: America’s Prison Binge (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. B. (1977) Stateville: The Penitentiary in Mass Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jesness, C.F. and Wedge, R. (1983) Classifying Offenders: The Jesness Inventory Classification System (Sacramento: California Youth Authority).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. (1994) ‘To Rehabilitate of Punish: Results of a Public Opinion Poll’, American Jails, 8 (November–December): 41–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. (1987) Hard Time: Understanding and Reforming the Prison (Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R. (in press) ‘Risk Prediction in Criminal Justice’, in A. T. Harland (ed), Choosing Correctional Interventions That Work: Defining the Demand and Evaluating the Supply (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. R. and Goldkamp, J. S. (1993) ‘Implementing Pretrial Drug-Testing Programs in Two Experimental Sites: Some Deterrence and Jail Bed Implications’, Prison Journal 73: 199–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kane, T. and Saylor, W. (1983) Security Designation/Custody Classification of Inmates (unpublished manuscript, Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L.; Colby, A.; Gibbs, J.; Speicher-Dubin, B.; and Candee, D. (1978) Standard Scoring Manual (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A. (1991) ‘America’s Soaring Prison Population’, Science, 251: 1568–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langan, P. A. (1994) ‘No Racism in the Justice System’, Public Interest, 117 (Fall): 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilly, J. R. (1992) ‘Selling Justice: Electronic Monitoring and the Security Industry’, Justice Quarterly, 9: 493–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W. (1992) ‘Juvenile Delinquency Treatment: A Meta-Analytic Inquiry into the Variability of Effects’, in T. D. Cook, H. Cooper, D. S. Cordray, H. Hartmann, L. V. Hedges, R. J. Light, T. A. Louis, and F. Mosteller (eds), Meta-Analysis for Explanation (New York: Russell Sage Foundation): 83–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, C. H. and DiIulio, J. J., Jr. (1992) ‘Ten Myths About Crime and Prisons’, Wisconsin Interest, 1: 21–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, J. (1995) ‘Crime in International Perspective’, in J. Q. Wilson and J. Petersilia (eds), Crime (San Francisco: ICS Press): 11–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B. (ed.) (1987) Intermediate Punishments: Intensive Supervision, Home Confinement and Electronic Confinement (Monsey, N.Y.: Willow Tree Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McCorkle, R. C. (1993) ‘Punish and Rehabilitate? Public Attitudes Toward Six Common Crimes’, Crime and Delinquency, 39: 240–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, K. and Pastore, A. L. (eds), Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics-1993 (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauer, M. (1994) Americans Behind Bars: The International Use of Incarceration, 1992–1993 (Washington, D.C.: Sentencing Project).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, R. (1974) ‘What Works? — Questions and Answers About Prison Reform’, Public Interest, 35 (Spring): 22–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Megargee, E. I. and Bohn, M. J., Jr. (1979) Classifying Criminal Offenders: A New System Based on the MMPI (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1991) Last One Over the Wall: The Massachusetts Experiment in Closing Reform Schools (Columbus: Ohio State University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, N. and Tonry, M. (1990) Between Prison and Probation: Intermediate Punishments in a Rational Sentencing System (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections (1982) Classification: Principles, Models, and Guidelines (Washington, D.C.: US Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Corrections (ed.) (1985) ‘Our Crowded Prisons’, Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 478: 9–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • New York University Review of Law and Social Change (1983–1984) ‘Colloquium: The Prison Crowding Crisis’, 12: 1–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Criminal Justice Services (1995) The State of Crime and Criminal Justice in Ohio (Columbus: Office of Criminal Justice Services).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1975) ‘Martinson Revisited’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 12: 133–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1978) Corrections Intervention and Research: Current Issues and Future Prospects (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, T. (1992) The Re-Emergence of Correctional Intervention (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1992) ‘California’s Prison Policy: Causes, Costs, and Consequences’, Prison Journal, 72: 8–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. and Turner, S. (1993) ‘Intensive Probation and Parole’, in M. Tonry (ed.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 17 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press): 281–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. and Turner, S., with the assistance of Peterson, J. (1986) Prison versus Probation in California: Implications for Crime and Offender Recidivism (Santa Monica, CA: RAND).

    Google Scholar 

  • Platt, A. M. (1969) The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay, H. C. (1983) Technical Manual for the Behavioral Classifications System for Adult Offenders (Washington, D.C.: Department of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reitsma-Street, M. (1984) ‘Differential Treatment of Young Offenders: A Review of the Conceptual Level Matching Model’, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 26: 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivara, F. P. and Farrington, D. P. (in press) ‘Prevention of Violence: Role of the Pediatrician’, Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothman, D. J. (1980) Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America (Boston: Little, Brown).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman, E. (1990) Beyond Punishment: A New View on the Rehabilitation of Criminal Offenders (New York: Greenwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaner, S. (1994) ‘Percent of Prison Population Violent Offenders and Budget Expenditures’ (Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, personal communication).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scull, A. (1977) Decarceration: Community Treatment and the Deviant — A Radical View (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selke, W. L. (1993) Prisons in Crisis (Bloomington: Indiana University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, M. and Hawkins, G. (1981) Imprisonment in America: Choosing the Future (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, J. (1993) Poor Discipline: Parole and the Social Control of the Underclass, 1890–1990 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolnick, J. H. (1994) ‘Wild Pitch: “Three Strikes, You’re Out” and Other Bad Calls on Crime’, American Prospect, 18 (Spring): 30–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, D. R. and Ragona, A. J. (1987) ‘Popular Moderation Versus Governmental Authoritarianism: An Interactionist View of Public Sentiments Toward Criminal Sanctions’, Crime and Delinquency, 33: 337–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (1994) ‘Racial Disproportion in US Prisons’, British Journal of Criminology, 34: 97–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonry, M. (1995) Malign Neglect: Race, Crime, and Punishment in America (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1987) ‘Correctional Effectiveness: The High Cost of Ignoring Success’, Federal Probation, 51 (no. 1): 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1992) ‘An Overview of Offender Classification Systems’, in D. Lester, M. Braswell and P. Van Voorhis (eds), Correctional Counseling, 2nd edn (Cincinnati: Anderson): 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1994a) Psychological Classification of the Adult, Male Prison Inmate (Albany, N.Y.: SUNY Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Voorhis, P. (1994b) ‘A Multiple Indicators Approach to Understanding Prison Adjustment’, Justice Quarterly, 11: 679–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. A. (1986) ‘The Rand Inmate Survey: A Reanalysis’, in A. Blumstein, J. Cohen, J. A. Roth and C. A. Visher, Criminal Careers and ‘Career Criminals’, vol. 2 (Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press): 161–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visher, C. A. (1987) ‘Incapacitation and Crime Control: Does a “Lock ’Em Up” Strategy Reduce Crime?’ Justice Quartely, 4: 513–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. (1983) ‘Applications of Interpersonal Maturity Theory to Offender Populations’, in W. S. Laufer and J. M. Day (eds), Personality Theory, Moral Development, and Criminal Behavior (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books): 23–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, M. and the Staff of the Community Treatment Project (1966) Interpersonal Maturity Level Classification: Diagnosis and Treatment of Low, Middle, and High Maturity Delinquents (Sacramento, CA: California Youth Authority).

    Google Scholar 

  • Welch, R. (1990) ‘Private Prisons — Profitable and Growing’, Corrections Compendium, 15 (April): 1, 5–8, 16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, J. T. and Lab, S. P. (1989) ‘A Meta-Analysis of Juvenile Correctional Treatment’, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 26: 276–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, T. (1991) ‘The Punitive Society’, New York Times (12 January).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. Q. (1975) Thinking About Crime (New York: Random House).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, J. P. (1995) ‘Not Liberals’ Fault’, Johnson City Press (27 January): A4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. N. (1994) Effective Prison Leadership (Binghamton, N.Y.: William Neil).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, K. N.; Clear, T. R.; and Dickson, P. (1984) ‘Universal Application of Probation Risk-Assessment Instruments: A Critique’, Criminology, 22: 113–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, R. A. (1994) In Defense of Prisons (Westport, CT: Greenwood).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawitz, M. W. (ed.) (1988) Report to the Nation on Crime and Justice, 2nd edn (Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedlewski, E. W. (1987) Research in Brief: Making Confinement Decisions (Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1988) ‘The New Mathematics of Imprisonment’, Crime and Delinquency, 34: 425–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1991) The Scale of Imprisonment (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1994) ‘The Growth of Imprisonment in California’, British Journal of Criminology, 34: 83–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimring, F. and Hawkins, G. (1995) Incapacitation: Penal Confinement and the Restraint of Crime (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Roger Matthews and Peter Francis

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cullen, F.T., Van Voorhis, P., Sundt, J.L. (1996). Prisons in Crisis: The American Experience. In: Matthews, R., Francis, P. (eds) Prisons 2000. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24559-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics