Advertisement

Can we Research the Private Sphere?

Methodological and Ethical Problems in the Study of the Role of Intimate Emotion in Personal Relationships
  • Jean Duncombe
  • Dennis Marsden
Part of the Explorations in Sociology book series (EIS)

Abstract

In the classic discussion from which this conference took its title, C. Wright Mills (1959) argued that the sociological imagination works on the distinction between ‘the personal troubles of milieu’ and ‘the public issues of social structure’, giving as one of his examples marriage. Our paper takes up this theme, describing some of the sociological, methodological, philosophical and ethical problems raised by research including our own (Duncombe and Marsden, 1993a, 1993b, 1995a, 1995b) on intimate couple relationships. Our research is in line with the recent theoretical shifts which have focused attention on the nature of interpersonal relationships in contemporary society and have emphasised the need for a greater understanding of the interconnections between the ‘public’ and the ‘private’ spheres of social life. There is a new urgency in attempting to research intimate personal experience, in order to resuscitate and re-theorise areas such as changing family bonds and other newer forms of close relationships (Morgan, 1985, 1990; Clark and Haldane, 1990) but also as an essential contribution to broader theories of society (Cheal, 1991; Giddens, 1991, 1992).

Keywords

Ethical Problem Gender Relation Couple Relationship Private Sphere Feminist Research 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allan, G. (1980), ‘A Note on Interviewing Spouses Together’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, February, vol. 42, pp. 205–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkinson, P. (1990), The Ethnographic Imagination: Textual Constructions of Reality (London: Routledge).Google Scholar
  3. Banks, J. (1959), ‘Research Note on the Use of Group Discussions in Research’, Sociological Review, vol. 7.Google Scholar
  4. Berger, P. L. and Kellner, H. (1970), ‘Marriage and the Construction of Reality’, in Dreitzl, H. (ed.), Recent SociologyNo. 2 (New York: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  5. Bernard, J. (1972), The Future of Marriage (New York: World Publishing).Google Scholar
  6. Bott, E. (1957), Family and Social Network (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  7. Brannen, J. (1988), ‘Research Note: The Study of Sensitive Subjects’, Sociological Review, vol. 36, pp. 552–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brannen, J. and Collard, J. (1982), Marriages in Trouble: The Process of Seeking Help (London: Tavistock).Google Scholar
  9. Brannen, J. and Moss, P. (1991), Managing Mothers (London: Unw in Hyman).Google Scholar
  10. Brannen, J. and Wilson, P. (1987), Give and Take in Families: Studies in Resource Distribution (London: Allen & Unwin).Google Scholar
  11. Burgoyne, J. and Clark, D. (1984), Making a Go of It: The Study of Stepfamilies (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  12. Cheal, D. (1991), Family and the State of Theory (London: Harvester Wheatsheaf).Google Scholar
  13. Clark, D. and Haldane, D. (1990), Wedlocked? Intervention and Research in Marriage (Oxford: Polity).Google Scholar
  14. Cohen, S. and Taylor, L. (1992), Escape Attempts, 2nd edn (London: Rouledge).Google Scholar
  15. Coward, R. (1992), Our Treacherous Hearts: Why Women Let Men Get Their Way (London: Faber).Google Scholar
  16. Dennis, N. and Erdos, G. (1992), Families without Fatherhood (London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit).Google Scholar
  17. Denzin, N. K. (1989), Interpretive Interactionism (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  18. Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1993a), ‘“Workaholics” and “Whingeing Women”: Gender Inequalities in the Performance of Emotion Work in the Private Sphere’, Conference Proceedings of the 1992 Cambridge Stratification Seminar: Inequalities in Employment: Inequalities in Home Life (Cambridge: Sociological Research Group).Google Scholar
  19. Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1993b), ‘Love and Intimacy: The Gender Division of Emotion and Emotion Work (A Neglected Aspect of Sociological Discussion of Heterosexual Relationships)’, Sociology, vol. 27: no. 2, May 1993, pp. 221–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1995a), ‘Theorising Intimacy: the Last Frontier of Gender Inequality’, Sociological Review vol. 43 (in press).Google Scholar
  21. Duncombe, J. and Marsden, D. (1995b), ‘Can Men Love? “Reading”, “Staging” and “Resisting” the Romance’, in Pearce, L. and Stacey, J. (eds), Romance Revisited (London: Lawrence & (Wishart).Google Scholar
  22. Giddens, A. (1991), Late Modernity and Self-Identity (Polity Press).Google Scholar
  23. Giddens, A. (1992), The Transformation of Intimacy: Love, Sexuality and Eroticism in Modern Societies (Oxford: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  24. Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (1990), What is Family? (London: Mayfield).Google Scholar
  25. Hochschild, A. R. (1983), The Managed Heart: Commercialisation of Human Feeling (London: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  26. Hochschild, A. R. with Maching, A. (1990), The Second Shift: Working Parents and the Revolution at Home (London: Piarkus).Google Scholar
  27. Ingham, M. (1984), Men (London: Century).Google Scholar
  28. Kelly, L. (1992), ‘Journeying in Reverse: Possibilities and Problems in Feminist Research on Sexual Violence’, in Morris, A. (ed.), Feminist Perspectives in Criminology (Milton Keynes: Open University Press).Google Scholar
  29. Laslett, B. and Rapoport, R. (1975), ‘Collaborative Interviewing and Interactive Research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 37, pp. 968–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Larossa, R., Bennett, L. A. and Gelles, R. J. (1981), ‘Ethical Dilemmas in Qualitative Family Research’, Journal of Marriage and the Family, vol. 43.Google Scholar
  31. Mansfield, P. and Collard, J. (1988), The Beginning of the Rest of Your Life? (London: Macmillan).Google Scholar
  32. McKee, L. and O’Brien, M. (1983), ‘Interviewing Men: Taking Gender Seriously’, in Garmarnikow, E. et al. (eds), The Public and the Private (London: Heinemann).Google Scholar
  33. Morgan, D. H. J. (1985), The Family, Politics and Social Theory (London: Routledge and Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  34. Morgan, D. H. J. (1990), ‘Institution and Relationship within Marriage’, paper presented to the I. S.A. World Congress in Madrid.Google Scholar
  35. Morgan, D. (1990), Focus Groups (London: Sage).Google Scholar
  36. Morris, L. D. (1990), The Workings of the Household (Oxford: Polity Press).Google Scholar
  37. Murray, C. (1990), The Emerging British Underclass (London: IEA Health and Welfare Unit).Google Scholar
  38. Oakley, A. (1981), ‘Interviewing Women: a Contradiction in Terms’, in Roberts, H. (ed.), Doing Feminist Research (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul).Google Scholar
  39. Pahl, J. (1989), Money and Marriage (London: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rubin, L. B. (1991), Erotic Wars: What Happened to the Sexual Revolution (New York: Harper Row).Google Scholar
  41. Skolnick, A. (1983), The Intimate Environment (Boston, MA: Little, Brown).Google Scholar
  42. Stacey, J. (1990), Brave New Families (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  43. Stanley, L. and Morgan,. D. H. J. (1993), ‘Editorial Introduction’, Sociology, vol. 27, no. 1, February, pp. 2–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vaughan, D. (1987), Uncoupling (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
  45. Voysey, M. (1975), A Constant Burden: The Reconstitution of Family Life (London: RKP).Google Scholar
  46. Weiss, R. (1975), Marital Separation (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  47. Wise, S. (1987), ‘A Framework for Discussing Ethical Issues in Feminist Research: a Review of the Literature’, in Giffiths, V. et al. (eds), Writing Feminist Biography 2: Using Life Histdries, Studies in Sexual Politics, Monograph, Manchester University Sociology Department.Google Scholar
  48. Wright Mills, C. (1959), The Sociological Imagination (Oxford: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  49. Young, M. and Willmott, P. (1973), The Symmetrical Family (Harmondsworth: Penguin).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© British Sociological Association 1996

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Duncombe
  • Dennis Marsden

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations