Skip to main content

Gay Brains, Gay Genes and Feminist Science Theory

  • Chapter
Sexual Cultures

Part of the book series: Explorations in Sociology ((EIS))

Abstract

Foucault’s argument in The History of Sexuality (1978) that until Westphal’s (1870) article on ‘contrary sexual sensations’, ‘The sodomite had been a temporary aberration: the homosexual was now a species’ has been hailed by many as the defining social constructionist account of sexuality in general and homosexuality in particular. While most contemporary sociologists would flinch at the fixity of the metaphor of ‘species’, for many discussing sexualities in a social context Michel Foucault hovers above as a gay intellectual father; others will be also conscious of Mary McIntosh (1968) as an intellectual mother who made rather earlier social constructionist claims. It was eight years before the French version of The History that McIntosh wrote her groundbreaking analysis of ‘The Homosexual Role’, in which she directed attention to the historical emergence of the (usually male) homosexual whose social role defines acceptable and unacceptable sexual behaviours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Allen, L. (1994) ‘Anatomical and Physiological Correlates of Sexual Orientation’, NOGLSTP Symposium, AAAS Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, J. M. and Pillard, R. C. (1991) ‘A Genetic Study of Male Sexual Orientation’, Archives of General Psychiatry, 48: pp. 1089–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, M. (1993) ‘Genetic Linkage and Male Homosexual Orientation: Reasons to be Cautious’, British Medical Journal, 307 (7): pp. 337–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrettand, M. and McIntosh, M. (1980) ‘The Family Wage: Some Problems for Socialists and Feminists’, Capital and Class, 11: pp. 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, M. (1990) Women’s Oppression Today: The Marxist Feminist Encounter ( London: Verso).

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, T. (1991) ‘Biology and Social Science: Why the Return of the Repressed should be given a Cautious Welcome’, Sociology, 25 (1): pp. 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delphy, C. (1977) The Main Enemy ( London: Women’s Research and Resources Centre Publications: Explorations in Feminism, no. 3 ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto Sterling, A. (1992) Myths of Gender ( New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausto Sterling, A. and Balaban, E. (1993) ‘Genetics and Male Sexual Orientation’, Science, 261: 1257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flugel, J. C. (1953) A Hundred Years of Psychology ( London: Duckworth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978) The History of Sexuality, vol. 1 ( New York: Pantheon ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuss, D. (1989) Essentially Speaking ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D., Hu, S., Magnuson, V. L., Hu, N. and Pattatucci, A. (1993) ‘A Linkage Between DNA Markers on the X Chromosone and Male Sexual Orientation’, Science, 261: pp. 421–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamer, D. and Copeland, P. (1994) The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behaviour (New York: Simon & Schuster).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. (1991) Simians, Cyborgs and Women ( London: Free Association Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (1986) The Science Question in Feminism ( Milton/Keynes: Open University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heamshaw, L. (1979) Cyril Burt: Psychologist (London: Hodder & Stoughton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, R. and Wald, E. (1993) Exploding the Gene Myth ( Boston, MA: Beacon).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy, S. (1981) The Woman that Never Evolved ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1994) ‘Sexual Innocents and Serendipity’, New Scientist, 12 (November): pp. 45–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L. (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ ( Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1985) Reflections on Gender and Science ( New Haven, CT: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, E. F. (1992) ‘Nature, Nurture and the Human Genome Project’, in D. Kevles, and L. Hood (eds), The Code of Codes, Scientific and Social Issues in the Human Genome Project ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, H. (1980) ‘The “Third Sex” Theory of Karl Heinrich Ulrichs’, Journal of Homosexuality, 6: pp. 103–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koshland, D. (1989) ‘Editorial’, Science, 246: p. 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S. (1991) ‘A Difference in Hypothalmic Structure between Heterosexual and Homosexual Men’, Science, 253: pp. 1034–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeVay, S. (1993) The Gay Brain ( Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, M. (1968) ‘The Homosexual Role’, Social Problems, 16 (2): pp. 182–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, R. (1994) ‘The Sociological Construction of Science without Nature’, Sociology, 28 (4): pp. 957–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. (1987) Selling Science ( New York: Freeman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, D. and Tancredi, L. (1989) Dangerous Diagnostics: The Social Power of Biological Information ( New York: Basic Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • NOGLSTP (1994) Press release, AAAS, 12 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oudshorn, N. (1990) ‘On the Making of Sex Hormones’, Social Studies of Science, 20: pp. 5–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayers, J. (1982) Biological Politics ( London: Tavistock).

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaab, D. and Hofman, M. A. (1990) ‘An Enlarged Suprachiasmatic Nucleus in Homosexual Men’, Brain Research, 537: p. 141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risch, N., Squires, C., Wheeler, E. and Keats, B. (1993) ‘Male Sexual Orientation and Genetic Evidence,’ Science, 262: pp. 2063–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. and Rose, S. (1980) ‘Against Reductionism’, in S. Rose (ed.), Against Biological Determinism ( London: Allison & Busby ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, H. (1994) Love Power and Knowledge: Towards a Feminist Transformation of the Sciences ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, S., Lewontin, R. and Kamin, L. (1984) Not in Our Genes ( Harmondsworth: Penguin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, B. S. (1984) The Body and Society: Explorations in Social Theory ( Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1986) Patriarchy at Work ( Cambridge: Polity Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Walby, S. (1990) Theorizing Patriarchy ( Oxford: Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1977) Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the Nineteenth Century to the Present ( London: Quartet).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, J. (1981) Sex Politics and Society: The Regulation of Sexuality since 1800 ( London: Longman ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weindling, P. (1989) Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism 1870–1845 ( Cambridge: Cambridge University Press ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975) Sociobiology: The New Synthesis ( Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 British Sociological Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, H. (1996). Gay Brains, Gay Genes and Feminist Science Theory. In: Weeks, J., Holland, J. (eds) Sexual Cultures. Explorations in Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24518-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics