Skip to main content

Can We Define the Voluntary Sector?

  • Chapter
Voluntary Agencies

Abstract

This paper examines the lack of clarity associated with the concept of the ‘voluntary sector’ and the repercussions resulting from the sector’s internal heterogeneity. It has been customary to view the voluntary sector as that which is not for profit (private) and not statutory (public). This residual view is, however, unsatisfactory, because it never says what the sector is, as against what it is not. In this chapter it is argued that the voluntary sector cannot be seen just in terms of service provision, but includes distinct (sub)sectors such as informal care, self-help and community activity, and action that has a religious motivation (‘missionary’) as well as organised voluntary service. Voluntary action can in fact move across sectors and much of the purpose of such action is to generate change in other sectors, although it also serves to preserve as well as change. The common element to all voluntary organisations is that they serve as mediators between the individual and the state, both holding society together and lubricating it for social change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Berger, P. and R. Neuhaus (1977) To Empower People: The Role of Mediating Structures in Public Policy, American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (1989) A Theory of the Voluntary Sector: Implications for Policy and Practice, Working Paper no. 5, Centre for Voluntary Organisation, London School of Economics, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, P.M. and W.R. Scott (1963) Formal Organizations, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenton, M. (1985) The Voluntary Sector in British Social Services, Longman, London and New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulmer, M. (1986) Neighbours: The Work of Philip Abrams, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvill, G. and B. Munday (eds) (1984) Volunteers in the Personal Social Services, Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Tocqueville, A. (1956) Democracy in America, Mentor, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, J. (1983) Why Charity? The Case for a Third Sector, Sage, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gladstone, F. (1979) Voluntary Action in a Changing World, Bedford Square Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hadley, R. and S. Hatch (1981) Social Welfare and the Failure of the State, Allen & Unwin, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansmann, H.B. (1980) ‘The role of nonprofit enterprise’, Yale Law Journal, 89: 835–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, S. (1993) ‘Where the work of charity stops’, Third Sector, 9 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, S. and T. Hinton (1986) Self-Help in Practice: A Study of Contact a Family, Community Work and Family Support, Joint Unit for Social Services Research, Sheffield University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight, B. (1993) Voluntary Action, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (1965) ‘Ideology, status and power in board-executive relationships’, Social Work, 10, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (1981) Voluntary Agencies in the Welfare State, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynn, P. and J. Davis Smith The 1991 National Survey of Voluntary Activity in the UK, Volunteer Centre UK, Berkhamsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, T. (1994) The Assessment of Local Voluntary Activity: Developing the Method, Home Office, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, M. (1987) ‘Nonprofit boards of directors: beyond the governance function’ in The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, ed. W.W. Powell, Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. (1993a) Understanding Voluntary Organizations in Contemporary Western Society, Aston Business School, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, S. (1993b) Toward a Theory of the Voluntary Sector? A Review of Theories of Voluntary Action, Aston Business School, Birmingham.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, A. and M. Goodman (1983) Self-Help and Social Care: Mutual Aid Organisations in Practice, Policy Studies Institute, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolpert, J. (1993) ‘Decentralization and equity in public and nonprofit sectors’, Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 22(4): 281–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1996 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marshall, T.F. (1996). Can We Define the Voluntary Sector?. In: Billis, D., Harris, M. (eds) Voluntary Agencies. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24485-0_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics