Skip to main content

Institutional Investment — Theory and Practice

  • Chapter
Current Issues in Financial Services
  • 24 Accesses

Abstract

One of the major changes in the UK capital market over the last quarter of a century and more has been the extent to which institutional investors have replaced individuals as the most important holders of ordinary shares. During the 1980s the Conservative government under Margaret Thatcher encouraged individual share ownership through the privatisation of nationalised industries. But although the number of adults owning ordinary shares increased from 3 million in 1979 to around 11 million in 1990, their relative importance in the stock market continued to decline. There was ‘widening’ rather than ‘deepening’ of share ownership — the number of personal shareholders rose, but their percentage of the total market continued to fall. In fact, a survey by London Stock Exchange in 1990 showed that 60% of personal shareholders held shares in only one company, and only 14% held shares in four or more companies. Between 1963 and 1992 the proportion of ordinary shares in UK listed companies held directly by individuals fell by two thirds — from almost 60% to under 20%. At the same time, the proportion held by the major institutional investors more than doubled — from 28% to 60% (see Table 7.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further reading

  • Dodds, J.C., The Investment Behaviour of British Life Assurance Companies (Croom-Helm, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fogler, R.H., ‘20% in Real Estate: Can Theory Justify It’?, Journal of Portfolio Management (Winter 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost, A.J. and Hager, D.P., A General Introduction to Institutional Investment (Heinemann, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Haugen, R.A., Modern Investment Theory, 3rd edn (Prentice-Hall, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • HMSO, Report of the Committee to Review the Functioning of Financial Institutions (Wilson Report), CMND 7937 (HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorie, J.H. and Hamilton, M.T., The Stock Market: Theories and Evidence (Irwin, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  • Markowitz, H.M., ‘Portfolio Selection’, Journal of Finance (December 1952).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehra, R. and Prescott, E., ‘The Equity Premium: A Puzzle’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 15 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Barr, W.M. and Conley, J.M., ‘Managing Relationships: The Culture of Institutional Investing’, Financial Analysts Journal (September—October 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pawley, M., Winstone, D. and Bentley, P., UK Financial Institutions and Markets (Macmillan, 1991).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F., ‘Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk’, Journal of Finance (September 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J.J., ‘The Equity Premium: Stock and Bond Returns’, Financial Analysts Journal (January—February 1992). [Reprinted in Lofthouse, S. (ed) ‘Readings in Investments’ (Wiley 1994) Chapter 17]

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.K., Proffitt, D.L. and Stephens, A.A., Investments (West Publishing, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • The BZW Equity—Gilt Study, 38th edn (Barclays de Zoete Wedd Research, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Winfield, R.G. and Curry, S.J., Success in Investment, 5th edn (John Murray, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Stephen Curry

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Curry, S. (1995). Institutional Investment — Theory and Practice. In: Anderton, B. (eds) Current Issues in Financial Services. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24462-1_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics