Abstract
What do the following have in common: a surplice, a maypole, a depiction of God the Father, a churchyard cross, bowing at the name of Jesus, and the man’s words to the woman in the marriage service? The question would have been no parlour game to the men and women who are the topic of this chapter. It could almost have formed part of one of the coundess catechisms and books of spiritual edification that were daily meat and drink to the godly — those whose days began and ended with private prayer and meditation. The answer was a matter of eternal verities, affecting the highest of all concerns in this life: how to serve God in spirit and in truth. Divine law as laid down in Scripture, above all in the Ten Commandments, prohibited false worship, everything that represented or smacked of idols, and the idol-service of banned or banished images. Objects and forms of behaviour that contravened the Decalogue prohibitions against serving other gods or worshipping images, must be done away. A cross on a church steeple, as much as a husband telling his wife ‘I thee worship’, both came to seem, to the purest of the purifiers, contraventions of that law.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes and References
Ben Jonson, Bartholomew Fair, III, vi; cf. V, v, for the ‘good Banbury vapours’ of Busy’s outburst against stage-players; Works of Ben Jonson, ed. C. H. Herford, P. and E. Simpson, 11 vols (Oxford, 1925–52), VI, pp. 84–5, 133.
Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Period of the Reformation, ed. W. H. Frere and W. M. Kennedy (Alcuin Club Collections, XIV–XVI, 1910), III, pp. 8, 16 (my italics); cf. II, p. 126;
M. Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, I (Oxford, 1988), pp. 298–300.
The Political Works of James I, ed. C. H. McIlwain (Cambridge, MA, and London, 1918), p. 125, from ‘A Premonition to all Most Mightie Monarches, Kings, Free Princes, and States of Christendome’. James makes clear the important distinction between crucifix and plain cross, with not even ‘resemblance or representation of eyes or ears’.
C. L. Kingsford, ‘Essex House, formerly Leicester House and Exeter Inn’, Archaeologia, LXXIII (1923), 46; Statutes of the Realm, IV, ii, p. 1082 (3 Jac. I, c. 5; xv);
R. Parker, A Scholasticall Discourse (1607), pp. 7, 10, 11.
On Parker and his ambiguous position between orthodoxy and dissent see the Dictionary of National Biography (DNB), and P. Collinson, Godly People: Essays on English Protestantism and Puritanism (1983), p. 531.
Exod. 33: 20; Deut. 4:12; J. Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, ed. J. T. McNeill, trans. F. L. Battles, 2 vols (1961), I, p. 112, cf. pp. 99–103 (Bk I, ch. xi, 1–3 and 12);
W. Perkins, A Warning against the Idolatrie of the last times (Cambridge, 1601), pp. 21–2, 24–5; Political Works of James I, p. 125.
Certain Sermons or Homilies (Oxford, 1844), pp. 196, 199, 239; Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, pp. 322–3.
P. Collinson, Archbishop Grindal 1519–1583: The Struggle for a Reformed Church (1979), pp. 190, 198–9, 201, 203;
The Life of Adam Martindale, written by himself, ed. R. Parkinson (Chetham Society, IV, 1845), pp. 156–8;
R. C. Richardson, Puritanism in North-West England: A Regional Study of the Diocese of Chester to 1642 (Manchester, 1972), p. 158;
Jeremy Goring, Godly Exercises or the Devil’s Dance? Puritanism and Popular Culture in pre-Civil War England (1983).
W. Harrison, The Description of England, ed. G. Edelen (Ithaca, NY, 1968), pp. 35–6.
[A. Gilby], A Pleasaunt Dialogue (Middelburg? 1581), sigs. Dlr, L7r, M2v–3r; The Seconde Parte of a Register, ed. A. Peel, 2 vols (Cambridge, 1915), I, pp. 74–5; The Reformation of Religion by Josiah (1590?), sig B2V. .
Correspondence of Matthew Parker, ed. J. Bruce (Parker Society, Gambridge, 1853), pp. 234, 236, 238;
H. C. Porter, Reformation and Reaction in Tudor Cambridge (Cambridge, 1958), pp. 110, 114.
W. Hinde, A Faithfull Remonstrance of… John Bruen (1641), pp. 18, 28, 47, 128–9;
G. Ormerod, The History of the County Palatine and City of Chester, 3 vols (1882), II, p. 314.
Hinde, Remonstance, p. 78–9. On William Hinde, c. 1569–1629, see DNB. Bunbury, where he was perpetual curate from 1603 until his death, is only a few hours’ ride from Tarvin and Bruen Stapleford, and Hinde was a personal friend of Bruen’s and at his deathbed.
Hinde, Remonstrance, pp. 79–80.
BL Harl. MS 2151, ff. 37r–38r, at 37v; Ormerod, County Palatine, II, pp. 306–14. What seems to have been a simple wall monument, with a ‘table of arms’, was erected for John Bruen (d. Jan. 1625) on the south side of Tarvin church.
BL Harl. MS 6607, ‘A Godly Profitable Collection of Divers Sentences out of Holy Scripture’, ff. 24r, 25v, 40r.
John Jewel, An Apology of the Church of England, ed. J. E. Booty (Ithaca, NY, 1963), p. 115;
M. Aston, Faith and Fire (1993), pp. 296–7 (‘commandeth’ a misprint for ‘commendeth’); Homilies, p. 165 on Deut. 7:5.
Edward Peacock (ed.), English Church Furniture, Ornaments and Decorations, at the Period of the Reformation (1866), p. 142n; Richardson, Puritanism, pp. 122–3.
Rites of Durham, ed. J. T. Fowler (Surtees Society, CVII, 1903), p. 28;
P. D. A. Harvey, ‘Where was Banbury Cross?’ Oxoniensia, XXXI (1966), 83–106, at 101–6.
H. Peacham, The Art of Drawing (1606), pp. 63–5;
Peacham, The Gentlemans Exercise (1612), pp. 11–12.
W. Perkins, A Reformed Catholike (Cambridge, 1598), p. 172; Perkins, Warning against Idolatrie, pp. 106–7.
Visitation Articles and Injunctions of the Early Stuart Church, ed. Kenneth Fincham (Church of England Rec. Soc, Woodbridge, 1994), I, pp. 37, 39, 45, 48, 50, 105, 110, 114, 194; cf. 113, 161, and on Montagu, p. xviii; Articles of Enquiry and Direction for the Diocese of Norwich (Cambridge, 1638), Tit. 2.14.
BL Harl. MS 6607, f. 15v.
Political Works of James I, p. 124; BL Harl. MS 159, f. 136r–v (my punctuation). On this source see Conrad Russell, Parliaments and English Politics 1621–1629 (Oxford, 1982), p. xx;
K. Fincham and P. Lake, ‘The Ecclesiastical Policy of King James I’, Journal of British Studies, 24 (1985), 170.
W. Prynne, Histrio-Mastix. The Players Scourge (1633), p. 865, marginal note.
G. I. Soden, Godfrey Goodman, Bishop of Gloucester, 1583–1656 (1953), pp. 236–42 (cited at 239); Calendar of State Papers Domestic, 1650, p. 261 (31 July 1650, orders for demolition of royal statues at St Paul’s and the Royal Exchange, London).
M. Archer, ‘English Painted Glass in the Seventeenth Century: The early work of Abraham van Linge’, Apollo, CI (Jan. 1975), 26–31;
T. G. Jackson. The Church of St. Mary the Virgin, Oxford (Oxford, 1897), pp. 61, 63, 127–8.
Paul Slack, ‘The Public Conscience of Henry Sherfield’, in J. Morrill, P. Slack and D. Woolf (eds), Public Duty and Private Conscience in Seventeenth-Century England (Oxford, 1993), pp. 151–71;
Paul Slack, ‘Religious protest and urban authority: the case of Henry Sherfield, iconoclast, 1633’, in Studies in Church History, vol. 9 (1972), 295–302;
Complete Collection of State Trials, ed. W. Cobbett and T. B. Howell, 33 vols (London, 1809–26), III, cols 519, 521, 537, 543, 550, 554;
Churchwardens’ Accounts of S. Edmund and S. Thomas, Sarum, ed. H.J. F. Swayne (Salisbury, 1896), p. 294; Rites of Durham, pp. 76–7; Visitation Articles, ed. Frere and Kennedy, III, p. 323, cf. p. 104.
State Trials, III, col. 522; Churchwardens’ Accounts, Sarum, p. 190.
State Trials, III, cols 525, 539, 543, 545, 546–7.
State Trials, III, cols 541, 547.
Jacqueline Eales, Puritans and Roundheads: The Harleys of Brampton Bryan and the Outbreak of the English Civil War (Cambridge, 1990), pp. 47, 54, 78.
BL MS Harl. 165, ff. 21v, 22v.
BL MS Harl. 165, ff. 21r–23r; [W. Prynne], A New Discovery of the Prelates Tyranny (London, 1641), pp. 91–109, 218–26; W. Prynne, The Antipathie of the English Lordly Prelacie (1641), I, p. 223, II, pp. 290–1. On Sions Plea and Leighton’s case see Stephen Foster, Notes from the Caroline Underground (Hamden, CT, 1978), pp. 30–9.
[W. Prynne], Newes from Ipswich ([Edinburgh and ?London, 1636]), title and sigs. A3V–A4V; Prynne, Antipathie of the Prelacie, II, p. 291; R. V. H. Burne, ‘The History of Chester Cathedral’, Journal of the Chester and North Wales Archil, Archaeol, and Hist. Soc, XXXIX (1952), 82–5. According to Prynne ‘fear of questioning’ led Bridgeman to reinter the altar after the meeting of the Long Parliament. Some substance is lent to Prynne’s charge by John Ley, parson of Great Budworth, Cheshire, in A Letter (Against the erection of an Altar), addressed to the bishop of Chester in June 1635, and published at the end of the author’s Defensive Doubts (1641). According to the bishop’s reported reply (pp. 24–5) ‘the materials (whereof it [the altar] was made) were found ready for such a purpose’ when seats were removed from the upper end of the chancel to the west end of the cathedral. Bridgeman said that ‘hearing great offence was taken at it’ he had the altar taken down.
J. S. Morrill, Cheshire 1630–1660: County Government and Society during the English Revolution (Oxford, 1974), p.36; Lords Journal, 4, p. 225; BL Harl. MS 165, f. 23r (Matth. 18:17).
BL Add. MS 70002, ff. 206r, 213r; Eales, Puritans and Roundheads, p. 47.
Exod. 32:20; Eales, Puritans and Roundheads, p. 49.
William Hunt, The Puritan Moment: The Coming of Revolution in an English County (Cambridge, MA, 1983), p. 288; Aston, Faith and Fire, p. 298.
Commons Journal II, p. 72; The Orders from the House of Commons (BL, E. 171 (8), p. 4); John Morrill, The Nature of the English Revolution (1993), pp. 73–4.
Constitutional Documents of the Puritan Revolution, ed. S. R. Gardiner (Oxford, 1951), pp. 197–8; 8 Sept. 1641 order (BL 669.f.3(14) ); Morrill, English Revolution, pp. 75–7; Aston, England’s Iconoclasts, I, pp. 75–6.
E. Dering, A Collection of Speeches… in matter of Religion (1642), pp. 3, 5–6, 50, 81, 84–6;
N. Tyacke, The Fortunes of English Puritanism, 1603–1640 (1989), p. 21.
T. P. S. Woods, Prelude to Civil War 1642: Mr. Justice Malet and the Kentish Petition (Salisbury, 1980), p. 142;
Alan Everitt, The Community of Kent and the Great Rebellion 1640–60 (Leicester, 1966), pp. 95–107.
Lucy Hutchinson, Memoirs of the Life of Colonel Hutchinson, ed. J. Sutherland (1973), p. 54; Morrill, Cheshire, p. 36;
J. Morrill, ‘Sir William Brereton and England’s Wars of Religion’, Journal of British Studies, XXIV (1985), 311–32; [B.Ryves], Mercurius Rusticus ([Oxford] 1646), pp.22–3; Christopher Woodforde, English Stained and Painted Glass (Oxford, 1954), pp. 45–6.
BL Add MS 70003, ff. 158r–v, 161r, 162r (draft of Leominster letter); Eales, Puritans and Roundheads, pp. 32, 115–16.
J. Vicars, The Sinfuless and Unlawfulness, of having or making the Picture of Christs Humanity (1641), p. 38;
C. H. Firth and R. S. Rait (eds), Acts and Ordinances of the Interregnum, 3 vols (1911), I, pp. 265–6, 425–6.
J. Morrill, ‘William Dowsing, the Bureacratic Puritan’, in Morrill, Slack and Woolf (eds), Public Duty, pp. 173–203.
BL Add. MS 70005 (not foliated); Culmer receipt dated 14 June 1645; Richard Culmer, Cathedrall Newes from Canterbury (1644), pp. 2, 6; Eales, Puritans and Roundheads, p. 183.
Paul S. Seaver, Wallington’s World: A Puritan Artisan in Seventeenth-Century London (1985), p. 151; Morrill, English Revolution, p. 76; The Petition of the Weamen of Middlesex (1641), sig. A2r; Commons Journal, II, p. 35.
H. Dixon, ‘Original Account of the Springett Family’, Gentleman’s Magazine, October, 1851, p. 372, cited Everitt, Community of Kent, p. 148.
The Inventories and Valuations of the King’s Goods 1649–1651, ed. Oliver Millar, Walpole Society, 43 (1970–2), xi, xiii, n. 5;
Claude Phillips, The Picture Gallery of Charles 7(1896), p. 47; C. Thomas-Stanford, Sussex in the Great Civil War and the Interregnum 1642–1660 (1910), pp. 153–4, cited P. Collinson, From Iconoclasm to Iconophobia (Reading, 1986), p. 28; Eales, Puritans and Roundheads, p. 184. On executioners’ roles in the ritual punishment of idols see S. Michalski, The Reformation and the Visual Arts (1993), pp. 90–1.
Inventories, ed. Millar, xxii, 205, 257–8, 299, 310, 315; W. L. F. Nuttall, ‘King Charles I’s Pictures and the Commonwealth Sale’, Apollo, LXXXII (Oct. 1965), 306; Dering, Collection of Speeches, p. 10.
G. E. Aylmer and R. Cant (eds), A History of York Minster (Oxford, 1977), p. 315.
Editor information
Copyright information
© 1996 Margaret Aston
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aston, M. (1996). Puritans and Iconoclasm, 1560–1660. In: Durston, C., Eales, J. (eds) The Culture of English Puritanism, 1560–1700. Themes in Focus. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24437-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24437-9_4
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59746-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24437-9
eBook Packages: Palgrave Religion & Philosophy CollectionPhilosophy and Religion (R0)