Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Social History in Perspective ((SHP))

  • 41 Accesses

Abstract

In 1903 Herbert Gladstone, the Liberal chief whip, negotiated a secret electoral pact with Ramsay MacDonald, secretary of the LRC, to deny the Unionists the advantage of a split progressive vote. Building upon these electoral arrangements some social radicals wished to construct a permanent ideological accommodation. An ‘organicist’ intellectual synthesis, the project was to extend beyond traditional boundaries, Liberal and socialist, to embrace progressive concepts of distributive justice, industrial conciliation and social democracy, while upholding the principles of individual liberty, equality of opportunity and reward for initiative. No longer guaranteed by laissez-faire individualism, social harmony was to be underwritten by limited collectivism, by intervention sufficient to ensure distributive justice for the working class while preserving free trade and the continuance of capitalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Martin Pugh, The Making of Modern British Politics 1867–1939 (Oxford, 1982), pp. 117–18

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Bentley, The Climax of Liberal Politics: British Liberalism in Theory and Practice 1868–1918 (London, 1987), p. 29.

    Google Scholar 

  3. P. F. Clarke, Lancashire and the New Liberalism (Cambridge, 1971).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. A. W. Purdue, ‘The Liberal and Labour Parties in North-East Politics 1900–1914: The Struggle for Supremacy’, International Review of Social History, 26 (1981), pp. 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. K. O. Morgan, ‘The New Liberalism and the Challenge of Labour: The Welsh Experience, 1885–1929’, in K. D. Brown (ed.), Essays in Anti-Labour History (London, 1974), pp. 159–82.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Avner Offer, Property and Politics 1870–1914. Landownership, Law, Ideology and Urban Development in England (Cambridge, 1981), ch. 22;

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. B. Gilbert, ‘David Lloyd George: Land, the Budget and Social Reform’, American History Review, 81 (1976), pp. 1058–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quoted in D. Powell, ‘The New Liberalismn and the Rise of Labour, 1886–1906’, Historical Journal, 29 (1986), p. 391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Quoted in R. Barker, ‘Socialism and Progressivism in the Political Thought of Ramsay MacDonald’, in A. J. A. Morris (ed.), Edwardian Radicalism 1900–1914 (London, 1974), p. 124.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pat Thane, ‘Labour and Local Politics: Radicalism, Democracy and Social Reform, 1890–1914’ in E. F. Biagini and H. J. Reid (eds), Currents of Radicalism: Popular Radicalism, Organized Labour and Party Politics in Britain 1850–1914 (Cambridge, 1991), pp. 261–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quoted in David Martin, ‘“The Instruments of the People”?: the Parliamentary Labour Party in 1906’ in D. Martin and D. Rubinstein (eds), Ideology and the Labour Movement (London, 1979), pp. 135–6.

    Google Scholar 

  12. P. Thane, ‘The Labour Party and State “Welfare”’, in K. D. Brown (ed.), The First Labour Party 1906–1914 (Beckenham, 1985), pp. 183–216.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quoted in Alun Howkins, ‘Edwardian Liberalism and Industrial Unrest: A Class View of the Decline of Liberalism,’ History Workshop Journal 4 (1977), p. 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Joseph White, ‘A Panegyric on Edwardian Progressivism’, Journal of British Studies, 16 (1977), pp. 145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. D. Clark, Colne Valley: Radicalism to Socialism (London, 1981) ch. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  16. James Hinton, Labour and Socialism. A History of the British Labour Movement 1867–1974 (Brighton, 1983), p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  17. John Lovell, British Trade Unions 1875–1933 (London, 1977) pp. 46–9.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Patricia Hollis, ‘Women in Council: Separate Spheres, Public Space’, in Jane Rendall (ed.), Equal or Different: Women’s Politics 1800–1914 (Oxford, 1987), pp. 194–5, and 209.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J. Liddington and J. Norris, One Hand Tied Behind Us: The Rise of the Women’s Suffrage Movement (London, 1978), pp. 120–37.

    Google Scholar 

  20. G. L. Bernstein, ‘Liberalism and the Progressive Alliance in the Constituencies, 1900–1914: Three Case Studies’, Historical Journal, 26 (1983), pp. 617–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Martin Petter, ‘The Progressive Alliance’, History, 58 (1973), p. 51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Quoted in M. Freeden, The New Liberalism: An Ideology of Social Reform (Oxford, 1978), p. 149.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ross McKibbin, The Evolution of the Labour Party 1910–1924 (Oxford, 1974), p. 245

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jon Lawrence, ‘Class and gender in the Making of Urban Toryism, 1880–1914’, English Historical Review, 108 (1993), Pp. 629–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. C. G. Matthew, R. I. McKibbin and J. A. Kay, ‘The Franchise Factor in the Rise of the Labour Party’, English Historical Review, 91 (1976), pp. 723–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1996 John Belchem

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Belchem, J. (1996). Liberals, Labour and the Progressive Alliance. In: Popular Radicalism in Nineteenth-Century Britain. Social History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24390-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24390-7_10

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-56575-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24390-7

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics