Skip to main content

Pressing On

  • Chapter
Justifying Language

Part of the book series: Studies in Literature and Religion ((SLR))

  • 22 Accesses

Abstract

Hope is divided. It is never itself. Or, it may be that when I hope time is not quite itself. Already, the logic of hope demands that this too must be questioned because of its tense: because of a presence and an identity in the ‘is’, beyond which hope has already progressed. To speak of a time ‘when I hope’ is also to compromise its strange temporality. In its refusal to be confined to any temporal dimension, hope puts the time-handling linguistic device of ‘tense’ under pressure. It is not possible to hope without a history and a futurity, so hope cannot be grasped by a purported present. It has to be traced as a trajectory through time.

For we are saved by hope: but hope that is seen, is not hope: for what a man seeth, why doth he yet hope for?

(Romans 8:24)

... [H]ope which does not want to be just as far at any end as it was at the beginning, does away with the sharp cycle.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. B. Russell, A History of Western Philosophy (London: Unwin, 1946, 1984 ), p. 182.

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Arnold, ‘Dover Beach’, in The Poems of Matthew Arnold, ed. K. Allott ( London: Longmans, 1965 ), pp. 239–43.

    Google Scholar 

  3. J. Moltmann, The Experiment Hope, ed. and trans. M. D. Meeks ( London: SCM, 1975 ), p. 19.

    Google Scholar 

  4. J.-F. Lyotard, The Differend, pp. 151–81. See also C. Norris, What’s Wrong With Postmodernism: Critical Theory and the Ends of Philosophy ( New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1990 ), pp. 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  5. S. Kierkegaard, Fear and Trembling, ed. and trans. H. V. & E. H. Hong ( Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983 ), p. 53.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Kevin Mills

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mills, K. (1995). Pressing On. In: Justifying Language. Studies in Literature and Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24283-2_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics