Skip to main content

Acid Rain: A Business-as-Usual Scenario

  • Chapter
UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s

Abstract

Acid rain dominated the environmental policy agenda during much of the 1980s and, for the UK, it became the defining issue of the decade. Environmental groups dubbed the UK the ‘dirty man of Europe’ because of its reluctance to participate in the ‘30 per cent club’ agreement to reduce acid emissions. The position on acid rain came to symbolise what many saw as a wider weakness in environmental policy making. The agreement of the EC’s LCPD in 1988 signalled the end of an era marked by debate about whether and by how much emissions of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxides, the main precursors of acid rain, should be cut.

Jim Skea is British Gas/Economic and Social Research Council Professorial Fellow of Clean Technologies and Industry in the SPRU at the University of Sussex. He is grateful for the support of these two bodies. This chapter was improved by discussions which took place during the Colloquium ‘UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s’ in the Department of Politics, University of Newcastle, in December 1993. Subsequent correspondence with Nigel Haigh was particularly helpful. Tony Ikwue of SPRU also provided helpful input. However, the author remains solely responsible for the views expressed and for any residual errors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Boehmer-Christiansen, S. and Skea, J. (1991), Acid Politics; Environmental and Energy Policies in Britain and Germany (London: Belhaven Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1984), ‘Council Directive on the Combating of Air Pollution from Industrial Plants’ (84/360/EEC), Official Journal of the European Communities, L 188/20, Brussels, 16 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1992), Towards Sustainability: A European Community Programme of Policy and Action in relation to the Environment and Sustainable Development. COM(92) 23 final, Brussels, 17 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission of the European Communities (1993), Proposal for a Council Directive on Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control, COM(93) 423 final, Brussels, 14 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE (1990a), This Common Inheritance: Britain’s Environmental Strategy (London: HMSO) Cmnd 1200.

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE(1990b), The UK’s Programme and National Plan for Reducing Emissions of SO2, and NO. from Existing Large Combustion Plants (London: DoE).

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE (1993) Making Markets Work for the Environment (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • DoE(undated), Integrated Pollution Control: A Practical Guide (London: DoE).

    Google Scholar 

  • DNV Technica Ltd (1992), NO× Pollution Control for the UK Power Industry? Report to the DoE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDS (1993a), ‘Government Protects British Coal in Talks on new SO2 Target’, Report No. 222.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDS (1993b), ‘UK Concession on SO2 Emission Targets’, Report No. 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • ENDS (1994), ‘FGD Arrives—But Future SO2 Control Policy Remains Uncertain’, Report No. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  • HM Government (1984), Statement by the UK Delegation at the Munich Air Pollution Conference, 24–27 June 1984, reproduced in House of Commons Environment Committee, Acid Rain, Volume II Minutes of Evidence, Fourth Report, Session 1983–84, HC 446–11 (London: HMSO) 302–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • HMIP (1991), Chief Inspector’s Guidance to Inspectors — Combustion Processes: Large Boilers and Furnaces 50 MW(th) and Over, IPR 1/1 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Commons Energy Committee (1990), The Flue Gas Desulphurisation Programme, Third Report, Session 1989–90, HC 371 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullis, J. (1993), ‘Critical Loads: The Political Background’, Paper presented at the conference Acid Rain and its Impact: The Critical Loads.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Grid Company plc (1993), 1993 Seven Year Statement (Coventry: National Grid Company).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Power plc (1993), National Power Environmental Performance Review 1992 (Swindon: National Power).

    Google Scholar 

  • PowerGen plc (1994), Environmental Performance Report (Solihull: PowerGen plc).

    Google Scholar 

  • Private communication (1993), Dutch negotiating team.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skea, J. (1990), Acid Emissions from Stationary Plant: Reopening the Debate (London: Friends of the Earth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weir, F. (1993), From ‘Dirty Man’ to ‘Drittsekk’: UK Acid Rain Policy (London: Friends of the Earth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetstone, G. S. and Rosencranz, A. (1983), Acid Rain in Europe and North America: National Responses to an International Problem (Washington, DC: Environmental Law Institute).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Skea, J. (1995). Acid Rain: A Business-as-Usual Scenario. In: Gray, T.S. (eds) UK Environmental Policy in the 1990s. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24237-5_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics