Bush and the Sandinistas 1989

  • David Ryan

Abstract

The Reagan attempt to rollback the Sandinista revolution had effectively ended in February 1988 with the vote to end contra military aid. They were no longer a credible force within Washington’s objectives and now had to find the most viable way to survive the transitional period. The Sandinistas too continued their negotiating strategy. After the defeat of military aid a broad coalition of support was given for non-lethal aid of $47.9 million which was passed in late March. A congressional report indicated that Reagan’s ‘lame duck’ presidency had little influence on the debate; more important were the events in the region and some tentative agreement in Congress. Even the Sandinistas acquiesced to the aid as long as it was channelled through neutral organizations. The Sandinista-Contra negotiations towards a permanent cease-fire broke up on 9 June 1988 without agreement, probably because of division amongst the contra leadership factions. The first comprehensive Sandinista proposal was rejected while contra leader Alfredo César began secret talks with Humberto Ortega and Paul Reichler, an American legal representative to the Sandinistas. According to the Center for International Policy, César presented a list of reforms that had to be met before the contra directorate would sign any agreement. In late May the Sandinistas accepted the points, resulting in further and unconstitutional demands put forward by the Bermúdez faction of the contras.

Keywords

Assure Beach Arena Defend Boris 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. 2.
    Paul S. Reichler, ‘More Contra Aid: Torching the Talks,’ New York Times, 4 August 1988Google Scholar
  2. Wire Services, ‘Contras Reject Ortega’s Peace Talks Proposal,’ Los Angeles Times, 13 August 1988Google Scholar
  3. Richard Boudreaux, ‘Ortega Shuts Door on Contra Talks,’ Los Angeles Times, 14 August 1988.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Lindsey Gruson, ‘Shultz, at OAS Supports Contras,’ New York Times, 15 November 1988Google Scholar
  5. Robert Pear, ‘Bush Aides Speak of New Policy Of Diplomacy in Central America,’ New York Times, 20 November 1988Google Scholar
  6. John M. Goshko, ‘Latin Leaders Watching for Hints of Bush Policy,’ Washington Post, in USIA PDQ index and text database, 13 November 1988Google Scholar
  7. Robert Pear, ‘Baker at the State Dept: Pragmatism Over Zeal,’ New York Times, 15 November 1988Google Scholar
  8. William LeoGrande, ‘From Reagan to Bush: The Transition in US Policy Towards Central America,’ Journal of Latin American Studies 22, no. 3 (October 1990), pp. 620–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 4.
    Stephen Kinzer, ‘Nicaragua and Rebels Expect Fresh Effort From Bush to Resolve Conflicts,’ New York Times, 20 November 1988Google Scholar
  10. Robert Pear, ‘Bush Aides Speak of New Policy Of Diplomacy in Central American,’ New York Times, 20 November 1988Google Scholar
  11. William I. Robinson, ‘George Bush and Nicaragua,’ Central America Information Bulletin 5, no. 36 (16 November 1988), p. 1Google Scholar
  12. 6.
    Richard Boudreaux, ‘Ortega Rejects Talks on 2 Rival Contra Truce Plans,’ Los Angeles Times, 1 January 1989Google Scholar
  13. Stephen Kinzer, ‘Contra Leaders Disagree on Peace Plan,’ New York Times, 1 January 1989Google Scholar
  14. Reuter, ‘Ortega Attacks Peace Summit Postponement,’ The Sunday Times (London), 8 January 198Google Scholar
  15. Isabel Hilton, ‘Central American Summit Postponed,’ The Independent (London), 11 January 1989Google Scholar
  16. Julia Preston, ‘Central America Looks To Bush for Solutions,’ Washington Post, 22 January 1989Google Scholar
  17. Stephen Kinzer, ‘Anti-Sandinistas Say US Should End Embargo,’ New York Times, 12 January 1989Google Scholar
  18. David Adams, ‘Nicaragua Opposition on the Move,’ The Independent (London), 16 January 1989.Google Scholar
  19. 7.
    George Bush, ‘In the Footsteps of Washington on ‘Democracy’s Front Porch,’ The Independent (London), 21 January 1989Google Scholar
  20. John Lichfield, ‘Bush to Nominate a Hard Liner to Control Latin America Policy,’ The Independent (London), 2 February 1989Google Scholar
  21. Robert Pear, ‘Bush Backing Democrat for Post On Latin America in State Dept.,’ New York Times, 2 February 1989Google Scholar
  22. Norma Romano-Benner, ‘Arias Optimistic About US Support for Peace Plan,’ USIA Text Link, 3 February 1989Google Scholar
  23. Alan Riding, ‘Quayle in Caracas to Hail New Chief,’ New York Times, 2 February 1989Google Scholar
  24. Simon Fisher, ‘Venezuela’s New Leader Draws a Record Gathering,’ The Independent (London), 2 February 1989Google Scholar
  25. Simon Fisher, ‘Central American Peace Process Revives,’ International Policy Update, 4 February 1989, pp. 1–8Google Scholar
  26. Washington Office on Latin America, ‘New Possibilities for Central American Peace After Caracas,’ Peace Plan Monitor, no. 6, (7 February 1989), pp. 1–4.Google Scholar
  27. Mark A. Uhlig, ‘A Latin Peace Plan Not So Broad: Ball in Nicaragua’s Court,’ New York Times, 16 February 1989Google Scholar
  28. ACAN, ‘Azcona Sure US to Accept Contra Decision,’ FBIS LAT-89-030, 15 February 1989, p. 2Google Scholar
  29. Chris Norton, ‘Contras Seek Democracy before Demobilization,’ The Independent (London), 16 February 1989Google Scholar
  30. Lindsey Gruson, ‘Despite Pact, Contras Vow to Fight On,’ New York Times, 18 February 1989Google Scholar
  31. Bernard Weinraub, ‘Bush, Uneasy About Latin Pact, Wants Contra Humanitarian Aid,’ New York Times, 17 February 1989Google Scholar
  32. Editorial, ‘Why Not Help the Nicaraguan Deal?’ New York Times, 17 February 1989Google Scholar
  33. John Lichfield, ‘White House Trips Up Over New Plans to Disarm Contras,’ The Independent (London), 18 February 1989Google Scholar
  34. Centre for International Policy, ‘El Salvador Presidential Summit Advances Peace Process,’ International Policy Update, 21 February 1989Google Scholar
  35. Robert Pear, ‘Contras Chafing at US Indecision,’ New York Times, 23 February 1989Google Scholar
  36. 11.
    Editorial, ‘The Shout from Central America,’ New York Times, 26 February 1989Google Scholar
  37. Alex Brummer, ‘Bush Committed to Further Contra Aid,’ The Guardian (London), 3 March 1989Google Scholar
  38. Robert Pear, ‘Report is Urging an Overhaul of US Latin Policy,’ New York Times, 9 March 1989Google Scholar
  39. 13.
    Robert Pear, ‘Tentative Accord Set in Washington on Aid to Contras,’ New York Times, 24 March 1989Google Scholar
  40. Bernard Weinraub, ‘Bush and Congress Sign Policy Accord on Aid to the Contras,’ New York Times, 25 March 1989Google Scholar
  41. David E. Rosenbaum, ‘Congress Appears to Support Contra Aid Plan,’ New York Times, 25 March 1989Google Scholar
  42. Thomas L. Friedman, ‘Contras’ Leaders Urged to return Home for Election,’ New York Times, 29 March 198Google Scholar
  43. Martin Walker, ‘Bush Urges Contras to Return Home,’ The Guardian (London), 30 March 198Google Scholar
  44. 15.
    W. Raymond Duncan and Carolyn McGiffert Ekedahl, Moscow and the Third World Under Gorbachev (Boulder: Westview Press, 1990), pp. 191, 196Google Scholar
  45. Fred Halliday, Cold War, Third World: An Essay on Soviet—American Relations, (London: Hutchinson Radius, 1989), pp. 137–138, 141Google Scholar
  46. Miller, Soviet Relations with Latin America 1959–1987, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989), pp. 203–204, 216Google Scholar
  47. Donna Rich-Kaplowitz, ‘The US Response to Soviet and Cuban Policies in Central America,’ both in Wayne S. Smith, ed. The Russians Aren’t Coming’ New Soviet Policy in Latin America, (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1992), pp. 93, 110Google Scholar
  48. Voytek Zubek, ‘Soviet “New Thinking” and the Central American Crisis,’ Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 29, no. 3 (Fall 1987), p. 89Google Scholar
  49. Mikhail Gorbachev, Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World, (New York: Harper and Row, 1987), p. 175.Google Scholar
  50. 17.
    Jonathan Steele, ‘Moscow Ties the Knot,’ The Guardian (London), 1 April 198Google Scholar
  51. Bill Keller, ‘Gorbachev-Castro Face Off: A Clash of Style and Policies.’ New York Times, 2 April 1989Google Scholar
  52. Bill Keller, ‘Gorbachev Eclipsed,’ New York Times, 6 April 1989Google Scholar
  53. Bernard Weinraub, ‘US Dismisses Call by Gorbachev To End Latin America Arms Aid,’ New York Times, 6 April 1989Google Scholar
  54. S. Neil MacFarlane, ‘Bush’s Missing Link in Nicaragua,’ New York Times, 6 April 1989.Google Scholar
  55. 19.
    AP., ‘Managua Rivals Urge End to Contras,’ New York Times, 5 August 1989Google Scholar
  56. Robert Pear, ‘US Official Presses for an Extension for Contras,’ New York Times, 3 August 1989.Google Scholar
  57. 21.
    Robert Pear, ‘Democrats Warn US Must Support Contras Eviction,’ New York Times, 9 August 1989Google Scholar
  58. Editorial, ‘Mr. Bush, Alone on Nicaragua,’ New York Times 8 August 1989Google Scholar
  59. William Branigin and Lee Hockstader, ‘5 Presidents Agree to Disband Contras,’ Washington Post, 8 August 1989Google Scholar
  60. Alexander Sullivan and Edmund Scherr, ‘US Supports Tela Accord on Peace in Central America,’ USIA, Text Link, 8 August 1989Google Scholar
  61. William LeoGrande, ‘How to Dispose of the Contras,’ New York Times, 9 August 1989.Google Scholar
  62. 22.
    Mark A. Uhlig, ‘The Contras: Lost Cause?’ New York Times, 10 August 1989Google Scholar
  63. Larry Rohter, ‘Central America Goes Its Own Way,’ New York Times, 13 August 1989Google Scholar
  64. Robert Pear, ‘Clash of Experts Blurs Policy on Central America,’ New York Times, 24 August 1989.Google Scholar
  65. 23.
    AP, ‘Nicaragua Foes Come Face to Face and Chat,’ New York Times, 27 August 1989Google Scholar
  66. Paul Lewis, ‘Contras Said to Sell Arms to Salvador Rebels,’ New York Times, 15 October 1989Google Scholar
  67. Simon Tisdall, ‘Contras Sell Weapons to Leftwingers,’ The Guardian (London), 16 October 198Google Scholar
  68. Peter James Spielmann, ‘UN Force Due For Central America,’ The Independent (London), 13 October 198Google Scholar
  69. Martin Walker, ‘US Snubs Soviet Initiative in Central America,’ The Guardian (London), 6 October 198Google Scholar
  70. Mark A. Uhlig, ‘Soviets Reducing Arms for Managua,’ New York Times, 11 October 1989.Google Scholar
  71. 24.
    David Adams, ‘Ortega War Pledge Sours American Democracy Fiesta,’ The Observer (London), 29 October 198Google Scholar
  72. Lindsey Gruson, ‘Ortega Declares He Will Abandon Nicaraguan Truce,’ New York Times, 28 October 1989Google Scholar
  73. Mark A. Uhlig, ‘Nicaraguans Begin Sweep Against Contra Stronghold,’ New York Times, 28 October 1989Google Scholar
  74. Lindsey Gruson, ‘Ortega Modifies Stand on Ending Civil War Truce,’ New York Times, 29 October 1989Google Scholar
  75. Mark A. Uhlig, ‘Ortega’s Foray: A Stunning Misstep,’ New York Times, 30 October 1989.Google Scholar
  76. 25.
    Mark A. Uhlig, ‘Ortega’s Foray: A Stunning Misstep,’ New York Times, 30 October 1989Google Scholar
  77. Nicholas Young and Martin Walker, ‘Managua Suspends Truce With Contras,’ The Guardian (London), 2 November 198Google Scholar
  78. Daniel Ortega Saavedra, ‘Why I Ended the Ceasefire,’ New York Times, 2 November 1989Google Scholar
  79. Robert Pear, ‘Anger With Ortega Unites Policy Makers in US,’ New York Times, 2 November 1989.Google Scholar
  80. 26.
    Paul Lewis, ‘UN to Send Observers,’ New York Times, 8 November 1989Google Scholar
  81. Paul Lewis, ‘New Contra Chiefs Say Disarming Before Election Would Be Foolish,’ New York Times, 11 November 1989Google Scholar
  82. AP, ‘Managua Offer,’ The Independent (London), 22 November 1989.Google Scholar
  83. 28.
    Peter Pringle, ‘Bush to Raise ‘Cold War Relics’ at Malta Summit,’ The Independent (London), 30 November 1989.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© David Ryan 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Ryan
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Historical and International StudiesDe Montfort UniversityLeicesterUK

Personalised recommendations