Skip to main content

The Judiciary and the ‘State of Law’

  • Chapter
Book cover The Government and Politics of Spain

Part of the book series: Comparative Government and Politics ((CGP))

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

After nearly four decades of dictatorship under General Franco, it was to be expected that the 1978 Constitution should place particular emphasis on legal accountability: the rule of law must underpin any democratic state’s claim to political legitimacy. Of course, all regimes seek to assert their legal authority, and the Franco dictatorship was no exception in this regard. However, in contrast to the situation in a dictatorship, the declaration that the law is supreme in a democracy requires that citizens be able to enforce that law (Díaz, 1979: 11, 13–18). Thus, a central concern of Spain’s new democracy was that it should be established as a ‘state of law’ (estado de derecho) in the sense of its constitutional arrangements being both legally accountable and enforceable. Yet, surprisingly, English-language texts on post-Franco Spanish politics have virtually ignored the legal dimension of the democratic state.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Paul Heywood

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Heywood, P. (1995). The Judiciary and the ‘State of Law’. In: The Government and Politics of Spain. Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24152-1_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics