Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Psychology for Professional Groups ((PPG))

  • 113 Accesses

Abstract

Of all aspects of psychology, none has achieved more attention within education than intelligence. The reason for this is not hard to find. If we define intelligence as the ability to see relationships, and to use these relationships to solve problems, then we can see that there are few aspects of a child’s formal work in school that do not appear to be influenced by it in some way. Add to this the fact that high and low intelligence can carry important social and vocational significance, and it is not surprising that parents as well as teachers take a deep interest in the subject. It is probably in part because of this deep interest that many misconceptions have grown up about the nature of intelligence and its measurement, some of them actively detrimental to the child’s educational progress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Atkinson, R.L., Atkinson, R.C., Smith, E.E. and Bern, DJ. (1993) Introduction to Psychology, 11th edn. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G.V. and Depinet, R.L. (1991) A reconsideration of testing for competence rather than for intelligence. American Psychologist, 46, 1012–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbow, C.P. (1988) Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability in intellectually talented adolescents: Their nature, effects and possible causes. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 11, 169–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouchard, TJ., Lykken, D.T., McGue, M., Segal, N.L. and Tellegen, A. (1990) Sources of human psychological differences: The Minnesota study of twins reared apart. Science, 250, 223–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cattell, R.B. (1971) Abilities: Their structure, growth and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S.J. (1991) How much does schooling influence general intelligence and its cognitive components? A re-assessment of the evidence. Developmental Psychology, 27, 703–722.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comrey, A.L. and Lee, H.B. (1992) A First Course in Factor Analysis, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coren, S. and Ward, L.M. (1989) Sensation and Perception 3rd edn. San Diego: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bono, E. (1993) Water Logic. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Simonian, R. and Laird, N.M. (1983) Evaluating the effect of coaching on SAT scores: a meta-analysis. Harvard Education Review, 53, 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaddes, W.H., McKenzie, A. and Barnsley, R. (1968) Psychometric intelligence and spatial imagery in two northwest Indian and two white groups of children. Journal of Social Psychology, 75, 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, A.R. (1985) The nature of the black—white difference on various psychometric tests: Spearman’s hypothesis. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 8, 193–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, L.U. (1984) White—black achievement differences: the narrowing gap. American Psychologist, 39, 1203–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamin, L.J. (1974) The Science and Politics of IQ. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, R.L. (1982) Ability testing: individual differences, prediction, and differential prediction. In A. Wignor and W. Gardiner (Eds) Ability Testing: Uses, consequences and controversies. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M.C. and Hyde, J.S. (1989) Gender, Mathematics and Science. Paper presented to the annual conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, A., Morley, R., Cole, T., Lister, G. and Leeson-Payne, C. (1992) Breast milk and subsequent intelligence quotient in children born pre-term. The Lancet, 339, 261–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E. and Jacklin, C. (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (Ed.) (1986) The School Achievements of Minority Children. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ornstein, R. and Carstensen, L. (1990) Psychology: The study of human experience. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sattler, J.M. (1988) Assessment of Children. San Diego: Jerome H. Sattler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweinhart, L.J., Weikart, D.P. and Larner, M.B. (1986) Consequences of three preschool curriculum models through age 15. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 1, 15–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanchfield, J. (1973) Sex Differences in Learning to Read. Bloomington, Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.J. (1990) Metaphors of Mind: Conceptions of the Nature of Intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thurstone, L.L. and Thurstone, T.G. (1963) SRA Primary Abilities. Chicago: Science Research Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P.E. (1969) Intelligence and Cultural Environment. London: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, P.E. (1979) Intelligence: Heredity and environment. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner, E.E. (1972) Infants around the world: cross-cultural studies of psychomotor development from birth to two years. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology, 3, 111–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Additional reading

  • De Bono, E. (1985) The CORT thinking programme. In Segal, J.W., Chipman, P.F. and Glaser, R. (Eds) Thinking and Learning Skills Vol. I: Relating Instruction to Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Details an organized programme of thinking that increases fluency and flexibility in problem solving.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fancher, R.E. (1985) The Intelligence Men: Makers of the IQ, Controversy. New York: Norton. Discusses all the relevant issues in the debate as to the meaning and role of IQ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kail, R. and Pellegrino, J.W. (1985) Human Intelligence: Perspectives and prospects. San Francisco: W.H. Freeman. A good survey of the present position, and with interesting pointers for the future. Highly recommended.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R.M. and Saccuzzo, D. (1989) Psychologkal Testing 2nd Edn. Principles and Issues. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Good both on individual differences and the methods of assessing them.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plomin, R. (1990) Nature and Nurture. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole. Thorough survey of the nature/nurture question in intelligence and other areas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarr, S. (1982) Race, Social Class, and Individual Differences in IQ. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum. Covers the whole field of IQ and social and ethnic factors in a readable and objective way.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, RJ. (Ed.) (1985) Human Abilities: An information processing approach. New York: Freeman. A usgful overview of human cognitive abilities. More comprehensive but not so practical as de Bono’s books. (Also of releoance to Chapter 7).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, RJ. (1990) Metaphors of Mind: Conceptions of the Nature of Intelligence. One of the best surveys of current thinking on intelligence.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 David Fontana

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fontana, D. (1995). Intelligence. In: Psychology for Teachers. Psychology for Professional Groups. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24139-2_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics