Skip to main content

Development Theories and India’s Record

  • Chapter
The Government and Politics of India

Part of the book series: Comparative Government and Politics ((CGP))

  • 95 Accesses

Abstract

We have now completed our overview of the government and politics of India. It is time to put Indian politics in the context of general debates on the meaning and conditions of development. The conceptual vocabulary of development studies is profoundly rooted in the historical encounter between the European and the non-European. Is tradition necessarily an obstacle to progress and development which must be discarded? Is modernisation necessarily all good? How much conceptual coherence is there to the term ‘Third World’? The abundance of terms to refer essentially to the same group of countries reflects continuing dissatisfactions with each: backward, developing, undeveloped, underdeveloped, less developed, Third World, low income, traditional. In these days of political correctness, perhaps we should call them ‘the economically challenged’ or ‘the industrially embarrassed’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Further Reading

  • Bhagwati (1993). Argues that India’s disappointing record in generating growth stems from a distrust of growth as an instrument of poverty alleviation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty (1987). A good discussion of India’s planning machinery and process.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel (1978b). An influential study of India’s attempt to bring about rapid economic growth and reduction in socio-economic disparities without violent social change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hettne (1990). An interdisciplinary survey of social science theories of development in different historical and geographical contexts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldenburg (1993). The latest in an established series designed to provide reliable and timely updates on political, economic and foreign policy trends.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palma (1978). An excellent exposition and critique of dependency and underdevelopment theories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy and James (1992). A collection of papers by well-known India specialists on the politics and economics of the country, mainly in the 1980s.

    Google Scholar 

  • Somjee (1991). An attempt to ground development theory in the experiences of ‘emerging countries’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern (1993). Argues that India’s institutions are undergoing rapid and profound changes that are adaptive to the continuity and vitality of the underlying social system rather than disruptive of them.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson (1993). Examines the debates over imperialism, development and underdevelopment, and sets them in the context of historical change in agriculture, trade and manufacture, and the relations between business, the economy and the state.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Ramesh Thakur

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thakur, R. (1995). Development Theories and India’s Record. In: The Government and Politics of India. Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24100-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics