Abstract
We have now completed our overview of the government and politics of India. It is time to put Indian politics in the context of general debates on the meaning and conditions of development. The conceptual vocabulary of development studies is profoundly rooted in the historical encounter between the European and the non-European. Is tradition necessarily an obstacle to progress and development which must be discarded? Is modernisation necessarily all good? How much conceptual coherence is there to the term ‘Third World’? The abundance of terms to refer essentially to the same group of countries reflects continuing dissatisfactions with each: backward, developing, undeveloped, underdeveloped, less developed, Third World, low income, traditional. In these days of political correctness, perhaps we should call them ‘the economically challenged’ or ‘the industrially embarrassed’.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Further Reading
Bhagwati (1993). Argues that India’s disappointing record in generating growth stems from a distrust of growth as an instrument of poverty alleviation.
Chakravarty (1987). A good discussion of India’s planning machinery and process.
Frankel (1978b). An influential study of India’s attempt to bring about rapid economic growth and reduction in socio-economic disparities without violent social change.
Hettne (1990). An interdisciplinary survey of social science theories of development in different historical and geographical contexts.
Oldenburg (1993). The latest in an established series designed to provide reliable and timely updates on political, economic and foreign policy trends.
Palma (1978). An excellent exposition and critique of dependency and underdevelopment theories.
Roy and James (1992). A collection of papers by well-known India specialists on the politics and economics of the country, mainly in the 1980s.
Somjee (1991). An attempt to ground development theory in the experiences of ‘emerging countries’.
Stern (1993). Argues that India’s institutions are undergoing rapid and profound changes that are adaptive to the continuity and vitality of the underlying social system rather than disruptive of them.
Tomlinson (1993). Examines the debates over imperialism, development and underdevelopment, and sets them in the context of historical change in agriculture, trade and manufacture, and the relations between business, the economy and the state.
Copyright information
© 1995 Ramesh Thakur
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Thakur, R. (1995). Development Theories and India’s Record. In: The Government and Politics of India. Comparative Government and Politics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24100-2_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24100-2_11
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-59188-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24100-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave Political & Intern. Studies CollectionPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)