Skip to main content

Democracy, Authoritarianism and Development in China

  • Chapter
Democracy and Development

Part of the book series: International Economic Association Series ((IEA))

  • 293 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of democracy does not have roots in traditional Chinese thought. Quite the contrary, much of the long Chinese political tradition is authoritarian and bureaucratic in nature. State Confucianism strove to achieve a moral consensus for society based on an official orthodoxy accepted by all. Even when modem ideas about democracy came to China in the early part of this century, they tended, as Whyte (1992, p. 60) shows, to stress the benefit to the state of having popular support and not the legitimacy of pluralism, the competition of ideas or the notion of proper and reasonable interests of individuals. Nathan (1985) describes democracy as presented ‘as an ornament of modernity and an asset for rulers’. These traditions and emphases have found resonance in the treatment of ideas about democracy in the People’s Republic.

I am grateful to Lin Chun and Michio Morishima for valuable comments on an earlier version of this paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Amnesty International (1991) China: Punishment Without Crime: Administrative Detention (New York: Amnesty International).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, T. B. (1993) ‘Democratization in China: A Difficult Case’, in Morley, J. W. (ed.), Driven by Growth: Political Changes in the Asia-Pacific Region (New York: M.E. Sharpe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. (1992) ‘The Coming Battles Over Free Speech’, The New York Review of Books, 11 June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glassman, R. M. (1991) China in Transition (New York: Praeger).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A. R. et al. (1992) ‘Household Income and Its Distribution in China’, The China Quarterly, vol. 132 (December).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mao Zedong (1977) A Critique of Soviet Economics, ed. and trans. Moss Roberts (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisner, M. (1982) Marxism, Maoism, and Utopianism (Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisner, M. (1986) Mao’s China and After (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B. (1966) Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, E. T. (1992) ‘Marriage and Social Stratification in a Yangzi Delta Farming Community, 1930–1990’, unpublished paper, Modem China Seminar, Columbia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, A. J. (1985) Chinese Democracy (New York: Alfred A. Knopf).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathan, A. J. (1990) China’s Crisis: Dilemmas of Reform and Prospects for Democracy (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. (1993) Growing Out of the Plan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrasen, M. and Xiang, M. (1990) ‘The Concept of Chinese Neo-Authoritarianism: An Exploration and a Democractic Critique’, Asian Survey, vol. 33, no. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, C. (1987) China’s Political Economy: The Quest for Development Since 1949 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Riskin, C. (1990) ‘Feeding China: The Experience Since 1949’, in Drèze, J. and Sen, A. (eds) Hunger: Economics and Policy (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sautman, B. (1992) ‘Sirens of the Strongman: Neo-Authoritarianism in Recent Chinese Political Theory’, The China Quarterly, no. 129 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurmann, F. (1968) Ideology and Organization in Communist China (Berkeley, Ca.: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Selden, M. (1979) The People’s Republic of China: A Documentary History of Revolutionary Change (New York: Monthly Review Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Seiden, M. (1992) The Political Economy of Chinese Development (New York: M.E. Sharpe).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1982) ‘How is India Doing?’, New York Review of Books, vol. xxix, no. 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skocpol, T. (1979) States and Social Revolutions (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • So, A. Y. and Hua, S. (1992) ‘Democracy as an Antisystemic Movement in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China: A World Systems Analysis’, unpublished paper, University of Hawaii, Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M. K. (1992) ‘Prospects for Democratization in China’, Problems of Communism, May–June.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1990) World Development Report, 1990 (Washington: The World Bank).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Riskin, C., Morishima, M. (1995). Democracy, Authoritarianism and Development in China. In: Bagchi, A.K. (eds) Democracy and Development. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24076-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics