Skip to main content

Political Regimes and Economic Growth

  • Chapter
Democracy and Development

Abstract

Arguments that relate regimes to growth focus on property rights, pressures for immediate consumption, and the autonomy of dictators. While everyone seems to agree that secure property rights foster growth, it is controversial whether democracies or dictatorships better secure these rights. The main mechanism by which democracy is thought to hinder growth is pressure for immediate consumption, which reduces investment. Only states that are institutionally insulated from such pressures can resist them, and democratic states are not. The main argument against dictatorships is that authoritarian rulers have no interest in maximizing total output. These views are summarized in turn.

This work, first published in the Journal of Economic Perspectives (1993), vol. 7, no. 3, was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation NO. SES-9022605. Fernando Limongi was supported by a Fellowship from the CNPq. We appreciate the comments by Mike Alvarez, Pranab Bardhan, José Antonio Cheibub, Zhiyuan Cui, Jon Elster, Jeong-Hwa Lee, Bernard Manin, Joseph Stiglitz, Susan Stokes, Timothy Taylor and Michael Wallerstein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Adelman, I. and Morris, C. (1967) Society, Politics and Economic Development (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and Rodrik, D. (1991) ‘Distributive Politics and Economic Growth’, National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper no. 3668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amemiya, T. (1985) Advanced Econometrics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Amsden, A. H. (1989) Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialization (New York: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Arat, F. (1988) ‘Democracy and Economic Development: Modernization Theory Revisited’, Comparative Politics, vol. 21, no. 1 (October) pp. 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1988) ‘Comment on Gustav Ranis’ and John C. H. Fei’s “Development Economics: What Next?”’, in Ranis, G. and Schultz, T. P. (eds), The State of Development Economics: Progress and Perspectives (Oxford: Basil Blackwell) pp. 137–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, P. (1990) ‘Symposium on the State and Economic Development’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 4, pp. 39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1989) ‘A Cross-country Study of Growth, Saving, and Government’, NBER working paper no. 2855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1990) ‘Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. S103–S125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro, R. J. (1991) ‘Economic Growth in a Cross Section of Countries’, Quarterly Journal of Economics: October, pp. 407–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. S. (1983) ‘A Theory of Competition Among Pressure Groups for Political Influence’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, August, pp. 371–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, K. A. and Jackman, R. W. (1985) ‘Economic and Noneconomic Determinants of Political Democracy in the 1960s’, Research in Political Sociology, no. 1, pp. 27–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheibub, J. A. (1992) ‘Measuring Tax Effort: A Preliminary Report’, University of Chicago, Department of Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collini, S., Winch, D. and Burrow, J. (1983) That Noble Science of Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, M. W. (1977) ‘On the Structure and Stability of Political Markets’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 85, pp. 829–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui, Z. (1992) ‘Incomplete Markets and Constitutional Democracy’, University of Chicago, (manuscript).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutright, P. (1963) ‘National Political Development: Measurement and Analysis’, American Sociological Review, no. 28, pp. 253–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W. G. (1974) ‘Authoritarian versus Non-authoritarian Approaches to Economic Development’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 82, pp. 817–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore, R. (1978) ‘Scholars and Preachers’, IDS Bulletin, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy (New York: Harper & Row).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1979) Ulysses and the Sirens: Studies in Rationality and Irrationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1989) Solomonic Judgements: Studies in the Limitations of Rationality (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. and Moene, K. O. (1989) ‘Introduction’, Alternatives to Capitalism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) pp. 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. B. (1989) ‘Predatory, Developmental, and Other Apparatuses: A Comparative Political Economy Perspective on the Third World State’, Sociological Forum no. 4, pp. 561–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez, R. and Rodrick, D. (1991) ‘Resistance to Reform: Status Quo Bias in the Presence of Individual-Specific Uncertainty’, American Economic Review, vol. 81, no. 5 (December) pp. 146–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, R. (1990) ‘The New Political Economy: Its Explanatory Power for the LDCs’, Economics and Politics, vol. 2, pp. 193–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galenson, W. (1959) ‘Introduction’ to Galenson, W. (ed.), Labor and Economic Development (New York: Wiley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Galenson, W. and Leibenstein, H. (1955) ‘Investment Criteria, Productivity and Economic Development’, Quarterly Journal of Economics vol. 69, pp. 343–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G. and Wyman, D. L. (eds) (1990) Manufacturing Miracles. Paths of Industrialization in Latin America and East Asia (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, W. H. (1990) Econometric Analysis (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grier, K. B. and Tullock, G. (1989) ‘An Empirical Analysis of Cross-national Economic Growth, 1951–80’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 24, no. 2; pp. 259–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, S. (1990) Pathways From Periphery. The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannan, M. T. and Carroll, G. R. (1981) ‘Dynamics of Formal Political Structure: An Event-History Analysis’, American Sociological Review, vol. 46, no. 1 (February) pp. 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1978) ‘Dummy Endogenous Variables in a Simultaneous Equation System’, Econometrica, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 931–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckman, J. J. (1990) ‘Selection Bias and Self-selection’, in The New Palgrave. Econometrics, Eatwell, J., Milgate, M. and Newman, P. (eds) (New York: W. W. Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F. (1992) ‘Empirical Linkages between Democracy and Economic Growth’, NBER working paper no. 4066 (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1968) Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven: Yale University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. and Dominguez, J. I. (1975) ‘Political Development’, in Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds), Handbook of Political Science vol. 3 (Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaldor, N. (1955-6) ‘Alternative Theories of Distribution’, Review of Economic Studies, no. 23, pp. 94–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohli, A. (1986) ‘Democracy and Development’ in Lewis, J. P. and Kallab, V. (eds), Development Strategies Reconsidered (New Brunwick: Transaction Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kormendi, R. C. and Meguire, P. G. (1985) ‘Macroeconomic Determinants of Growth’, Journal of Monetary Economics, vol. 16, pp. 141–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landau, D. (1986) ‘Government and Economic Growth in the Less Developed Countries: An Empirical Study for 1960–1980’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 35, pp. 35–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. F. (1978) ‘Unionism and Wage Rates: A Simultaneous Equations Model with Qualitative and Limited Dependent Variables’, International Economic Review, vol. 19, pp. 415–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, R. and Renelt, D. (1991) ‘A Sensitivity Analysis of Cross-country Growth Regressions’, World Bank Working Paper, WPS 609.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindauer, D. L. and Velenchik, A. D. (1992) ‘Government Spending in Developing Countries. Trends, Causes, and Consequences’, The World Bank Research Observer, no. 7, pp. 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipset, S. M. (1960) Political Man (Garden City, New York: Doubleday).

    Google Scholar 

  • Macaulay, T. B. (1900) Complete Writings 17 (Boston, Mass.: Houghton-Mifflin) p. 263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G. S. (1983) Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. M. (1979) ‘Does Democracy Hinder Economic Development in the Latecomer Developing Nations?’, Comparative Social Research, vol. 2, pp. 215–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, R. M. (1988) ‘Sociological Explanations of Economic Growth’, Studies in Comparative International Research, vol. 13, pp. 41–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1934) The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte (Moscow: Progress Publishers) p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1952) The Class Struggle in France, 1848 to 1850 (Moscow: Progress Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1971) Writings on the Paris Commune, Draper, H. (ed.) (New York: International Publishers) p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neubauer, D. E. (1967) ‘Some Conditions of Democracy’, American Political Science Review, vol. 61, pp. 1002–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. (1990) Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. and Thomas, R. P. (1973) The Rise of the Western World: A New Economic History (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • North, D. C. and Weingast, B. R. (1989) ‘Constitutions and Commitment: The Evolution of Institutions Governing Public Choice in Seventeenth-Century England’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 49, pp. 803–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Donnell, G. (1973) Modernization and Bureaucratic-Authoritarianism (Berkeley, Ca.: University of California).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Flaherty, B. (1990) ‘Why Are There Democracies? A Principal Agent Answer’, Economics and Politics, no. 2, pp. 133–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1963) ‘Rapid Growth as a Destabilizing Force’, Journal of Economic History, vol. 23, pp. 529–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1991) ‘Autocracy, Democracy and Prosperity’, in Zeckhauser, R. J. (ed.), Strategy and Choice (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press) pp. 131–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, L. (1961–2) ‘Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, pp. 267–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, T. and Tabellini, G. (1991) ‘Is Inequality Harmful for Growth? Theory and Evidence’, working paper no. 91, pp. 155, Department of Economics, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pourgerami, A. (1988) ‘The political Economy of Development: A Cross-national Causality Test of Development-Democracy-Growth Hypothesis’, Public Choice, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 123–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pourgerami, A. (1991) ‘The Political Economy of Development. An Empirical Investigation of the Wealth Theory of Democracy’, Journal of Theoretical Politics vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 189–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1966) ‘Party Systems and Economic Development’, Northwestern University, Ph.D. Dissertation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. (1990) ‘The State and the Economy under Capitalism’, Fundamentals of Pure and Applied Economics, vol. 40 (Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers).

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and Limongi, F. (1992) ‘Selection, Counterfactuals and Comparisons’, University of Chicago, manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski, A. and Wallerstein, M. (1988) ‘Structural Dependence of the State on Capital’, American Political Science Review vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 11–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, R. (1986) ‘Government Size and Economic Growth: A New Framework and Some Evidence from Cross-Section and Time-Series Data’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. (1984) ‘Democracry and Economic Development’, Studies in Comparative International Development, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 67–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remmer, K. (1990) ‘Democracy and Economic Crisis: The Latin American Experience’, World Politics vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 315–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, L. G. (1983) ‘The Spread of Economic Growth to the Third World’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 941–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (1992) ‘Political Economy and Development Policy’, European Economic Review, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. (1992) ‘Increasing Returns and New Developments in the Theory of Growth’, in Barnett, W. A. (ed.) Equilibrium Theory and Applications (New York: Cambridge University Press) pp. 83–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sah, R. K. (1991) ‘Fallibility in Human Organizations and Political Systems’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 67–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schepsle, K. (1989) ‘Studying Institutions: Some Lessons from the Rational Choice Approach’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, vol. 1, no. 2 (April) pp. 131–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinitz, K. de, Jr. (1959) ‘Industrialization, Labor Controls and Democracy’, Economic Development and Cultural Change, vol. 7, pp. 385–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweinitz, K. de, Jr. (1964) Industrialization and Democracy (New York: Free Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G. W. (1988) The Institutional Framework and Economic Development’, Journal of Political Economy vol. 96, pp. 652–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scully, G. W. (1992) Constitutional Environments and Economic Growth (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, J. and Tedin, K. L. (1987) ‘The Consequences of Regimes Type for Public-Policy Outputs’, Comparative Political Studies, vol. 20, no. 1 (April) pp. 98–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. K., Jr. (1969) ‘Socio-economic Development and Political Democracy: A Causal Analysis’, Midwest Journal of Political Science, no. 13, pp. 95–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soares, G. A. D. (1987) ‘Desenvolvimento Economico e Democracia en America Latina’ (Economic and Democratic Development in Latin America), Dados, no. 30, pp. 253–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolzenberg, R. M. and Relies, D. A. (1990) ‘Theory Testing in a World of Constrained Research Design’, Sociological Methods and Research vol. 18, no. 4 (May) pp. 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (1990) Governing the Market, Economic Theory and the Role of Government in East Asian industrialization (Princeton: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weede, E. (1983) ‘The Impact of Democracy on Economic Growth: Some Evidence from Cross-National Analysis’, Kyklos vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 21–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westphal, L. E. (1990) ‘Industrial Policy in an Export-Propelled Economy: Lessons from South Korea’s Experience’, Journal of Economic Perspectives vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 41–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittman, D. (1989) ‘Why Democracies Produce Efficient Results’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 97, no. 6, pp. 1395–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (1987) World Development Report (Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 International Economic Association

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Przeworski, A., Limongi, F., Giner, S. (1995). Political Regimes and Economic Growth. In: Bagchi, A.K. (eds) Democracy and Development. International Economic Association Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24076-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics