Skip to main content

The British Military View of European Security, 1945–50

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: S. Antony’s/Macmillan Series ((STANTS))

Abstract

From the mid-1950s to the end of the cold war, Britain’s ‘Atlanticist’ approach to Western European security revolved around three assumptions.1 The first was that the political and military involvement of the USA should be nurtured. Second, there was the acceptance of nuclear weapons in operational planning, for defence and deterrence. The final assumption was that the defence of Western Europe should be a matter for the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation (NATO). Along with the USA, West Germany and other allies, Britain committed conventional troops and air forces to NATO’s European command, to be stationed permanently in Germany. Britain’s faith in the Atlanticist approach has been tenacious.2

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. The 1990 ‘Options for Change’ defence review, Britain’s reaction to the events of 1989 and the changing requirements of European security, revealed the strength of this conviction: L. Scott, ‘British perspectives on the future of European security’, in C. McInnes (ed.), Security and Strategy in the New Europe (London, 1992), p. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. Greenwood, ‘Defence and National Priorities Since 1945’, in J. Baylis (ed.), British Defence Policy in a Changing World (London, 1977), p. 187.

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. B. Brett, 2nd Viscount Esher, chairman, War Office Reconstruction Committee 1903–4. Quoted in M. Howard, The Continental Commitment (London, 1972), p. 49.

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Dockrill, ‘The Evolution of Britain’s Policy Towards a European Army’, Journal of Strategic Studies, vol. 12, no. 1 (March 1989), p. 57 (note 103).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. A. DeWeerd, ‘Britain’s Changing Military Policy’, Foreign Affairs, vol. 34, no. 1 (October 1955), p. 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Barnett, Britain and Her Army 1509–1970 (London, 1970), p. 482.

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Baylis, The Diplomacy of Pragmatism: Britain and the Formation of NATO, 1942–1949 (London, 1993), p. 128.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. See F. A. Johnson, Defence by Ministry (London, 1980), ch. 2;

    Google Scholar 

  9. M. Edmonds, ‘The Higher Organisation of Defence in Britain’, in M. Edmonds (ed.), The Defence Equation — British Military Systems; Policy, Planning and Performance Since 1945 (London, 1986), ch. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  10. E. Broadbent, The Military and Government From Macmillan to Heseltine (London, 1988), p. 112.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. L. Freedman, U.S. Intelligence and the Soviet Strategic Threat (London, 1986), p. 4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. A. Bitzinger, Assessing the Conventional Balance in Europe, 1945–1975 (Santa Monica, 1989), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. PRO: DO (47) 44, May 1947, reproduced in J. Lewis, Changing Direction: British Military Planning for Post-war Strategic Defence, 1942–1947 (London, 1988), appendix 7.

    Google Scholar 

  14. PRO: DO (50) 45, 7 June 1950; H. J. Yasamee and K. A. Hamilton, Documents on British Policy Overseas, Series II, Volume IV: Korea, June 1950-April 1951 [henceforth, DBPO] (London, 1991), pp. 411ff.

    Google Scholar 

  15. R. J. Aldrich and J. Zametica, ‘The rise and decline of a strategic concept: the Middle East, 1945–51’, in R. J. Aldrich (ed.), British Intelligence, Strategy and the Cold War, 1945–51, (London, 1992), pp. 264.

    Google Scholar 

  16. S. Dockrill has described Montgomery as ‘a lone voice in advocating in February 1948 that Britain should send two divisions to the Continent to encourage the morale of her European friends’: Britain’s Policy for West German Rearmament, 1950–1955 (Cambridge, 1991), p. 8.

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. Hamilton sees these events and arguments in late January/early February 1948 as the beginning of ‘Monty’s struggle to make Western Union and the Atlantic Pact a military reality’: Monty: The Field-Marshal 1944–1976 (London, 1986), p. 699. Kent and Young have also described Montgomery as ‘the one British military figure who was genuinely interested in continental cooperation’, although they point out that he was wary of allowing his enthusiasm for Europe to lead him into making any promises of committing British troops to the Continent: ‘The “Western Union” concept and British defence policy, 1947–8’, in Aldrich (ed.), British Intelligence, pp. 174–5.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Barker, The British Between the Superpowers, 1945–50 (London, 1983), p. 197.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cornish, P. (1995). The British Military View of European Security, 1945–50. In: Deighton, A. (eds) Building Postwar Europe. S. Antony’s/Macmillan Series. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24052-4_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24052-4_5

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-24054-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-24052-4

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics