Skip to main content

Accountability and Effectiveness in Community Care

  • Chapter
  • 74 Accesses

Abstract

Community care raises a number of issues about accountability. In this chapter, we shall look at the ways in which post-Griffiths policy tries to deal with these accountability issues, and the consequences for practice. For practitioners, the policy creates multiple and possibly conflicting responsibilities. It seeks to enforce financial limitations and government management philosophies in a context where responsibility to service users’ and carers’ choice is also being promoted. Workers will feel a responsibility to both sides, and their demands are often in tension. Care management places a responsibility to assess needs and treat these as a priority, while imposing financial limitations on meeting those assessed needs. Different services and professions are also making their own assessments and conflicts between those assessments will have to be worked out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Jo Campling

Copyright information

© 1995 Malcolm Payne

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Payne, M. (1995). Accountability and Effectiveness in Community Care. In: Campling, J. (eds) Social Work and Community Care. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24013-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics