Skip to main content

How Important is it to Defeat Inflation? The Evidence

  • Chapter
Essential Readings in Economics
  • 1244 Accesses

Abstract

We all know that the fundamental aim of Mrs Thatcher’s Government is to defeat inflation. The importance of this aim has been reiterated time and again by Government spokesmen, and was recently reaffirmed at the Conservative Party Conference in October. Moreover, it is clear that the pursuit of this end subordinates all others, including not only the traditional policy objective of ‘full’ employment, but also the particularly Conservative objective of reducing taxation. The overwhelming importance accredited to this aim derives from the belief that persistent inflation has lain at the root of Britain’s economic malaise, and that its defeat is a prerequisite for the achievement and maintenance of higher rates of real economic growth. Yet although the debate has raged about how best to defeat inflation, the basic premise has gone largely unchallenged.2 Why should the defeat of inflation be so important? What is wrong with inflation anyway?

The Three Banks’ Review (1981), pp. 23–47.

The author gratefully acknowledges comments on an earlier draft of the paper from the editors of this review, and also from Michael Jankowski, Stephen Lofthouse, John McGregor, Professor Brian Reddaway and Tim Sweet. The article nevertheless, expresses a personal view and neither they, nor Capel-Cure Myers, are necessarily in agreement with it. The responsibility for any errors or omissions rests with the author.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bailey, M. J. L. (1956) ‘The Welfare Cost of Inflationary Finance’, Journal of Political Economy, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootle, R. P. (1975), ‘The Role of Trade Unions in the Inflationary Process’, unpublished M. Phil thesis, Nuffield College, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootle, R. P. (1981a), ‘So why is inflation supposed to be so harmful anyway?’. The Guardian, August 26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootle, R. P. (1981b), ‘British Government Inaction over the Exchange Rate’, The World Economy, September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bootle, R. P. (1981c), ‘Mrs Thatcher promised more than just monetarism’, The Daily Telegraph, October 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bresciani-Turroni, C. (1937), The Economics of Inflation’, in A Study of Currency Depreciation in Post-War Germany (London: George Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brittan, L. (1981), Speech during the Third Reading of the Finance Bill on 20 July, reported in Hansard, volume 9, No. 145.

    Google Scholar 

  • CBI (1981), Economic Situation Report, end July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldstein, M. (1979), ‘The Welfare cost of Permanent Inflation and Optional Short-Run Economic Policy’, Journal of Political Economy, August.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1969), The Optimum Quantity of Money (Chicago: Aldine Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1977), Inflation and Unemployment: The New Dimension of Politics, Institute of Economic Affairs Occasional Paper 51 (London: IEA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, R. J. (1971), ‘Steady Anticipated Inflation: Mirage or Oasis’, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity, no. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, F. D. (1930), Exchange, Prices and Production in Hyper-Inflation: Germany, 1920–1923 (Princeton, N: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, J. R. (1974), ‘Wages and Inflation’, in The Crisis in Keynesian Economics (Oxford: Basil Blackwell).

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham, D. S. (1981), ‘Strong currencies and economic performance: lessons from Germany, Japan and Switzerland’, The Three Banks’ Review, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee, D. and Kleiman, E. (1977), The Welfare Implications of Uneven Inflation’, in E. Lundberg (ed.) Inflation Theory and Anti-Inflation Policy (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Laidler, D. (1977), ‘The Welfare Costs of Inflation in Neo-Classical Theory’, in E. Lundberg (ed.), Inflation Theory and Anti-Inflation Policy (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, I. M. D. (1957), A Critique of Welfare Economics (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Logue, D. and Willett, T. (1976), ‘A Note on the Relation Between the Rate and Variability of Inflation’, Economica, May.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford, A. P. L. and Hilliard, G. W. (1978), ‘The Costs of Variable Inflation’, in M. J. Artis and A. R. Nobay (eds), Contemporary Economic Analysis (London: Croom Helm).

    Google Scholar 

  • Minford, A. P. L. (1981), ‘A dangerous and dishonest game’, The Times, April 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newlyn, W. T. and Bootle, R. P. (1978), Theory of Money (3rd edn, Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1978), Economic Survey, Switzerland (Paris: OECD).

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1971), ‘The Mirage of Steady Inflation’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. M. (1975), ‘Inflation: Its Mechanics and Welfare Costs’, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, No. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. W. (1958), The Relation Between the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates and the Level of Unemployment in the United Kingdom, 1861–1957’, Economica, November.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Macmillan Publishers Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bootle, R. (1995). How Important is it to Defeat Inflation? The Evidence. In: Estrin, S., Marin, A. (eds) Essential Readings in Economics. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-24002-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics