Advertisement

Environmental Policy and Strategic International Trade

  • Alistair Ulph
Part of the Confederation of European Economic Associations book series (CEEA)

Abstract

Policy-makers frequently express concern about the possible impact of environmental policy in raising production costs and lowering international competitiveness, yet empirical studies suggest that such effects are small. However, these findings are from models in which international trade is modelled as being perfectly competitive. In earlier theoretical work I have shown that if trade is modelled as imperfectly competitive with scope for strategic behaviour by producers, then the choice of environmental policy instrument can have a marked impact on the incentives for producers to act strategically, with environmental standards reducing significantly the incentives for strategic overinvestment relative to environmental taxes, or no environmental policy at all. In this paper I present a simulation model which is based on the earlier theoretical work to try to assess how significant these arguments might be in practice. The parameters of the model are calibrated on data for the world fertiliser industry, though the model does not pretend to be a realistic description of that industry. These empirical results show that the impact of environmental policy on strategic behaviour can be at least as important as the more usual impact of environmental policy operating through induced changes in costs of production above.

Keywords

Market Share Environmental Policy Policy Instrument Consumer Surplus Welfare Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barrett, S. (1992), ‘Environmental Policy and Strategic International Trade’, mimeo, London Business School.Google Scholar
  2. Boero, G., R. Clarke, and A. Winters (1991), The Macroeconomic Consequences of Controlling Greenhouse Gases: A Survey, Department of the Environment, Environmental Economics Research Series (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  3. British Sulphur Corporation (1986), Fertiliser Products 1985–6, London.Google Scholar
  4. Burrell, A. (1989), ‘The Demand for Fertiliser in the United Kingdom’, Journal of Agricultural Economics, 40, pp. 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burniaux, J.-M., J. Martin, G. Nicoletti, and J. Martins (1992), ‘The Costs of Reducing CO2 Emissions: Evidence from GREEN’, OECD Economics Department Working Paper 115 (Paris: OECD).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cline, W. R. (1992), The Greenhouse Effect: Global Economic Consequences (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics).Google Scholar
  7. Fertiliser Manual (1980) London: Fertiliser Manufacturers Association).Google Scholar
  8. Helpman, E. and P. Krugman (1989), Trade Policy and Market Structure (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press).Google Scholar
  9. Hoeller, P., A. Dean, and J. Nicolaisen (1991) ‘Macroeconomic Implications of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: a Survey of Empirical Studies’, OECD Economic Studies, 16, pp. 45–78.Google Scholar
  10. Horton, G. J. Rollo and A. Ulph (1992), Links Between Environmental and International Trade Policies, Department of the Environment Working Paper (London: HMSO).Google Scholar
  11. Krugman, P. (1991), ‘Increasing Returns and Economic Geography’, Journal of Political Economy, 99, pp. 483–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Perroni, C. and T. Rutherford (1991), ‘International Trade in Carbon Emission Rights and Basic Materials: General Equilibrium Calculations for 2020’, mimeo, University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  13. Pezzey, J. (1991), ‘Analysis of Unilateral Carbon Taxes Using the Whalley-Wigle Global Energy Model’, mimeo, University of Bristol.Google Scholar
  14. Rauscher, M. (1992), ‘On Ecological Dumping’, mimeo, University of Kiel.Google Scholar
  15. Ulph, A. (1992), ‘The Choice of Environmental Policy Instruments and Strategic International Trade’, in R. Pethig (ed.) Conflicts and Cooperation in Managing Environmental Resources, (Springer-Verlag), Berlin. pp. 111–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ulph, A. (1993a), ‘Environmental Policy and Strategic International Trade’, Discussion Paper 9304, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  17. Ulph, A. (1993b), ‘Environmental Policy When Governments and Producers Act Strategically’, mimeo, University of Southampton.Google Scholar
  18. Ulph, A. (1994) ‘Environmental Policy, Plant Location and Government Protection’, in C. Carraro (ed.), Trade, Innovation, Environment (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers) pp. 123–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Whalley, J. and Wigle, R. (1991), ‘Cutting CO2 Emissions: the Effects of Alternative Policy Approaches’, The Energy Journal, 12, pp. 109–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

  1. Ulph A. (1993a), ‘Environmental Policy and Strategic International Trade’. University of Southampton Discussion Paper 9304.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Confederation of European Economic Associations 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alistair Ulph

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations