Skip to main content

Biases in Global Markets: Can the Forces of Inequity and Marginalisation be Modified?

  • Chapter
The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions
  • 44 Accesses

Abstract

Marketisation was a universal phenomenon in the 1980s — in developed countries under the influence of monetarism and the leadership of Thatcher and Reagan, in the developing countries largely as a result of pressure from the IMF and World Bank, and in Eastern Europe, with the collapse of communism. The advance of markets was both a domestic and an international development. The progressive dominance of domestic markets arose largely as a result of conscious political decisions. While these also influenced global markets, their advance was as much the product of forces outside conscious control — including technology change and especially the communications revolution, migratory forces, and institutional developments. Domestically, marketisation meant reduced state interventions, reduced subsidisation and increased privatisation. Internationally, global markets became increasingly important while systems of regulating these markets were haphazard, biased, non-existent or in retreat.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  • Amsden, A., Asia’s Next Giant: South Korea and Late Industrialisation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltho, A., ‘Growth, income distribution and household welfare in the industrialised countries since the first oil shock’, Innocenti Occasional Papers (Florence: UNICEF, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, E. and Al. Helwege, ‘Below the line: poverty in Latin America’ World Development, 20, 1, 1992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cline, W., ‘Can the East Asian model be generalised?’, World Development, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorosh, P. and D. Sahn, ‘A general equilibrium analysis of the effect of macro-economic adjustment on poverty in Africa’ processed (Washington, DC: Cornell University Food and Nutrition Policy Program, 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • GATT, General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: What It Is Is, What It Does (Geneva: GATT, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghai, D., ‘Structural adjustment, global integration and social democracy’ in D. Prendergast and F. Stewart (eds), Market Forces and World Development (London: Macmillan 1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, A., N. Kaldor and J. Tinbergen, ‘The case for an international commodity reserve currency’, in N. Kaldor, Essays on Economic Policy, II (London: Duckworth 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S., Location of Industry and International Competitiveness (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  • IMF, World Economic Outlook (Washington, DC: IMF October 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P., ‘A model of innovation, technology transfer and the world distribution of income’, Journal of Political Economy, 87, 253–63, 1979.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lall, S., ‘Technology transfer, foreign investment and indigenous capabilities’, mimeo (Institute of Economics and Statistics, Oxford University, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, S., ‘Multinational corporations’ taste transfer and underdevelopment’ Review of African Political Economy, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oman, C., ‘Trends in global FDI and Latin America’, paper presented at the Inter-American Dialog meeting, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., ‘Adjustment, growth and debt fatigue: can the case-by-case and global approaches be combined?’, Occasional Paper (San Francisco: International Center for Economic Growth, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ranis, G., ‘A reply to Cline’, World Development, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F., ‘War and underdevelopment: can economic analysis help reduce the costs?’ Journal of International Development, 5, 4, 357–80, 1993.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, F., ‘Protecting the poor during adjustment in Latin America and the Caribbean: how adequate was the World Bank response?’, L.D’A and QEH Development Studies Working Papers (Oxford: Queen Elizabeth House, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeten, P., ‘Dynamics of the New Poor Power’ in G. K. Helleiner (ed.), A World Divided: the Less Developed Countries in the International Economy (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD, ‘Technological dependence: the nature, consequences and policy implications’, in Proceedings of the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Fourth session, Vol. III, Basic documents, TD/190, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, Human Development Report 1992 (New York: United Nations, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP, Human Development Report 1990 (New York: United Nations, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations, World Investment Report: Transnational Corporations as Engines of Growth (New York: United Nations, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R., ‘International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 53, 190–207, 1966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. Governing the Market (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. and M. McGillivray, ‘Descriptive Measures of the Allocation of Development Aid’, processed (The Hague: Institute of Social Studies, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, World Development Report 1992 (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992a).

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank, ‘Global economic prospects and the developing countries’ (Washington, DC: World Bank, 1992b).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 North South Roundtable

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Stewart, F. (1995). Biases in Global Markets: Can the Forces of Inequity and Marginalisation be Modified?. In: ul Haq, M., Jolly, R., Streeten, P., Haq, K. (eds) The UN and the Bretton Woods Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23958-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics