Abstract
The reduction in fertility accompanying modernisation poses a scientific puzzle that has yet to be solved. Despite the fact the problem has received a great deal of attention from economists, sociologists, demographers, anthropologists and biologists, no discipline in the social or biological sciences has offered a fully developed and coherent theory of fertility reduction that explains the timing and pattern of fertility reduction in the developed or developing world. The inability to offer an adequate theory raises fundamental questions about the theoretical foundations of those disciplines. For example, although economics has made great strides in explaining consumer behaviour, time allocation and labour force participation through the recognition that the household is a fundamental organisational unit of human action, there is no adequate explanation of why households are mostly composed of men and women who marry and have children. There is no economic theory of why reproductive partnerships form such a fundamental organisational principle in human societies nor of why people have and want children in the first place. The very modest progress of economists in explaining long-, medium- and short-term trends in fertility highlights this weakness.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Becker, G. S. (1975), Human Capital (New York: Columbia University Press) 2nd edition.
Becker, G. S. (1981), A Treatise on the Family (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press).
Becker, G. S. and Tomes, N. (1986), ‘Human capital and the rise and fall of families’, Journal of Labour Economics, vol. 4, pp. s1–s39.
Becker, G. S. and Barro, R. J. (1988), ‘A reformulation of the economic theory of fertility’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 103, pp. 1—25.
Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M. and Tamura, R. (1990), ‘Human capital, fertility and economic growth’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 98, pp. s12–s37.
Behrman, J. R., Pollack, R. A. and Taubman, P. (1982), ‘Parental preferences and provision for progeny’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 90, pp. 52–73.
Charnov, E. (1993), Life History Invariants: Some Explorations of Symmetry in Evolutionary Ecology (New York: Oxford University Press).
Easterlin, R. A. (1987), Birth and Fortune: The Impact of Numbers on Personal Welfare (Chicago: University of Chicago Press) 2nd Edition.
Frank, R. H. (1985), Choosing the Right Pond: Human Behaviour and the Quest for Status (New York, Oxford University Press).
Hawkes, K. (1993), ‘Why hunter-gatherer work: an ancient version of the problem of public goods’, Current Anthropology, vol. 34, pp. 341–61.
Henry, L. (1961), ‘Some data on natural fertility’, Eugenics Quarterly, vol. 8, pp. 81–91.
Hill, K. and Hurtado, A. M. (1994) Ache Life History: The Ecology and Demography of a Foraging People (Albuquerque: Department of Anthropology, University of New Mexico).
Hill, K., Kaplan, H. and Hawkes, K. (1993), ‘Why do male foragers hunt and share food?’, Current Anthropology, vol. 34, pp. 701–10.
Kaplan, H. (1994), ‘Evolutionary and wealth-flows theories of fertility: empirical tests and new models’, Population and Development Review, in press.
Kaplan, H. and Hill, K. (1985), ‘Food sharing among Ache foragers’, Current Anthropology, vol. 26, pp. 223–45.
Kaplan, H., Hill, K. and Hurtado, A.M. (1990), ‘Risk, Foraging and Food Sharing among the Ache’, in E. Cashdan (ed.), Risk and Uncertainty in Tribal and Peasant Economies (Boulder, CO: Westview Press) pp. 107–44.
Lack, D. (1968), Ecological Adaptations for Breeding in Birds (London: Methuen).
Lesthaeghe, R. and Wilson, C. (1986), ‘Modes of production, secularization, and the pace of fertility decline in western Europe, 1870–1930’, in A. J. Coale and S. C. Watkins (eds), The Decline of Fertility in Europe (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press) pp. 261–92.
Lindert, P. H. (1986), ‘Unequal English wealth since 1670’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, pp. 1127–62.
Rogers, A. R. (1990), ‘The evolutionary economics of human reproduction’, Ethology and Sociobiology, vol. 11, pp. 479–95.
Rogers, A. R. (1993), ‘Why menopause?’, Evolutionary Ecology, vol. 7, pp. 406–20.
Smith, C. C. and Fretwell, S. D. (1974), ‘The optimal balance between size and number of offspring’, American Naturalist, vol. 108, pp. 499–506.
Stearns, S. C. (1993), The Evolution of Life Histories (New York: Oxford University Press).
US Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census (1980), General Population Characteristics: New Mexico 1980 (Washington, DC: US Goverment Printing Office).
US Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration (1987), Highway Statistics 1985, TD2.22:985 (Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office).
Vining, D. R. (1986), ‘Social versus reproductive success — the central theoretical problem of human sociobiology’, Behavioural and Brain Sciences, vol. 9, pp. 167–260.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 The Galton Institute
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaplan, H.S., Lancaster, J.B., Bock, J.A., Johnson, S.E. (1995). Fertility and Fitness Among Albuquerque Men: A Competitive Labour Market Theory. In: Dunbar, R.I.M. (eds) Human Reproductive Decisions. Studies in Biology, Economy and Society. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23947-4_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23947-4_6
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23949-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23947-4
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)