Skip to main content

‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore

  • Chapter
Webster and Ford

Part of the book series: English Dramatists ((ENGDRAMA))

  • 23 Accesses

Abstract

In comparison with The Broken Heart, ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore has been less consistently praised by literary critics but has a much stronger stage history. A note at the end of the 1633 Quarto speaks of ‘the general commendation deserved by the actors in their presentment of this tragedy’ and in 1639 it was included in a list of plays belonging to the Cockpit theatre which its new manager William Beeston, son of Christopher, wished to protect from other acting companies. This was presumably a mark of its continued commercial viability and its reputation was enough to ensure it at least two revivals soon after the Restoration. The absence of any further productions until the twentieth century is attributable more to moral objections to its subject matter than to doubts about its theatrical effectiveness. The liberalisation of moral attitudes in the 1960s has resulted in a steady stream of both amateur and professional productions since 1968, including heavily adapted versions for film and television. Writing before he had the benefit of seeing many of these, the editor of the Revels edition was nevertheless confident that ‘few Jacobean tragedies outside Shakespeare stand up so well to revival’.1 The opportunity to see and compare a number of ‘subsequent performances has helped to confirm the play’s theatrical power, which now seems beyond dispute, and to clarify some unexpected strengths, such as the effectiveness of the scenes involving Bergetto and the importance of other ‘minor’ characters like Vasques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. T. S. Eliot, ‘John Ford’, in Selected Essays, 3rd edn (London: Faber, 1951) p. 198.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See Lévi-Strauss, Structural Anthropology (1958), trans. Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (London: Allen Lane, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cyrus Hoy, ‘“Ignorance in Knowledge”: Marlowe’s Faustus and Ford’s Giovanni’, Modern Philology, vol. LVII, no. 3 (February 1960) 145–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. John Donne, Biathanatos, ed. Michael Rudick and M. Pabst Battin (New York: Garland, 1982) I. i. 7, p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hugo Grotius, Of the Law of Warre and Peace (1625), trans. C. Barksdale (1655), quoted in Robert Ornstein, The Moral Vision of Jacobean Tragedy (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1960) p. 207.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Marlowe, Sestiad II, 11. 287–8, in The Poems, ed. Millar Maclure (London: Methuen, 1968).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oscar Wilde, Plays, Prose Writings and Poems (London: J. M. Dent, 1990) pp. 63–4.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Michael Neill, ‘“What Strange Riddle’s This?”: Deciphering ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore’, in John Ford: Critical Revisions, ed. Michael Neill (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988) p. 163.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1995 Rowland Wymer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wymer, R. (1995). ‘Tis Pity She’s a Whore. In: Webster and Ford. English Dramatists. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23853-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics