Skip to main content

The Legal Status of the Embryo and the Fetus

  • Chapter
  • 25 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Biology, Economy and Society ((SBES))

Abstract

Legal attitudes to fetuses and newborns have varied over time, some cultures proscribing abortion and infanticide, some early codes giving the fetus indirect protection by prohibiting the striking of a woman so as to cause the death of her unborn child (Codes). In other cultures, abortion and infanticides were seen as acceptable resolutions of dilemmas posed by scarce resources, birth defects or sexual balance. Neither ancient Greek nor early Roman law forbade abortion, the latter not regarding the unborn child as a living human being. The common law has long drawn a fundamental distinction between the fetus and the child following birth. Recent developments in common law jurisprudence have, however, seen the recognition of interests — notice the importance of that term, interests, not rights — against harm to the child before its birth.

The question of control over genetic products and the limits to be imposed creates problems in terms of both application of existing legislation and principles of law, and respect for the fundamental principles and values of our society, in particular individual freedoms and human dignity. (Council of Europe, 1989)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brazier, M. (1988) ‘Embryos’ “Rights”: Abortion and Research’, in M. Freeman (ed.), Medicine, Ethics and the Law (London: Stevens) pp. 9–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton v. Islington Health Authority [1992] 3 All ER 833.

    Google Scholar 

  • C v. S [1988] 1 QB 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Codes, of Sumerian 2000 BC, Assyrian 1500 BC, Hittite 1300 BC and Persian 600 BC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council of Europe (1989) Human Artificial Procreation, Strasbourg, The Council, 1989, p. 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis v. Davis [1989] 15 FLR 2097 (on appeal [1990] WL 130807 (Tenn CA)).

    Google Scholar 

  • de Martell v. Merton and Sutton HA [1992] 3 All ER 820 and, on appeal [1992] 3 All ER 833.

    Google Scholar 

  • DHSS (1984) Report of the Committee of Inquiry into Human Fertilisation and Embryology. Cm 9314 (London: HMSO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliot v. Joicey 1935 SC (HL) 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover, J. (1989) Fertility and the Family: The Glover Report on Reproductive Technologies to the European Commission (London: Fourth Estate) p. 94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, A. (1991) ‘The legal status of the frozen human embryo’, in A. Grubb (ed.), Challenges in Medical Care (Chichester: John Wiley) pp. 69–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailsham, Lord (1990) House of Lords, Hansard vol. 515 col. 750–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton v. Fife Health Board (1992) The Times January 28, 1992 (Outer House of the Court of Session) now under appeal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, O. W. (1881) The Common Law (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press) p. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, I. and A. Grubb (1989) Medical Law: Text and Materials (London: Butterworths) p. 682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keown, J. (1989) ‘Creative Criminals’, paper presented at ‘Assisted Conception and the Law: A Medical/Legal Forum’ Royal Society of Medicine, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana (1986) Louisiana Revised Statutes 9, ss. 121–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • LRCC (1992) Law Reform Commission of Canada, Medically Assisted Procreation, Working Paper no. 64, pp. 139–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams v. Ministry of Defence (1992) Lord Morton, Court of Session.

    Google Scholar 

  • Missouri (1986) Missouri Revised Statutes ss. 1.205(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. M. and R. G. Lee (1990) Blackstone’s Guide to the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990 (London: Blackstones) pp. 63–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, D. M. and L. Nielsen (1992) ‘Dangerous Liaisons: Law, technology and European ethics — an Anglo-Danish comparison’, in S. McVeigh and S. Wheeler (eds), Medicine, Law and Regulation (London: Dartmouth Press) pp. 64–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parpalaix v. CECOS, Trib. gr. inst. Creteil, 1 August 1984, Gaz. Pal., 1984.II.560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paton v. Trustees of the BPAS [1979] 1 QB 276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rance v. Mid Downs Health Authority [1991] 1 All ER 801.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlinson, Lord (1990) House of Lords, Hansard, 8 February 1990, col. 953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Re F (in utero) [1988] 2 All ER 193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rios [1985] ‘The Rios’ Embryo case’. See G. F. Smith (1985–6) ‘Australia’s frozen ‘orphan’ embryos: a medical, legal and ethical dilemma’, Journal of Family Law, vol. 24, pp. 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • The George and the Richard [1871] LR 3 A & E 466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt v. Rama [1972] VR 353, pp. 360–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster v. Reproductive Health Services [1989] 492 US 490.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, C. K. and D. M. Morgan (1991) ‘Whose fetus is it?’, Journal of Law and Society, vol. 18, pp. 431–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • York v. Jones [1989] 717 F Supp 42.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 The Galton Institute

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Morgan, D. (1995). The Legal Status of the Embryo and the Fetus. In: Barron, S.L., Roberts, D.F. (eds) Issues in Fetal Medicine. Studies in Biology, Economy and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23812-5_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23812-5_11

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-23814-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23812-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics