Skip to main content

What To Do About Nationalism? The Recurring Dilemma of Western Policy in East Central Europe

  • Chapter
Contemporary Nationalism in East Central Europe
  • 78 Accesses

Abstract

In the last seventy years East Central Europe has undergone fundamental political reconstruction more frequently than any other part of Europe. From the birth of the ‘successor states’ in 1918 to the emergence of the post-Warsaw-pact states after 1989, East Central Europe has been a place where ‘no peace settlement is ever final, no frontiers are secure and each generation must begin its work anew’.1 For the nations of the region, finding a secure place in Europe has been the elusive ambition of the twentieth century. For the liberal Western powers — Britain, France and the United States — manoeuvering the small and middle-sized states into the European political puzzle has been a frustrating process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes and References

  1. Jerzy Jedlicki, ‘The Revolution of 1989: The Unbearable Burden of History’, Problems of Communism, vol. xxxiv (July–August 1990), p. 40.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hubert Ripka, Eastern Europe in the Post-War World (London: Methuen, 1961), p. 31.

    Google Scholar 

  3. The verb ‘Balkanise’ means to divide (a region) into a number of smaller and often mutually hostile units, as was done in the Balkan Peninsula in the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. See J. A. Simpson and E. S. C. Weiner (eds), The Oxford English Dictionary, 2nd. ed., vol. i (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989), p. 903.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Winston S. Churchill, The Second World War: The Gathering Storm, vol. i (London: Cassell 1948), p. 9.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tony Barber, ‘Wandering into a Balkan Blunderland’, The Independent on Sunday, 30 May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Quoted from Walter Kolarz, Myths and Realities in Eastern Europe (London: Lindsay Drummond, 1946), p. 9. Regarding East Central European nationalism, see Hugh Seton-Watson, Nations and States: An Enquiry into the Origins of Nations and the Politics of Nationalism (London: Methuen, 1977), and Peter F. Sugar and Ivo J. Lederer (eds), Nationalism in Eastern Europe (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Essay on ‘Nationality’ in J. Rufus Fears (ed.), Essays in the History of Liberty: Selected Writings of Lord Acton, vol. i (Indianapolis: Liberty, 1985), p. 429.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. H. Carr makes an important distinction between the concept of self-determination that grew out of the French Revolution and the subsequent merger of this concept with doctrinaire nationalism producing the idea of ‘national self determination’. See E. H. Carr, Conditions of Peace (London: Macmillan, 1942), pp. 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  9. See Peter Alter, Nationalism (London: Edward Arnold, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thomas Garrigue Masaryk, The Making of A State: Memories and Observations 1914–1918 (New York: Frederick A. Stokes, 1927), p. 412.

    Google Scholar 

  11. David Stevenson, The First World War and international Politics (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1988), pp. 192–8.

    Google Scholar 

  12. See Piotr S. Wandycz, France and Her Eastern Allies 1919–1925 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. David Lloyd George, Memoirs of the Peace Conference (New Haven: Yale University Press), p. 200.

    Google Scholar 

  14. C. A. Macartney and A. W. Palmer, Independent Eastern Europe: A History (London: Macmillan, 1966), p. 143. See also C. A. Macartney, National States and National Minorities (London: Oxford University Press, 1934) for a detailed study of the Minority Treaties.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alfred Zimmern, The League of Nations and the Rule of Law 1918–1935 (London: Macmillan, 1936), p. 450.

    Google Scholar 

  16. ‘Protocol of the Proceedings of the Berlin Conference, Part xii — Orderly Transfer of German Populations’, in Rohan Butler (ed.), Documents on British Policy Overseas (London: HMSO, 1984), p. 1275.

    Google Scholar 

  17. See Winston S. Churchill, Closing the Ring (New York: Bantam, 1974), p. 340; W. W. Kulski, Germany and Poland: From War to Peaceful Relations (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  18. See Geir Lundsted, The American Non-Policy towards Eastern Europe (Tromso: Universitetsforlaget, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  19. The Yalta Declaration called for ‘the right of all peoples to choose the form of government under which they will live’. See Gale Stokes (ed.), From Stalinism to Pluralism: A Documentary History of Eastern Europe since 1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), p. 15.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stokes, pp. 31–2.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Article 3 of the ‘Statute of the Council of Europe’ requires each member state to ‘accept the principles of the rule of law and the enjoyment by all persons within its jurisdiction of human rights and fundamental freedoms’. See ‘Statute of the Council of Europe’, 5 May 1949, in J. A. S. Grenville, The Major-International Treaties 1914–1973: A History and Guide with Texts (New York: Stein and Day, 1975), p. 402.

    Google Scholar 

  22. George F. Kennan, Memoirs 1950–1963, vol. ii (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1972), p. 259.

    Google Scholar 

  23. ‘United States National Security Policy vis-à-vis Eastern Europe’, Hearings before the Subcommittee on International Security and Scientific Affairs of the Committee on International Relations House of Representatives, Ninety-Fourth Congress, Second Session, 12 April 1976, p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  24. See for example Zbigniew Brzezinski, The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict, 4th ed. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1971), p. 440.

    Google Scholar 

  25. See for example Dale R. Herspring and Ivan Volgyes, ‘Toward a Conceptualisation of Political Reliability in the East European Warsaw Pact Armies’, Armed Forces and Society, vol. vi (winter 1980), pp. 270–96; Daniel N. Nelson, Soviet Allies: The Warsaw Pact and the Issue of Reliability (Boulder: Westview Press, 1984); Jeffrey Simon and Trond Gilberg (eds), Security Implications of Nationalism in Eastern Europe (Carlisle Barracks: US Army War College, 1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zbigniew Brzezinski, ‘Post Communist Nationalism’ Foreign Affairs, vol. lxviii (winter 1989/90), p. 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Barber, ‘Wandering into a Balkan Blunderland’.

    Google Scholar 

  28. See: Paul Lendvai, ‘Yugoslavia without Yugoslavs: the roots of the Crisis’, International Affairs, vol. lxvii (1992), pp. 251–61.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert Fisk, ‘The Rapes Went on Day and Night’, The Independent, 8 February 1993; Patrick Moore, ‘Ethnic Cleansing in Bosnia: Outrage but Little Action’, RFE/RL Research Report, 28 august 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Quoted in Annika Savill, Davis Usborne, Anthony Bevins and Robert Block, ‘Owen Begs US to Hold its Fire in Bosnia’, The Independent, 3 May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Jonathan Eyal, ‘Peace, or Myth Wrapped in Folly?’, The Independent, 4 May 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jonathan Eyal offers a scathing critique of European policy toward the crisis in Yugoslavia in his Europe and Yugoslavia: Lessons From a Failure, Whitehall Paper Series 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  33. For the range of possible international approaches to the problem of protection of national minorities, see Stephen Kux, ‘International Approaches to the National Minorities Problem’, The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, vol. i (summer/autumn 1992), pp. 7–26. For possible solutions tailored to East Central Europe, see Jonathan Eyal, ‘Eastern Europe: What About the Minorities’, The World Today, December 1984, pp. 205–8. The problems in devising a new system of protection for national minorities can be seen in the Council of Europe’s attempts to adapt its statute to the problems in Eastern Europe. See Andrew Marshall, ‘Britain Obstructs Action on Minority Rights’, The Independent, 13 July 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kux, pp. 18–22. For a detailed review of CSCE and human rights, see Jerzy Menkes and Alina Prystrom, ‘Institutionalisation of Human Rights Protection within the CSCE System’, The Polish Quarterly of International Affairs, vol. i (summer/autumn 1992), pp. 27–46.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Joseph B. Schechtman, Postwar Population Transfers in Europe 1945–1955 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvannia Press, 1962), pp. 22–3.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Brzezinski, ‘Post-Communist Nationalism’, p. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Alter, pp. 50–4.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Paul Latawski

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Latawski, P. (1995). What To Do About Nationalism? The Recurring Dilemma of Western Policy in East Central Europe. In: Latawski, P. (eds) Contemporary Nationalism in East Central Europe. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23809-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics