Abstract
This chapter concerns China’s relationship to the outside world in the period of the Han dynasty, 206 bc to 220 ad, glancing at the pre-imperial past of the Chou and the Shang and the post-imperial future of the San-kuo and the Chin. Its argument is that though Han China shared in the common foundations of civilized humanity laid down in the early Pleistocene epoch and extended in the Neolithic, it built on them in such an original fashion and with such little contact with other centres of civilization as to constitute a world apart in a planet of separate worlds. Teilhard de Chardin saw history as spindle-shaped:1 original unity, a southern hemisphere of divergence, an equator of transition, a northern hemisphere of convergence, ultimate unity. Our story begins at the moment of maximum divergence.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Notes
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Man’s Place in Nature (Collins Fontana Books, London 1973) p. 116.
Werner Benndorf, Das Mittelmeerbuch, quoted in Fernand Braudel, La Mediterranéen et Le Monde mediterranéen à l’époque de Philippe II (Librairie Armand Colin, Paris 1949) p. 187.
For this paragraph, see Fernand Braudel, Capitalism and Material Life 1400–1800 (Collins, Fontana Books, London 1974).
Ferdinand von Richthofen, Baron Richtehofen’s Letters, 1870–1872 (North China Herald Office, Shanghai 1903) p. 125.
Karl A. Wittfogel, Oriental Despotism, A Comparative Study of Total Power (Yale University Press, New Haven 1957).
Ho Ping-ti, ‘The Loess and the Origins of Chinese Agriculture’, American Historical Review vol. LXXV, no.1 (October 1969) pp. 1–36.
K. Baer, ‘Land and Water in Ancient Egypt’, paper presented to 28th International Congress of Orientalists, Canberra, 1971.
C.S. Lewis, The Pilgrim’s Regress (Geoffrey Bles, London 1947) p. 154.
Quoted in Isaiah Berlin, Vico and Herder, Two Studies in the History of Ideas (The Hogarth Press, London 1976) pp. 139.
Joseph Needham, Science and Civilisation in China Vol. I (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1954) pp. 30, 36.
Pierre Teilhard de Chardin, Letters from a Traveller (Collins Fontana Books, London 1967) p. 57.
For European and Chinese options in housing, see Pierre Chaunu, ‘Le Bâtiment dans L’Économie Traditionnelle’, in J-P Bardet, P. Chaunu, G. Désert, P. Gouhier and H. Neveux, Le Bâtiment: Enquete D’Histoire Économique XIV e — XIX e Siècles (Mouton, Paris and The Hague 1971) pp. 9–32; and Needham, op. cit. Vol. IV, part three, pp. 60–80.
F. Alvarez Semedo, The History of That Great and Renowned Monarchy of China (John Crook, London 1655) p. 3;
Jan Nieuhof, ‘An Appendix or special Remarks taken at large out of Athanasius Kircher his Antiquities of China’, An Embassy from the East India Company of the United Provinces to the Grand Tartar Cham Emperor of China (John Ogilby, London 1669) p. 99;
John Francis Gemelli Careri, A Voyage Round the World, A Collection of Voyages and Travels in Six Volumes, Vol. IV (London 1745) p. 288;
Melchisedec Thevenot, ‘Desciption Geographique de L’Empire de la Chine par Le Pêre Martin Martinius’, Relations de Divers Voyages Curieux, Tome second, (Paris 1696) p. 8.
For modern interpretations of the fall of the Roman empire, see Peter Brown, The World of Late Antiquity from Marcus Aurelius to Muhammed (Thames and Hudson, London 1971);.
and Richard W. Bulliet, The Camel and the Wheel (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1975).
For the fall of the Han, see Yang Lien-sheng, ‘Great Families of Eastern Han’, in E-tu Zen Sun and John de Francis (eds) Chinese Social History (American Council of Learned Societies, Washington 1956) pp. 103–34;
and Etienne Balazs, Chinese Civilization and Bureaucracy (Yale University Press, New Haven and London 1964) especially chapters 12–14, pp. 173–254.
Sir Aurel Stein, On Ancient Central-Asian Tracks (Pantheon, New York 1964) pp. 19–20.
M.J. Finley, The Ancient Economy (Chatto and Windus, London 1973) p. 137.
For the cultural functions of the Chinese empire, see Leon E. Stover, The Cultural Ecology of Chinese Civilization (Mentor, New American Library, New York and Scarborough, Ontario 1974) pp. 189, 235.
Burton Watson, Records of the Grand Historian of China, Translated from the Shih chi of Ssu-ma Chien, Vol. II: The Age of Emperor Wu 140 to circa 100 BC (Columbia University Press, New York and London 1961) p. 329.
Peter Levi, The Light Garden of the Angel King (Collins, London 1972) pp. 132, 256.
E. Zurcher, The Buddhist Conquest of China (E.J. Brill, Leiden 1959) p. 62.
Liu Mau-tsai, Kutscha and Seine Beziehungen zu China Vom 2.JH. V. Bis Zum 6.JH. N. CHR I Band (Otto Harrassowitz, Wiesbaden 1969), p. 22.
John Watson McCrindle, The Commerce and Navigation of the Erythraean Sea (Reprint in 1973 of Editions Calcutta and London 1879, 1882) pp. 132, 136, 137.
Paul Wheatley, The Golden Khersonese (University of Malaya Press, Kuala Lumpur 1961) p. 16.
H.A. Giles, The Travels of Fa-Hsien (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1959) pp. 76, 78.
J. Innes Miller, The Spice Trade of the Roman Empire 29BC-AD 641 (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1969).
Cicero, De Re Publica, ii, 4, quoted in Dimitri Obolensky, The Byzantine Commonwealth (Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London 1971) p. 10.
For the history of horsepower, see Miklos Jankovich, They Rode into Europe (Harrap, London 1971).
Fan Yeh, quoted in C.P. Fitzgerald, China A Short Cultural History (The Cresset Press, London 1954) p. 199.
C.G. Jung, The Practice of Psychotherapy (Routledge and Kegan Paul, London 1954) pp. 200, 307. For the history of alchemy, see Needham, op.cit., Vol. V, parts two, three and four.
For Zervanism, see R.C. Zachner, Zurvan, A Zoroastrian Dilemma (Clarendon Press, Oxford 1955).
T.R.V. Murti, The Central Philosophy of Buddhism. A Study of the Madhyamika System (Allen and Unwin, London 1953)
quoted in Max Loehr, Buddhist Thought and Imagery (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1961) p. 26.
Helen Dunstan, ‘The Late Ming Epidemics: A Preliminary Survey’, Ch’ing-shih Wen-t’i, vol. III, no. 3 (November 1975) pp. 24–6.
For the significance of the Mahaprajnaparamitasastra see Etienne Lamotte, Le Traité de la Grande Vertu de Sagesse Tome III (Université de Louvain, Institut Orientaliste, Louvain 1970) pp. V—LX;
K. Venkata Ramanan, Nagarjuna’s Philosophy as Presented in the Maha-Prajnaparamita-Sastra (Harvard-Yenching Institute, Tuttle, Rutland, Vermont and Tokyo 1966);
and S.A.M. Adshead, ‘Buddhist Scholasticism and Transcendental Thomism’, The Downside Review, vol. 95, no. 321 (October 1977) pp. 297–305.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 S. A. M. Adshead
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Adshead, S.A.M. (1995). World Apart: China in Antiquity, 200 BC to 400 AD. In: China in World History. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23785-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23785-2_1
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62132-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23785-2
eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)