Ben Jonson pp 63-77 | Cite as

Matters of State

  • W. David Kay
Part of the Literary Lives book series (LL)

Abstract

So far as one can judge by the ‘Apologetical Dialogue’ to Poetaster, Jonson’s impulse after the War of the Theatres seems to have been to withdraw into scholarly seclusion. His decision to abandon comedy for tragedy and his declaration that he would be satisfied to please an audience of one, ‘so he judicious be’ (see ll. 220–6), indicate that he may already have been planning his classically-inspired tragedy of Sejanus His Fall. Yet it was apparently not until February 1603 that he was relieved of anxiety about his day-to-day support. Then John Manningham reported in his diary, on the authority of Thomas Overbury, that ‘Ben Jonson the poet now lives upon … [Robert] Townshend and scorns the world’.1 The patronage of Townshend, and later of Esmé Stuart, Lord D’Aubigny, freed him for the intensive classical study required for Sejanus and for his ‘observations upon Horace his Art of Poetry, which (with the text translated)’ he had almost completed by the time the Quarto of Sejanus was printed in August 1605.2

Keywords

Burning Assure Dine Defend Serpentine 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 6.
    See J. Z. Kronenfeld, ‘The Father Found: Consolation Achieved through Love in Ben Jonson’s “On My First Sonne”’, Studies in Philology, LXXV (1978) pp. 64–83;Google Scholar
  2. G. W. Pigman III, ‘Suppressed Grief in Jonson’s Funeral Poetry’, English Literary Renaissance, XIII (1983) pp. 203–20;Google Scholar
  3. H. W. Matalene, ‘Patriarchal Fatherhood in Ben Jonson’s Epigram 45’, in David G. Allen and Robert A. White (eds), Traditions and Innovations: Essays on British Literature of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance (Newark, Del., 1990) pp. 102–12; andGoogle Scholar
  4. Joshua Scodel, ‘Genre and Occasion in Jonson’s ‘On My First Sonne“, Studies in Philology LXXXVI (1989) pp. 235–59.Google Scholar
  5. 8.
    See Jenny Wormald, ‘James VI and I: Two Kings or One?’, History LXVIII (1983) pp. 188–209; andGoogle Scholar
  6. Maurice Lee, jun., Great Britain’s Solomon: James VI and I in His Three Kingdoms (Urbana, Ill., 1990) pp. 63–92.Google Scholar
  7. 9.
    Norman Egbert MacLure (ed.), The Letters of John Chamberlain 2 vols. (Philadelphia, 1939) vol. I, p. 192.Google Scholar
  8. 11.
    John Palmer, Ben Jonson (New York, 1934) p. 41.Google Scholar
  9. 12.
    See James D. Garrison, Dryden and the Tradition of Panegyric (Berkeley, Calif., 1975) pp. 92–3.Google Scholar
  10. 13.
    Quoted by J. E. Neale, ‘The Elizabethan Political Scene’, in Essays in Elizabethan History (London, 1958) p. 79.Google Scholar
  11. 14.
    See Maurice Lee, jun. (ed.), Dudley Carleton to John Chamberlain, 1603–1624: Jacobean Letters New Brunswick, NJ, 1972) p. 39.Google Scholar
  12. 20.
    See Lawrence Michel (ed.), The Tragedy of Philotas by Samiel Daniel (New Haven, Conn., 1949) pp. 36–66;Google Scholar
  13. F. J. Levy, ‘Hayward, Daniel and the Beginnings of Politic History in England’, Huntington Library Quarterly, L (1987) pp. 1–34; and Dutton, Mastering the Revels, pp. 119–23, 165–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 22.
    See J. H. M. Salmon, ‘Seneca and Tacitus in Jacobean England’, Journal of the History of Ideas L(1989) pp. 199–225;CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Alan T. Bradford, ‘Stuart Absolutism and the “Utility” of Tacitus’, Huntington Library Quarterly 46 (1983) pp. 127–55; andCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. David Womersley, ‘Sir Henry Savile’s Translation of Tacitus and the Political Interpretation of Elizabethan Texts’, Review of English Studies, New Series, XLII (1991) pp. 313–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 26.
    Ralegh, quoted by F. J. Levy, Tudor Historical Thought (San Marino, Calif., 1967) p. 292.Google Scholar
  18. 30.
    See Kenneth C. Schelhase, Tacitus in Renaissance Political Thought (Chicago, 1976);Google Scholar
  19. Mark Morford, ‘Tacitean Prudentia and the Doctrines of Justus Lipsius’, in T. J. Luce and A. J. Woodman (eds), Tacitus and the Tacitean Tradition (Princeton, 1993) pp. 129–51; andGoogle Scholar
  20. Ronald Mellor, Tacitus (London, 1993) pp. 87–111.Google Scholar
  21. 31.
    See Daniel C. Boughner, The Devil’s Disciple: Ben Jonson’s Debt to Machiavelli (New York, 1968) pp. 89–112.Google Scholar
  22. 35.
    See Matthew H. Wikander, “Queasy to Be Touched”: The World of Ben Jonson’s Sejanus’, Journal of English and Germanic Philology, LXXIX (1980) pp. 345–57.Google Scholar
  23. 41.
    See R. Malcolm Smuts, Court Culture and the Origins of a Royalist Tradition in Early Stuart England (Philadelphia, 1987) p. 81.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© W. David Kay 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. David Kay
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUSA

Personalised recommendations