Skip to main content

The Theory of International Politics, 1919–1969 (1972)

  • Chapter
International Theory

Abstract

By the theory of international politics we may understand the body of general propositions that may be advanced about political relations between states, or more generally about world politics.1 It includes normative propositions, stating the moral or legal considerations that are held to apply to international politics, as well as positive propositions which define or explain its actual character. It includes comprehensive theories, concerned to describe or to prescribe for international politics as a whole, but also partial theories concerned with some element of it such as war or peace, strategy or diplomacy. It includes theories about international society or the international system, which deal with the interrelatedness of the various units (states; nations; supranational, transnational, and subnational groups’ etc.) of which world politics is made up, as well as theories about the units themselves. It includes theories developed in the self-conscious attempt to emulate the methods of the natural sciences, thus rejecting whatever cannot be either logically or mathematically proved or verified by strict, empirical procedures; and it includes theories propounded without a self-denying ordinance of this kind.

The Aberysthyth Papers: International Politics 1919–1969, Brian Porter (ed.) (London: Oxford University Press), pp. 30–50.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. James Bryce, International Relations (London, 1922), pp. vii–iii.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sir Alfred Zimmern, The League of Nations and the Rule of Lam (London, 1936)

    Google Scholar 

  3. See Philip Noel-Baker, Disarmament (London, 1926)

    Google Scholar 

  4. James T. Shotwell, War and Its Renunciation as an Instrument of Policy in the Pact of Paris (New York, 1929)

    Google Scholar 

  5. David Davies, The Problem of the Twentieth Century (London, 1930).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Raymond Aron, Peace and War; A Theory of International Relations (London, 1966), p. 592.

    Google Scholar 

  7. W. T. R. Fox, The American Study of International Relations (Columbia, South Carolina, 1967), p. 82.

    Google Scholar 

  8. See Raymond Aron, Peace and War, and Stanley Hoffmann (ed.), Contemporary Theory in International Relations (Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1960) and The State of War (London, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  9. W. T. R. Fox (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of International Relations (Notre Dame, Indiana, 1959), p. ix.

    Google Scholar 

  10. See Karl W. Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication (New York, 1953)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Karl W. Deutsch (ed.), Political Community and the North Atlantic Area (Princeton, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

  12. See e.g. Bernard Brodie, Strategy in the Missile Age, (Princeton, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Henry A. Kissinger, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy (New York, 1957), The Necessity for Choice (New York, 1960), and The Troubled Partnership, New York, 1965

    Google Scholar 

  14. Albert Wohlstetter, ‘The Delicate Balance of Terror’, Foreign Affairs (January 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Herman Kahn, On Thermonuclear War (Princeton, 1960)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Klaus Knorr (ed.) NATO and American Security (Princeton, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klaus Knorr (ed.), Limited Strategic War (Princeton, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  18. For the former see Roger D. Masters, ‘World Politics as a Primitive Political System’, World Politics, 16 (4) (July 1964). For the latter see Konrad Lorenz, On Aggression (New York, 1966) and Robert Ardrey, The Territorial Imperative (New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  19. See C. A. W. Manning, The Nature of International Society (London, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lewis F. Richardson’s work of the inter-war period was virtually unknown until it was published posthumously in 1960. See Lewis F. Richardson, Arms and Insecurity: A Mathematical Study of The Causes of War, (eds.) (Nicholas Rashevsky and Ernesto Trucco, London, 1960); and Statistics of Deadly Quarrels, (eds.) (Quincy Wright and Carl C. Lienau, London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  21. H. Butterfield and M. Wight, (eds.), Diplomatic Investigations (London, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  22. I have argued this in ‘International Theory: the Case for a Classical Approach,’ in Klaus Knorr and James N. Rosenau (eds.), Contending Approaches to International Politics (Princeton, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  23. See Karl W. Deutsch, Nationalism and Social Communication; Ernst Haas, The Uniting of Europe (Stanford, 1958)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amitai Etzioni, Political Unification (New York, 1965).

    Google Scholar 

  25. See Kenneth Waltz, Man, the State and War (New York, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Inis L. Claude, Power and International Relations (New York, 1962).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 1995 Oxford University Press

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bull, H. (1995). The Theory of International Politics, 1919–1969 (1972). In: Der Derian, J. (eds) International Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23773-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics