Advertisement

International Institutions: Two Approaches (1988)

  • Robert Keohane

Abstract

Contemporary world politics is a matter of wealth and poverty, life and death. The members of this Association have chosen to study it because it is so important to our lives and those of other — not because it is either aesthetically attractive or amenable to successful theory-formulation and testing. Indeed, we would be foolish if we studied world politics in search of beauty or lasting truth. Beauty is absent because much that we observe is horrible, and many of the issues that we study involve dilemmas whose contemplation no sane person would find pleasing. Deterministic laws elude us, since we are studying the purposive behavior of relatively small numbers of actors engaged in strategic bargaining. In situations involving strategic bargaining, even formal theories, with highly restrictive assumptions, fail to specify which of many possible equilibrium outcomes will emerge.1 This suggests that no general theory of international politics may be feasible. It makes sense to seek to develop cumulative verifiable knowledge, but we must understand that we can aspire only to formulate conditional, context-specific generalizations rather than to discover universal laws, and that our understanding of world politics will always be incomplete.

Keywords

International Relation International Institution Rationalistic Theory World Politics International Politics 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. 1.
    Kreps, D. M. (1984) ‘Corporate Culture and Economic Theory’, Manuscript. Stanford, Calif.: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, p. 16.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University PressGoogle Scholar
  3. Haas, E. B. (1986) ‘Progress and International Relations’, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies, manuscript.Google Scholar
  4. 3.
    Holsti, K. J. (1986) ‘The Horsemen of the Apocalypse: At the Gate, Detoured or Retreating?’, International Studies Quarterly 30, 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 4.
    Keohane, R. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. 5.
    Bull, H. (1977) The Anarchical Society, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 6.
    Hoffmann, S. (1987) ‘Hans Morgenthau: The Limits and Influence of “Realism”’, in Janus and Minerva: Essays in the Theory and Practice of International Politics, edited by S. Hoffmann, pp. 70–81. Boulder: Westview, p. 74.Google Scholar
  8. 7.
    Simon, H. A. (1985) ‘Human Nature in Politics: The Dialogue of Psychology with Political Science’, American Political Science Review 79:293–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 8.
    Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation, New York: Basic Books. Keohane, R. O. (1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy, Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Oye, K. A. ed. (1986) Cooperation under Anarchy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  11. 9.
    Barry, B. (1970) Sociologists, Economists and Democracy, London: MacmillanGoogle Scholar
  12. Gilpin, R. (1981) War and Change in World Politics, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 10.
    Kratochwil, F. and J. G. Ruggie. (1986) ‘International Organization: A State of the Art on an Art of the State’, International Organization 40, 753–76, p. 765.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 11.
    Hughes, E. C. (1936) ‘The Ecological Aspect of Instiuttions’, American Sociological Review 1, 180–86, quoted in Zucker, L. G. (1977) ‘The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence’ American Sociological Review 42, p. 726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 13.
    Ruggie, J. G. (1986) ‘Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity: Toward a Neorealist Synthesis’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, pp. 131–57 (New York: Columbia University Press, p. 147.Google Scholar
  16. 14.
    Krasner, S. D. (1987) ‘Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective’. Manuscript. Stanford, Calif.: Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences, October.Google Scholar
  17. 15.
    Keohane, R. O. (1986) ‘Reciprocity in International Relations’, International Organization 40, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 16.
    North, D. C. (1987) ‘Institutions and Economic Growth: An Historical Introduction’. Paper prepared for the Conference on Knowledge and Institutional Change sponsored by the University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, November, p. 6.Google Scholar
  19. 17.
    March, J. and J. Olson (1984) ‘The New Institutionalism; Organizational Factors in Political Life’, American Political Science Review 79, p. 741.Google Scholar
  20. 19.
    Rawls, J. (1955) ‘Two Concepts of Rules’, Philosophical Review 64, p. 19 Rawls, J. (1971) A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Young, O. R. (1986) ‘International Regimes: Toward A New Theory of Institutions’, World Politics 39, p. 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    These practices have evolved over the course of decades or centuries and can therefore be considered in Young’s terminology to be spontaneous order: ‘the product of the action of many men but … not the result of human design’ (Young, O. R. (1983) ‘Regime Dynamics: The Rise and Fall of International Regimes’, in International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, pp. 93–114, Ithaca: Cornell University Press quoting Hayek, F. A. (1973) Rules and Order. Vol. 1 of Law, Legislation and Liberty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press), p. 98.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morgenthau, H. J. (1940) ‘Positivism, Functionalism and International Law’, American Journal of International Law 34, p. 279. Morgenthau’s language is remarkably close to the language of transaction costs employed by rationalistic theorists discussed in the next section.Google Scholar
  24. 25.
    McIlwain (Constitutionalism and the Changing World. New York: Macmillan; and Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1939)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    James (Sovereign Statehood. London: Allen and Unwin, 1986)Google Scholar
  26. 25.
    (Waltz, Theory of International Politics, Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley 1979, p. 96).Google Scholar
  27. 26.
    Wight, M. (1977) Systems of States, edited with an introduction by H. Bull. Leicester: Leicester University Press, p. 135.Google Scholar
  28. 27.
    North, D. C. (1984) ‘Government and the Cost of Exchange in History’, Journal of Economic History 44, p. 256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 28.
    North, D. C. (1981) Structure and Change in Economic History. New York: W. W. NortonGoogle Scholar
  30. Williamson, O. E. (1981) ‘The Modern Corporation: Origins, Evolution, Attributes’, Journal of Economic Literature 19, pp. 1537–68Google Scholar
  31. Williamson, O. E. (1985) The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free PressGoogle Scholar
  32. Keohane, After Hegemony Moe, T. M. (1987) ‘Interests, Institutions and Positive Theory: The Politics of the NLRB’, Studies in American Political Development 2, pp. 236–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 30.
    Finlayson, J. A. and M. W. Zacher (1983) ‘The Gatt and the Regulation of Trade Barriers: Regime Dynamics and Functions’, in International Regimes, edited by S. D. Krasner, pp. 273–315, Ithaca: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  34. Keohane, After Hegemony, Chapter 10; Aggarwal, V. K., Liberal Protectionism: The International Politics of Organized Textile Trade. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985Google Scholar
  35. Lipson, C. (1986) ‘Banker’s Dilemmas: Private Cooperation in Rescheduling Sovereign Debts’, in Cooperation under Anarchy, edited by K. Oye, pp. 200–25. Princeton: Princeton University PressGoogle Scholar
  36. Haggard, S. and B. A. Simmons. (1987) ‘Theories of International Regimes’, International Organization 41, pp. 491–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 31.
    Krasner, S. D. (1985) Structural Conflict: The Third World against Global Liberalism, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. 34.
    Kreps, D. and R. Wilson (1982) ‘Reputation and Imperfect Liformation’, Journal of Economic Theory 27, pp. 253–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 35.
    Eichengreen, B. (1987) ‘Till Debt Do Us Part: The U.S. Capital Market and Foreign Lending, 1920–1955’, Cambridge: NBER Working Paper no. 2394 (October)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindert, P. H. and P. J. Morton (1987) ‘How Sovereign Debt Has Worked’, University of California, Davis, Institute of Governmental Affairs, Research Program in Applied Macroeconomics and Macro Policy, Working Paper series no. 45, August.Google Scholar
  41. 37.
    Wendt, A. E. (1987) ‘The Agent-Structure Problem in International Relations Theory’, International Organization 41, p. 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 39.
    Shepsle, K. (1986) ‘Institutional Equilibrium and Equilibrium Institutions’, in Political Science: The Science of Politics, edited by H. F. Weisberg, pp. 51–81, New York: Agathon Press.Google Scholar
  43. 40.
    Moe, T. M. (1984) ‘The New Economics of Organization’, American Journal of Political Science 28:739–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Arrow, K. J. (1985) ‘The Economics of Agency’, in Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business, J. W. Pratt and R. J. Zeckhauser (eds.) pp. 37–51, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  45. 42.
    Axelrod, R. (1984) The Evolution of Cooperation Google Scholar
  46. Axelrod, R. (1986) ‘An Evolutionary Approach to Norms’, American Political Science Review 80, pp. 1095–1111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 43.
    Sutton, B. A. and M. W. Zacher (1987) ‘The Calculus and Conditions of International Collaboration: Evolution of the International Shipping Regime’, prepared for delivery at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago, September.Google Scholar
  48. 44.
    Some work by sociologists, although not applied to international relations, seems relevant here since it focuses on the role played by professional and personal networks in facilitating social cooperation. See Dore R. (1983) ‘Goodwill and the Spirit of Market Capitalism’, British Journal of Sociology 34, pp. 459–82, Granovetter, M. (1985) ‘Economic Action and Social Structure: The Problem of Embeddedness’, American Journal of Sociology 91, pp. 481–510, and Powell, W. W. (1987) ‘Hybrid Organizational Arrangements: New Form or Transitional Development?’ California Management Review 30, pp. 67–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 45.
    David, P. A. (1985) ‘Clio and the Economics of QWERTY’, American Economic Review Proceedings 75, pp. 332–37Google Scholar
  50. Arthur, W. B., Y. M. Ermoliev and Y. M. Kaniovski (1987) ‘Path-Dependent Processes and the Emergence of Macro-Structure’, European Journal of Operational Research, 30:294–303; March and Olson, ‘The New Constitutionalism,’ p. 745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 46.
    Stinchcombe, A. L. (1968) Constructing Social Theories, New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.Google Scholar
  52. 50.
    Field, A. J. (1981) ‘The Problem with Neoclassical Institutional Economics: A Critique with Special Reference to the North/Thomas model of pre-1500 Europe’, Explorations in Economic History 18:174–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Hirschman, A. D. (1970) ‘The Search for Paradigms as a Hindrance to Understanding’, World Politics 22(3), pp. 329–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Alker, H. R. Jr. (1986) ‘The Presumption of Anarchy in World Politics’, draft manuscript, Department of Political Science, MIT, August.Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Haas, E. B. (1987) ‘Adaptation and Learning in International Organizations’, Manuscript. Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.Google Scholar
  56. 57.
    Cox, R. W. (1986) ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Relations Theory’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, pp. 204–55, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 223.Google Scholar
  57. 58.
    Ashley, R. K. (1986) ‘The Poverty of Neorealism’, in Neorealism and Its Critics, edited by R. O. Keohane, New York: Columbia University Press, p. 290Google Scholar
  58. Alker, ‘The Presumption of Anarclry’ Kratochwil, F. (1986) ‘Of Systems, Boundaries and Territoriality: An Inquiry into the Formation of the State System’, World Politics 39, pp. 27–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Alker, H. R. Jr. (1985) ‘From Quantity to Quality: A New Research Program on Resolving Sequential Prisoner’s Dilemmas’, paper delivered at the August meeting of the American Political Science Association.Google Scholar
  60. 63.
    Putnam, R. D. (1988) ‘Diplomacy and Domestic Politics; The Logic of Two-Level Games’, International Organization 42, pp. 427–60Google Scholar
  61. 64.
    Recently major work has been done on links between domestic and international politics, by scholars trained in comparative politics. Unlike the critics of rationalistic theory discussed above, however, these writers emphasize international structure, material interests, and state organization as well as the role of ideas and social patterns of learning. Also unlike the critics of rationalist international relations theory, these writers have engaged in extensive and detailed empirical research. See Zysman, J. Governments, Markets and Growth (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1983), Katzenstein, P. J. Small States in World Markets (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1985), Gourevitch, P. A. ‘The Second Image Reversed: International Sources of Domestic Politics’ International Organization 32, pp. 881–912, (1978); Politics in Hard Times (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1986), and Alt, J. A. ‘Crude Politics: Oil and the Political Economy of Unemployment in Britain and Norway, 1970–85,’ British Journal of Political Science 17, pp. 149–99Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Studies Quarterly 1995

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert Keohane

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations