Abstract
The Left is characterized by its lack of humor. This has set it apart from other forms of opposition to capitalism, e.g., avant-garde art. The latter’s irony, self-mockery, and playfulness was a lèse-majesté to the Left as much as it was to the priests of the establishment. Épater-le-bourgeois has never been a Left strategy, because the Left has treated le bourgeois seriously as the author of a project the Left thought worth fulfilling and as the hindrance to its fulfilment at the same time.
At the end of this development the intellectuals of the opposition asked themselves in all seriousness: is there still a proletariat? Is there still a ruling class? Whereas they would have been more justified in asking: is there still an intellectual opposition?
Short-term hopes are futile. Long-term resignation is suicidal.
Hans Magnus Enzenberger
Reprinted from Telos, no. 70 (Winter, 1986–7), pp. 81–93.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 1995 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bauman, Z. (1995). The Left as the Counterculture of Modernity. In: Lyman, S.M. (eds) Social Movements. Main Trends of the Modern World. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23747-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23747-0_15
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-0-333-62019-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23747-0
eBook Packages: Palgrave Social & Cultural Studies CollectionSocial Sciences (R0)