Explanation and Theological Method

  • Donald Wiebe
Part of the Library of Philosophy and Religion book series (LPR)


Religion, Hans Reichenbach has claimed, ‘is abundant in pictures that stimulate our imagination but devoid of the power of clarification that issues from scientific explanation’.1 Philosophers of science have in general found themselves in agreement with this evaluation of religious discourse. Science, they have almost unanimously claimed, has achieved a generalized theoretical knowledge of the fundamental conditions determining the events and processes of the world whereas religion has simply spotted superficial analogies which it has confused with proper generalizations and consequently erroneously regarded as explanations. It would appear, therefore, that the long and often acrimonious debate as to the cognitive status of religious belief must, upon analysis of the concept of explanation alone, be concluded. Thus it appears also that the philosophers of religion who have argued that religion’s concern lies exclusively in providing humanity with a ‘way of life’, rather than a speculative ‘scheme of things’, must carry the day.


Religious Belief Scientific Explanation Religious Experience Empirical World Religious Discourse 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Donald Wiebe 1994

Authors and Affiliations

  • Donald Wiebe
    • 1
  1. 1.Trinity CollegeTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations