Skip to main content

Introduction: The Pertinence of the ‘International’

  • Chapter
Book cover Rethinking International Relations

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is two-fold: to examine what is meant by the term ‘international’ and the confusion it occasions, and secondly to provide a brief account of the growth in the discipline, and the factors underlying this development. International Relations (IR) has occupied an uneasy, often marginal, place in the study and teaching of the social sciences. Yet its subject matter is, in the simplest terms, clear enough, comprising three forms of interaction — relations between states, non-state or ‘transnational’ relations across frontiers, and the operations of the system as a whole, within which states and societies are the main components. While they may vary in the stress they lay on each of these, all theories of the ‘international’ propose some explanation of each: indeed the major debates within IR revolve, to a greater or lesser extent, around these three dimensions and the primacy of one or the other.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. Robin Blackburn, The Overthrow of Colonial Slavery, 1776–1848 (London: Verso, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ulrich Albrecht, Internationale Politik (Munich: Oldenbourg, 1986) ch. 9, ‘Das Demokratieproblem in der internationalen Politik’.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1977); Fred Northedge, The International Political System (London: Faber & Faber, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Carl Schmitt, The Concept of The Political (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Robert Keohane and Joseph Nye (eds) Transnational Relations and World Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kenneth Waltz, ‘The myth of national interdependence’ in Charles Kindelberger (ed.) The International Corporation (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Stephen Krasner, Structural Conflict: The Third World Against Global Liberalism (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robert Tucker, The Inequality of Nations (London: Martin Robertson, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Relations (New York: Random House, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Fred Halliday

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halliday, F. (1994). Introduction: The Pertinence of the ‘International’. In: Rethinking International Relations. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23658-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics