Skip to main content

Military Organisation

  • Chapter
  • 33 Accesses

Part of the book series: British History in Perspective ((BHP))

Abstract

Post-Conquest Anglo-Norman society was a society organised for war. In this it was, of course, typical of its age. Though we cannot talk of a ‘war economy’ in the eleventh century, the Anglo-Norman kings spent at least as much of the country’s resources on war and preparation for war as any modern totalitarian regime.1 The bulk of royal taxation was employed for military purposes; the agents of royal government were first and foremost military men; land tenure was determined by royal and aristocratic need for armed forces. Yet how this society was organised remains the most vexed matter of all. How far did the Norman colonists depend on Anglo-Saxon practice? How far were they innovatory? How much did the mounted knights contribute to the armed strength of Anglo-Norman England, and when and how was knight service introduced? These are weighty questions. Their hypothetical solutions owe much to the prejudices—including those of race and politics—of contemporary historians; just as they have since the seventeenth century.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

  1. The classic account is J. Prestwich, ‘War and Finance in the Anglo-Norman State’, TRHS, 5th series, 4 (1954), pp. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  2. See especially M. Chibnall, ‘Military Service in Normandy before 1066’, ANS, 5 (1982), pp. 65–77; D. C. Bates, Normandy before 1066, pp. 122–8; and E. Z. Tabuteau, ‘Definitions of Feudal Military Obligations in Eleventh-Century Normandy’, in M. S. Arnold et al. (eds), On the Laws and Customs of England: Essays in Honor of S. E. Thorne (Chapel Hill, NC, 1981), pp. 18–59.

    Google Scholar 

  3. As hinted by E. van Houts, ‘The Ship-List of William the Conqueror’, ANS, 10 (1987), pp. 170–2.

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. P. Brooks, ‘Arms, Status and Warfare in Late-Saxon England’, in D. Hill (ed.), Ethelred the Unready (BAR, British Series, 59, 1978), p. 87.

    Google Scholar 

  5. See J. Kiff, ‘Images of War: Dlustrations of Warfare in Early Eleventh-Century England’, ANS, 7 (1984), pp. 177–94.

    Google Scholar 

  6. See N. Hooper, ‘The Housecarls in England in the Eleventh Century’, ANS, 7 (1984), pp. 161–76. For a rather different interpretation, see J. Campbell, ‘Some Agents and Agencies of the Late Anglo-Saxon State’, in J. C. Holt (ed.), Domesday Studies (Woodbridge, 1987), pp. 201–4.

    Google Scholar 

  7. The fullest treatment is N. Hooper, ‘Some Observations on the Navy in Late Anglo-Saxon England’, in C. Harper-Bill et al. (eds), Studies in Medieval History presented to R. Allen Brown (Woodbridge, 1989), pp. 203–13. See also C. W. Hollister, Anglo-Saxon Military Institutions on the Eve of the Norman Conquest (Oxford, 1962), ch. VI, and The Military Organisation of Norman England, pp. 248–9.

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. G. Harfield, ‘A Handlist of Castles recorded in the Domesday Book’, EHR, 106 (1991), pp. 371–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Williams, ‘A Bell-house and a Burh-geat: Lordly Residences in England before the Norman Conquest’, in C. Harper-Bill and R. Harvey (eds), Medieval Knighthood, IV (Woodbridge, 1992), pp. 221–40.

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Golding, ‘Robert of Mortain’, ANS, 13 (1990), pp. 134–5.

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. F. A. Mason, ‘Barons and their Officials in the Later Eleventh Century’, ANS, 13 (1990), pp. 243–62.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Bradbury, ‘Battles in England and Normandy, 1066–1154’, ANS, 6 (1983), pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  13. The fullest account is J. O. Prestwich, ‘The Military Household of the Norman Kings’, EHR, 96 (1981), pp. 1–37. Also see above, pp. 95–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. C. Holt, ‘The Introduction of Knight Service in England’, ANS, 6 (1983), pp. 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  15. By M. Hollings, ‘The Survival of the Five-Hide Unit in the West Midlands’, EHR, 63 (1948), pp. 453–87, and E. John, Land Tenure in Early England, (Leicester, 1960), pp. 80–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. J. Gillingham, ‘The Introduction of Knight Service into England’, ANS 4 (1981), pp. 53–64.

    Google Scholar 

  17. The most sensitive recent discussion is D. Fleming, ‘Landholding by Milites in Domesday Book: a Revision’, ANS, 13 (1990), pp. 83–98.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Harvey, ‘The Knight and the Knight’s Fee in England’, Past and Present, 49 (1970), pp. 3–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Coss, ‘Literary and Social Terminology: the Vavasour in England’, in T. H. Aston et al. (eds), Social Relations and Ideas (Cambridge, 1983), pp. 109–50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 1994 Brian Golding

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Golding, B. (1994). Military Organisation. In: Conquest and Colonisation. British History in Perspective. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23648-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-23648-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-333-42918-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-23648-0

  • eBook Packages: Palgrave History CollectionHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics