This paper is based on interviews with convicted commercial burglars who were on probation or in prison. It aims to establish why people commit this type of offence, and to identify the sorts of decisions involved in deciding how to carry it out, with particular reference to security systems. In short, this paper sets out to provide an insight into the commercial burglar’s perspective on crime.
KeywordsFoam Cage Income Assure Posit
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Bennett, T. and Wright, R. (1984) Burglars on burglary: prevention and the offender. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
- Cornish, D. and Clarke, R. (eds) (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
- Cromwell, P.F., Olson, J.N. and Avary, D.W. (1991) Breaking and entering an ethnographic analysis of burglary, London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Maguire, M. (1982) Burglary in a dwelling: the offence, the offender and the victim. Cambridge Studies in Criminology. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Matthews, R. and Young, J. (1992) Issues in realist criminology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Reppetto, T. (1974) Residential crime. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
- Scarr, H.A. (1973) Patterns of burglary. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
- Walsh, D. (1980) Break-ins; burglary from private houses. London: Constable.Google Scholar
- Walsh, D. (1986) Heavy business: commercial burglary and robbery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Young, J. and Matthews, R. (1992) Rethinking criminology: the realist debate. London: Sage.Google Scholar