Advertisement

Robbers on robbery: offenders’ perspectives

  • Martin Gill
  • Roger Matthews

Abstract

There are very few studies of commercial robbery 1so this paper will attempt to redress the imbalance. It is based on findings from 341 interviews with convicted robbers in British prisons and the main aim is to identify areas where preventative policies may be deemed to be effective. Essentially, crime prevention strategies afford the opportunity to intervene at various stages in the development of a crime and as a consequence deflect or dissuade potential offenders. Initially, they may influence an individual’s decision whether to commit an offence. Second, crime prevention strategies may be used at the point where the individual plans the offence and selects the target. An understanding of attitudes towards security measures will help to identify effective preventative strategies. Third, crime prevention strategies may influence how the robbery is carried out by reducing the vulnerability of potential targets.

Keywords

Crime Prevention Security Measure Post Office Previous Conviction Building Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. Austin, C. (1988) The prevention of robbery at building society branches. Crime Prevention Unit paper 14 . London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  2. Ballard, M. (1991) On the safe side. Canadian Banker. 98, 3, May–June, pp 30–31.Google Scholar
  3. Banton, M. (1985) Investigating robbery. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  4. Canadian Banking Association/Montreal Urban Community (1987) Bank robbers in the Montreal urban community. Unpublished report.Google Scholar
  5. Challinger, D. (1988) Armed robbery. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  6. Conklin, J. (1972) Robbery and the criminal justice system. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  7. Cornish, D. and Clarke, R. (1986) The reasoning criminal: rational choice perspectives on offending. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ekblom, P. (1987) Preventing robberies at sub-post offices; an evaluation of a security initiative. Crime Prevention Unit paper 9. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  9. Gabor, T., Baril, ML, Cusson, M., Elie, D., Lebanc, M. and Normandeau, A. (1987) Armed robbery, cops, robbers, and victims. Illinois: Charles C. Thomas.Google Scholar
  10. Harding, R.W. and Blake, A. (1989) Weapon choice by violent offenders in Western Australia: a pilot study. Crime Research Centre: University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
  11. Hoare, M. (1980) The pattern of experience in the use of firearms by criminals and the police response. Unpublished MSc thesis: Cranfield University.Google Scholar
  12. Home Office (1986) Standing conference on crime prevention, report of the working party on commercial robbery. London: Home Office.Google Scholar
  13. MacDonald, J. (1975) Armed robbery: offenders and their victims. Illinois: CC Thomas Springfield.Google Scholar
  14. Marsden, J.S. (1990) Bank robbery: strategies for reduction. Australian Banking Association.Google Scholar
  15. McClintock, F.H. and Gibson, E. (1961) Robbery in London. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  16. Skogan, W. (1978) Weapon use in robbery: patterns and policy implications. North-western University Center for Urban Affairs. Illinois: Evaston.Google Scholar
  17. Walsh, D. (1986) Heavy business: commercial burglary and robbery. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Gill
  • Roger Matthews

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations